Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 58–66 | Cite as

Reinventing Sexual Scripts: Sexuality and Social Change in the Twenty-First Century (The 2008 John H. Gagnon Distinguished Lecture on Sexuality, Modernity and Change)

The John H. Gagnon Distinguished Lecture

Abstract

This article focuses on the politics and practice of sexuality in the early twenty-first century. Drawing on a set of case studies from diverse societies in different regions of the world, the author examines both the intersection of and the tension between grassroots struggles for sexual freedom and transnational movements for sexual rights within the broader context of ongoing global transformations. Building on John Gagnon and William Simon's pioneering work on sexual scripts, the author explores the ways in which the rapidly changing politics of sexuality contribute to the reinvention of sexual meanings and intimate relations across a wide range of diverse social settings and contexts. This article is based on the author's presentation for the 2008 John H. Gagnon Distinguished Lecture on Sexuality, Modernity and Change.

Keywords

Politics Social movements Sexual rights Transnational Sexual diversity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article was originally prepared for presentation as the second annual John H. Gagnon Distinguished Lecture on Sexuality, Modernity and Social Change, at the invitation of the Department of Human Sexuality Studies and the Institute for Sexuality, Inequality, and Health at San Francisco State University. Special thanks to Professor Gilbert Herdt and his colleagues at San Francisco State University for the invitation, and for their wonderful hospitality. Thanks also to Nancy Worthington from the Department of Sociomedical Sciences at Columbia University for her extremely helpful editorial assistance.

References

  1. Alvarez, S. (2000). Translating the global: effects of transnational organizing on local feminist discourses and practice in Latin America. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 22, 1–27.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baden, S., & Goetz, A. M. (1997). Debating discourses, practicing feminisms. Feminist Review, 56, 3–25.Google Scholar
  4. Berkman, A., Garcia, J., Muñoz-Laboy, M., Paiva, V., & Parker, R. (2005). A critical analysis of the Brazilian response to HIV/AIDS: Lessons learned for controlling and mitigating the epidemic in developing countries. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1162–1172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cash, K., Khan, S. I., Nasreen, H., Bhuiya, A., Chowdhury, S., & Chowdhury, A. M. (2001). Telling them their own stories; legitimizing sexual and reproductive health education in rural Bangladesh. Sex Education, 1, 43–57.Google Scholar
  8. Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Chabot, S., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2002). Globalization and transnational diffusion between social movements: Reconceptualizing the dissemination of the Gandhian repertoire and the “coming out” routine. Theory and Society, 31, 697–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandiramani, R. (1998). Talking about sex. Reproductive Health Matters, 6(12), 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corrêa, S., & Petchesky, R. (1994). Reproductive and sexual rights: A feminist perspective. In G. Sen, A. Germaine, & L. Chen (Eds.), Population policies reconsidered: Health, empowerment, and rights (pp. 107–123). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Corrêa, S., Petchesky, R., & Parker, R. (2008). Sexuality, health and human rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction—Volume 1. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  14. Gagnon, J. H. (2004). An interpretation of desire: Essays in the study of sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. S. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  16. Garcia, J., & Parker, R. (2006). From global discourse to local actions: the makings of a sexual rights movement. Horizontes Antropológicos, 12(26), 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar
  18. Hardee, K., Agarwal, K., Luke, N., Wilson, E., Pendzich, M., Farrell, M., et al. (1999). Reproductive health policies and programs in eight countries: Progress since Cairo. International Family Planning Perspectives, 25, S2–S9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. International Council on Human Rights Policy. (2009). Sexuality and human rights: Discussion paper. Geneva, Switzerland: ICHRP.Google Scholar
  20. Kraak, G. (1998). Class, race, nationalism and the politics of identity: A perspective from the South. Development Update, 2(2). Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.interfund.org.za/vol2no21998.html [no longer available].
  21. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Parker, R. (1997). Sexual rights: Concepts and actions. Health and Human Rights, 2(3), 31–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Parker, R. (2007). Sexuality, health, and human rights. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 972–973.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Parker, R. (2008). AIDS solidarity as policy: constructing the Brazilian model. NACLA Report on the Americas, 41(4), 20–24.Google Scholar
  25. Parker, R., di Mauro, D., Filiano, B., Garcia, J., Munoz-Laboy, M., & Sember, R. (2004). Global transformations and intimate relations in the 21st century: social science research on sexuality and the emergence of sexual health and sexual rights frameworks. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15, 362–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pereira, C. (2002). Configuring “global”, “national”, and “local” in governance agendas and women's struggles in Nigeria. Social Research, 69, 781–804.Google Scholar
  27. Petchesky, R. (2000). Sexual rights: Inventing a concept, mapping an international practice. In R. Parker, R. M. Barbosa, & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Framing the sexual subject: The politics of gender, sexuality and power (pp. 81–103). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Petchesky, R. (2003). Global prescriptions: Gendering health and human rights. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  29. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwest University Press. Original work published 1932.Google Scholar
  30. Simon, W. (1996). Postmodern sexualities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1999). Sexual scripts. In R. Parker & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Culture, society and sexuality: A reader (pp. 29–38). London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. World Health Organization. (2002). Gender and reproductive health: Glossary. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/gender/glossary.html
  35. Yogyakartaprinciples.org. (2007). The yogyakarta principles: Principles on the application of international human rights law in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity. Retrieved June 22, 2009, from http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/principles_en.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations