Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 41–56 | Cite as

Does Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) Affect Women’s Sexual Functioning? A Systematic Review of the Sexual Consequences of FGM/C

Article

Abstract

Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) refers to a cultural practice which involves partial removal of or injury to the female external genitalia for cultural or other non-therapeutic reasons. Estimates suggest that there are 100–130 million girls and women currently living with various health consequences from FGM/C. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. A total of 15 studies, of variable methodological quality, with 12,671 participants from seven different countries were included. The majority of the 65 outcomes were statistically associated with FGM/C status at study level. Meta-analysis results showed that compared to women without FGM/C, women who had been subjected to FGM/C were more likely to report dyspareunia (relative risk (RR) = 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15, 2.0), no sexual desire (RR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.37, 3.36) and less sexual satisfaction (standardized mean difference = −0.34, 95% CI = −0.56, −0.13). Heterogeneity precluded additional consideration of other outcomes. The systematic review substantiates the proposition that a woman whose genital tissues have been partly removed is more likely to experience increased pain and reduction in sexual satisfaction and desire. Increased research efforts to investigate the sexual harms from FGM/C are indicated. Sexual education and therapy could be offered to women with FGM/C who want that.

Keywords

Female genital mutilation/cutting Consequences Sexual functioning Systematic review 

References

References of the 15 studies included in the systematic review are identified in bold.

  1. Abd El-Hady, R. M., & El-Nashar, A. B. (1998). Long term impact of circumcision on health of newly married females in Benha City. Zagazig University Medical Journal, 6, 839–851.Google Scholar
  2. Abdal Magied, A., & Musa, S. (2004). Psycho-sexual effect of female genital mutilation on Sudanese men. Ahfad Journal: Women and Change, 21(1), 18–28.Google Scholar
  3. Abdulcadir, J., Margairaz, C., Boulvain, M., & Irion, O. (2011). Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Medical Weekly, 140, E1–E9.Google Scholar
  4. Adam, T., Bathija, H., Bishai, D., Bonnenfant, Y., Darwish, M., Huntington, D., et al. (2010). Estimating the obstetric costs of female genital mutilation in six African countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 281–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adinma, J. I. B. (1997). Current status of female circumcision among Nigerian Igbos. West African Journal of Medicine, 16(4), 227–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Krenawi, A., & Wiesel-Lev, R. (1999). Attitudes toward and perceived psychosocial impact of female circumcision as practiced among the Bedouin-Arabs of the Negrev. Family Process, 38(4), 431–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Almroth, L., Almroth-Berggren, V., Hassanein, O. M., Al-Said, S. S. E., Hasan, S. S. A., Lithell, U., et al. (2001). Male complications of female genital mutilation. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1455–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Almroth, L., Elmusharaf, S., El Hadi, N., Obeid, A., El Sheik, M. A. A., Elfadil, S. M., et al. (2005). Primary infertility after genital mutilation in girlhood in Sudan: a case-control study. Lancet, 366, 385–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Alsibiani, S., & Rouzi, A. A. (2010). Sexual functioning in women with female genital mutilation. Fertility and Sterility, 93(3), 722–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Asali, A., Khamaysi, N., Aburabia, Y., Letzer, S., Halilal, B., Sadovsky, M., et al. (1995). Ritual female genital surgery among Bedouin in Israel. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 24, 571–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Askew, I. (2005). Methodological issues in measuring the impact of interventions against female genital cutting. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 7(5), 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Badawi, M. (1989). Epidemiology of female sexual castration in Cairo, Egypt. Truth Seeker, 1(3), 31–34. Available online http://www.nocirc.org/symposia/first/badawi.html.
  13. Bancroft, J. (2002). Biological factors in human sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 39(1), 15–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baskin, L. S., Erol, A., Li, Y. W., Liu, W. H., Kurzrock, E., & Cunha, G. R. (1999). Anatomical studies of the human clitoris. The Journal of Urology, 162, 1015–1020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Basson, R. (2001). Human sex-response cycles. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 27, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Behrendt, A., & Moritz, S. (2005). Posttraumatic stress disorder and memory problems after female genital mutilation. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(2), 1000–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berg, R. C., Denison, E., & Fretheim, A. (2010). Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): A systematic review of quantitative studies. Report from Kunnskapssenteret nr 13–2010. Oslo: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten.Google Scholar
  18. Catania, L., Abdulcadir, O., Puppo, V., Verde, J. D., Abdulcadir, J., & Abdulcadir, D. (2007). Pleasure and orgasm in women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 1666–1678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cutner, I. P. (1985). Female genital mutilation. Obstetrics and Gynecology Survey, 40, 734–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Denison, E., Berg, R., & Fretheim, A. (2009). Effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting. Report from Kunnskapssenteret nr 25–2009. Oslo: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten.Google Scholar
  21. Dopico, M. (2007). Infibulation and the orgasm puzzle: Sexual experiences of infibulated Eritrean women in rural Eritrea and Melbourne, Australia. In Y. Hernlund & B. Shell-Duncan (Eds.), Transcultural bodies: Female genital cutting in global context (pp. 224–247). London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Einstein, G. (2008). From body to brain: Considering the neurobiological effects of female genital cutting. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 51(1), 84–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. El-Defrawi, M. H., Lotfy, G., Dandash, K. H., Refaat, A. H., & Eyada, M. (2001). Female genital mutilation and its psychosexual impact. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 27, 465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elmusharaf, S., Elhadi, N., & Almroth, L. (2006). Reliability of self-reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: Cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal, 333, 124–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elnashar, A., & Abdelhady, R. (2007a). The impact of female genital cutting on health of newly married women. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 97, 238–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elnashar, A. M., Ibrahim, M. E., El-Desoky, M. M., Ali, O. M., & Hassan, M. E. M. (2007b). Female sexual dysfunction in Lower Egypt. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(2), 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. European Parliament (2004). Combating violence against women. European Parliament resolution on the current situation in combating violence against women and any future action (2004/2220(INI)). Available online http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2006-0038+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
  28. Foldes, P., & Louis-Sylvestre, C. (2006). Results of surgical clitoral repair after ritual excision: 453 cases. Gynècologie, Obstètric & Fertilitè, 34(12), 1137–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Vist, G. E., Falck-Ytter, Y., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? British Medical Journal, 336(7651), 995–998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (eds.) (2008). In Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.0.1 ed. The Cochrane Collaboration.Google Scholar
  31. Hilber, A. M., Hull, T. H., Preston-Whyte, E., Bagnol, B., Smit, J., Wacharasin, C., et al. (2010). A cross cultural study of vaginal practices and sexuality: Implications for sexual health. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 369–400.Google Scholar
  32. Hyde, J. S., & Delamater, J. D. (Eds.). (2006). Understanding human sexuality (9th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  33. IRIN (2005). Razors edge. The controversy over female genital mutilation. Available online http://www.irinnews.org/IndepthMain.aspx?IndepthId=15&ReportId=62462
  34. Johansen, R. E. B. (2007). Experiencing sex in exile: Can genitals change their gender? On conception and experiences related to female genital cutting (FGC) among Somalis in Norway. In Y. Hernlund & B. Shell-Duncan (Eds.), Transcultural bodies: Female genital cutting in global context (pp. 248–277). London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, H., Diop, N., Askew, I., & Kaboré, I. (1999). Female genital cutting practices in Burkina Faso and Mali and their negative health consequences. Studies in Family Planning, 30(3), 219–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaplan, H. S. (1974). The new sex therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  37. Krása, K. (2010). Human rights for women: The ethical and legal discussion about female genital mutilation in Germany in comparison with other Western European countries. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 13, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leiblum, S. R. (2000). Redefining female sexual response. Contemporary Ob/Gyn, 45(11), 120–126.Google Scholar
  39. Levin, R. J. (2002). The physiology of sexual arousal in the human female: A recreational and procreational synthesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 405–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levine, S. B. (2003). The nature of sexual desire: A clinician’s perspective. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 32(3), 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leye, E., DeBlonde, J., Garcia-Añon, J., Johnsdotter, S., Kwateng-Kluvitse, A., Weil-Curiel, L., et al. (2007). An analysis of the implementation of laws with regard to female genital mutilation in Europe. Crime, Law and Social Change, 47, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lightfoot-Klein, H. (1989). The sexual experience and marital adjustment of genitally circumcised and infibulated females in the Sudan. Journal of Sex Research, 26(3), 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  44. Megafu, U. (1983). Female ritual circumcision in Africa: An investigation of the presumed benefits among Ibos of Nigeria. East African Medical Journal, 60(11), 793–800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Morison, L., Scherf, C., Ekpo, G., Paine, K., West, B., Coleman, R., Walraven, G. (2001). The long-term reproductive health consequences of female genital cutting in rural Gambia: A community-based survey. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 6(8), 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morison, L. A., Dirir, A., Elmi, S., Warsame, J., & Dirir, S. (2004). How experiences and attitudes relating to female circumcision vary according to age of arrival in Britain: A study among young Somalis in London. Ethnicity & Health, 9(1), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Muteshi, J., & Sass, J. (2005). Female genital mutilation in Africa: An analysis of current abandonment approaches. Nairobi, PATH. Available online http://www.path.org/files/CP_fgm_combnd_rpt.pdf
  48. Nour, N. M., Michels, K. B., & Bryant, A. E. (2006). Defibulation to treat female genital cutting. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108(1), 55–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nwajei, S. D., & Otino, A. I. (2003). Female genital mutilation: Implications for female sexuality. Women's Studies International Forum 26(6), 575–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Obermeyer, C. M. (2005). The consequences of female circumcision for health and sexuality: An update in the evidence. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 7(5), 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Obermeyer, C. M. (1999). Female genital surgeries: The known, the unknown, and the unknowable. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, 13(1), 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Odoi, A., Brody, S. P., & Elkins, T. E. (1997). Female genital mutilation in rural Ghana, West Africa. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 56(2), 179–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Okonofua, F. E., Larsen, U., Oronsaye, F., Snow, R. C., & Slanger, T. E. (2002). The association between female genital cutting and correlates of sexual and gynaecological morbidity in Edo State, Nigeria. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Omara, B. H. (1994). Bad psychological effects of the procedure of girls’ circumcision. In Paper presented to the meeting of NGO in preparation for the International Conference for Population and Development, Cairo.Google Scholar
  55. Osinowo, H. O., & Taiwo, A. O. (2003). Impact of female genital mutilation on sexual functioning, self-esteem and marital instability of women in Ajegunle. Ife Psychologia, 11(1), 123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Raina, R., Pahlajani, G., Khan, S., Gupta, S., Agarwal, A., & Zippe, C. D. (2007). Female sexual dysfunction: Classification, pathophysiology and management. Fertility and Sterility, 88, 1273–1284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roald, A. S. (2001). Women in Islam: The Western experience. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shandall, A. A. (1967). Circumcision and infibulations of females. A general consideration of the problem and a clinical study of the complications in Sudanese women. Sudan Medical Journal, 5(4), 178–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Snow, R. C., Slanger, T. E., Okonofua, F. E., Oronsaye, F., & Wacker, J. (2002). Female genital cutting in urban and peri-urban Nigeria: Self-reported validity, social determinants and secular decline. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 7, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steege, J., & Zolnoun, D. A. (2009). Evaluation and treatment of dyspareunia. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 113(5), 1124–1136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Stewart, H., Morison, L., & White, R. (2002). Determinants of coital frequency among married women in Central African Republic: The role of female genital cutting. Journal of Biosocial Science, 34(4), 525–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thabet, S. M. A., & Thabet, A. S. (2003). Defective sexuality and female circumcision: The cause and the possible management. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 29(1), 12–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Toubia, N. (1994). Female circumcision as a public health issue. The New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 712–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Traish, A. M., Kim, N. N., Munarriz, R., Moreland, R., & Goldstein, I. (2002). Biochemical and physiological mechanisms of female genital sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13(5), 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. UNICEF (2005). Female genital mutilation/female genital cutting: A statistical exploration. New York: United Nations Children's Fund. Available online http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/FGM-C_final_10_October.pdf
  66. Villani, M. (2009). From the ‘maturity’ of a woman to surgery: Conditions for clitoris repair. Sexologies, 18, 259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vloeberghs, E., Knipscheer, J., van der Kwaak, A., Naleie, Z., & van den Muijsenbergh, M. (2010). Veiled pain. A research in The Netherlands into the psychological, social and relational effects of female genital mutilation. Available online http://www.kit.nl/net/KIT_Publications_output/Showfile2.aspx?e=1633
  68. WHO (2010). Global strategy to stop health-care providers from performing female genital mutilation. Available online http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_RHR_10.9_eng.pdf
  69. WHO (2008). Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available online http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/publications/2008/eliminating_fgm.pdf
  70. WHO. (2006). Female genital mutilation—knew knowledge spurs optimism. Progress in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, 72, 1–8.Google Scholar
  71. WHO. (1997). Female genital mutilation. A joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA statement. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  72. WHO Study Group. (2006). Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet, 367(9525), 1835–1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yang, C. C., Cold, C. J., Yilmaz, U., & Maravilla, K. R. (2005). Sexually responsive vascular tissue of the vulva. British Journal of Urology International, 97(4), 766–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yang, C. C., Bowen, J. R., Kraft, G. H., Uchio, E. M., & Kromm, B. G. (2000). Cortical evoked potentials of the dorsal nerve of the clitoris and female sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. The Journal of Urology, 164, 2010–2013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yoder, S., & Kahn, S. (2008). Numbers of women circumcised in Africa: the production of a total. United States Agency for International Development. DHS working papers, 39. Available online http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/WP39/WP39.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Evidence-Based Health ServicesNorwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health ServicesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations