Does Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) Affect Women’s Sexual Functioning? A Systematic Review of the Sexual Consequences of FGM/C
- 2k Downloads
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) refers to a cultural practice which involves partial removal of or injury to the female external genitalia for cultural or other non-therapeutic reasons. Estimates suggest that there are 100–130 million girls and women currently living with various health consequences from FGM/C. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. A total of 15 studies, of variable methodological quality, with 12,671 participants from seven different countries were included. The majority of the 65 outcomes were statistically associated with FGM/C status at study level. Meta-analysis results showed that compared to women without FGM/C, women who had been subjected to FGM/C were more likely to report dyspareunia (relative risk (RR) = 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15, 2.0), no sexual desire (RR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.37, 3.36) and less sexual satisfaction (standardized mean difference = −0.34, 95% CI = −0.56, −0.13). Heterogeneity precluded additional consideration of other outcomes. The systematic review substantiates the proposition that a woman whose genital tissues have been partly removed is more likely to experience increased pain and reduction in sexual satisfaction and desire. Increased research efforts to investigate the sexual harms from FGM/C are indicated. Sexual education and therapy could be offered to women with FGM/C who want that.
KeywordsFemale genital mutilation/cutting Consequences Sexual functioning Systematic review
We are grateful to the Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies for providing financial support for the systematic review. Thank you to R. Elise Johansen, Susan Munabi-Babigumira and Tove Ringerike for valuable comments to earlier drafts of the systematic review.
References of the 15 studies included in the systematic review are identified in bold.
- Abd El-Hady, R. M., & El-Nashar, A. B. (1998). Long term impact of circumcision on health of newly married females in Benha City. Zagazig University Medical Journal, 6, 839–851.Google Scholar
- Abdal Magied, A., & Musa, S. (2004). Psycho-sexual effect of female genital mutilation on Sudanese men. Ahfad Journal: Women and Change, 21(1), 18–28.Google Scholar
- Abdulcadir, J., Margairaz, C., Boulvain, M., & Irion, O. (2011). Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Medical Weekly, 140, E1–E9.Google Scholar
- Badawi, M. (1989). Epidemiology of female sexual castration in Cairo, Egypt. Truth Seeker, 1(3), 31–34. Available online http://www.nocirc.org/symposia/first/badawi.html.
- Berg, R. C., Denison, E., & Fretheim, A. (2010). Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): A systematic review of quantitative studies. Report from Kunnskapssenteret nr 13–2010. Oslo: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten.Google Scholar
- Denison, E., Berg, R., & Fretheim, A. (2009). Effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting. Report from Kunnskapssenteret nr 25–2009. Oslo: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten.Google Scholar
- Dopico, M. (2007). Infibulation and the orgasm puzzle: Sexual experiences of infibulated Eritrean women in rural Eritrea and Melbourne, Australia. In Y. Hernlund & B. Shell-Duncan (Eds.), Transcultural bodies: Female genital cutting in global context (pp. 224–247). London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- European Parliament (2004). Combating violence against women. European Parliament resolution on the current situation in combating violence against women and any future action (2004/2220(INI)). Available online http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2006-0038+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
- Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (eds.) (2008). In Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.0.1 ed. The Cochrane Collaboration.Google Scholar
- Hilber, A. M., Hull, T. H., Preston-Whyte, E., Bagnol, B., Smit, J., Wacharasin, C., et al. (2010). A cross cultural study of vaginal practices and sexuality: Implications for sexual health. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 369–400.Google Scholar
- Hyde, J. S., & Delamater, J. D. (Eds.). (2006). Understanding human sexuality (9th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- IRIN (2005). Razors edge. The controversy over female genital mutilation. Available online http://www.irinnews.org/IndepthMain.aspx?IndepthId=15&ReportId=62462
- Johansen, R. E. B. (2007). Experiencing sex in exile: Can genitals change their gender? On conception and experiences related to female genital cutting (FGC) among Somalis in Norway. In Y. Hernlund & B. Shell-Duncan (Eds.), Transcultural bodies: Female genital cutting in global context (pp. 248–277). London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, H. S. (1974). The new sex therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
- Leiblum, S. R. (2000). Redefining female sexual response. Contemporary Ob/Gyn, 45(11), 120–126.Google Scholar
- Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
- Muteshi, J., & Sass, J. (2005). Female genital mutilation in Africa: An analysis of current abandonment approaches. Nairobi, PATH. Available online http://www.path.org/files/CP_fgm_combnd_rpt.pdf
- Omara, B. H. (1994). Bad psychological effects of the procedure of girls’ circumcision. In Paper presented to the meeting of NGO in preparation for the International Conference for Population and Development, Cairo.Google Scholar
- UNICEF (2005). Female genital mutilation/female genital cutting: A statistical exploration. New York: United Nations Children's Fund. Available online http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/FGM-C_final_10_October.pdf
- Vloeberghs, E., Knipscheer, J., van der Kwaak, A., Naleie, Z., & van den Muijsenbergh, M. (2010). Veiled pain. A research in The Netherlands into the psychological, social and relational effects of female genital mutilation. Available online http://www.kit.nl/net/KIT_Publications_output/Showfile2.aspx?e=1633
- WHO (2010). Global strategy to stop health-care providers from performing female genital mutilation. Available online http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_RHR_10.9_eng.pdf
- WHO (2008). Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available online http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/publications/2008/eliminating_fgm.pdf
- WHO. (2006). Female genital mutilation—knew knowledge spurs optimism. Progress in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, 72, 1–8.Google Scholar
- WHO. (1997). Female genital mutilation. A joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA statement. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- Yoder, S., & Kahn, S. (2008). Numbers of women circumcised in Africa: the production of a total. United States Agency for International Development. DHS working papers, 39. Available online http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/WP39/WP39.pdf