Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 31–52

Structured Markovian models for discrete spatial mobile node distribution

  • Fernando Luís Dotti
  • Paulo Fernandes
  • Cristina M. Nunes
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

The study and characterization of node mobility in wireless networks is extremely important to foresee the node distribution in the network, enabling the creation of suitable models, and thus a more accurate prediction of performance and dependability levels.

In this paper we adopt a structured Markovian formalism, namely SAN (Stochastic Automata Networks), to model and analyze two popular mobility models for wireless networks: the Random Waypoint and Random Direction.

Our modeling considers mobility over a discrete space, i.e., over a space divided in a given number of slots, allowing a suitable analytical representation of structured regions. We represent several important aspects of mobility models, such as varying speed and pause times, and several border behaviors that may take place. One, two, and three-dimensional models are presented. For the two-dimensional models, we show that any regular or irregular convex polygon can be modeled, and we describe several routing strategies in two dimensions.

In all cases, the spatial node distribution obtained from the steady state analysis is presented and whenever analogous results over continuous spaces were available in the literature, the comparison with the ones obtained in this paper is shown to be coherent.

Besides showing the suitability of SAN to model this kind of reality, the paper also contributes to new findings for the modeled mobility models over a noncontinuous space.

Keywords

Structured stochastic modeling formalisms Mobile nodes Markovian models 

References

  1. 1.
    Abolhasan M, Wysocki T, Dutkiewicz E (2004) A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw 2(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajmone Marsan M, Conte G, Balbo G (1984) A class of generalized stochastic petri nets for the performance evaluation of multiprocessor systems. ACM Trans Comput Syst 2(2):93–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bansal N, Liu Z (2003) Capacity, delay and mobility in wireless ad-hoc networks. In: IEEE InfocomGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benchaïba M, Bouabdallah A, Badache N, Ahmed-Nacer M (2004) Distributed mutual exclusion algorithms in mobile ad hoc networks: an overview. Oper Syst Rev 38(1):74–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bettstetter C (2001) Mobility modeling in wireless networks: Categorization, smooth movement, and border effects. Mob Comput Commun Rev 5(3):55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bettstetter C (2001) Smooth is better than sharp: a random mobility model for simulation of wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems. ACM, New York, pp 19–27Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bettstetter C, Resta G, Santi P (2003) The node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model for wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 2(3):257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bettstetter C, Hartenstein H, Perez-Cost X (2004) Stochastic properties of the random waypoint mobility model. Wirel Netw 10(5):555–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brenner L, Fernandes P, Sales A (2005) The need for and the advantages of generalized tensor algebra for Kronecker structured representations. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol 6(3–4):52–60Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brenner L, Fernandes P, Plateau B, Sbeity I (2007) PEPS 2007—Stochastic Automata Networks Software Tool. In: International conference on quantitative evaluation of systems (QEST 2007). IEEE Press, New York, pp 163–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Broch J, Maltz DA, Johnson DB, Hu Y, Jetcheva J (1998) A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In: Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM/IEEE int conf on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom). ACM Press, New York, pp 85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buchholz P, Ciardo G, Donatelli S, Kemper P (2000) Complexity of memory-efficient Kronecker operations with applications to the solution of Markov models. INFORMS J Comput 12(3):203–222MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Camp T, Boleng J, Davies V (2002) A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2(5):483–502. Special issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Research, Trends and ApplicationsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choffnes DR, Bustamante FE (2005) An integrated mobility and traffic model for vehicular wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM int. workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks, VANET ’05. ACM, New York, pp 69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chu T, Nikolaidis I (2004) Node density and connectivity properties of the random waypoint model. Comput Commun 27:914–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Czekster RM, Fernandes P, Webber T (2009) GTAEXPRESS: a software package to handle Kronecker descriptors. In: QEST’09: quantitative evaluation of systemsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Czekster RM, Fernandes P, Sales A, Taschetto D, Webber T (2010) Simulation of Markovian models using Bootstrap method. In: Proceedings of the 2010 summer computer simulation conference (SCSC ’10). pp 564–569Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Czekster RM, Fernandes P, Sales A, Webber T (2011) A memory aware heuristic for fast computation of structured Markovian models through tensor product restructuring. Numer Linear Algebra Appl (to appear)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Czekster RM, Fernandes P, Webber T (2011) Efficient vector-descriptor product exploiting time-memory trade-offs. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev (to appear)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Delamare F, Dotti FL, Fernandes P, Nunes CM, Ost LC (2006) Analytical modeling of random waypoint mobility patterns. In: PE-WASUN ’06: proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor and ubiquitous networks. ACM, New York, pp 106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Di W, Xiaofeng Z, Xin W (2006) Analysis of 3-d random direction mobility model for ad hoc network. In: ITS telecommunications proceedings, 6th int conf on, pp 741–744Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doyle SJ, Forde TK, Doyle LE (2006) Spatial stationarity of link statistics in mobile ad hoc network modelling. In: MASCOTS ’06: proceedings of the 14th IEEE international symposium on modeling, analysis, and simulation. IEEE Comput Soc, Washington, pp 43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fuggetta A, Picco GP, Vigna G (1998) Understanding code mobility. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24:342–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    González MC, Hidalgo CA, Barabási A-L (2008) Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453(7196):779–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guérin RA (1987) Channel occupancy time distribution in a cellular radio system. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 36:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haas ZJ, Pearlman MR (1998) The performance of query control schemes for the zone routing protocol. In: ACM SIGCOMM. pp 167–177Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hillston J (1996) A compositional approach to performance modelling. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hyytiä E, Virtamo J (2007) Random waypoint mobility model in cellular networks. Wirel Netw 13(2):177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hyytia E, Lassila P, Virtamo J (2006) Spatial node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model with applications. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 5(6):680–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jardosh A, Belding-Royer E, Almeroth K, Suri S (2003) Towards realistic mobility models for mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking. ACM, New York, pp 217–229Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jardosh A, BeldingRoyer EM, Almeroth KC, Suri S (2003) Towards realistic mobility models for mobile ad hoc networks. In: MobiCom ’03: proceedings of the 9th annual int conf on mobile computing and networking. ACM, New York, pp 217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jayakumar G, Ganapathi G (2008) Reference point group mobility and random waypoint models in performance evaluation of manet routing protocols. J Comput Syst Netw CommunGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kemper P (1996) Numerical analysis of superposed GSPNs. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 22(9):615–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kleinrock L, Silvester J (1978) Optimum transmission radio for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number. In: Proc of the IEEE national telecommunications confGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kumar M, Rajesh RS (2009) Performance analysis of manet routing protocols in different mobility models. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 9(2):22–29Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lassila P, Hyytiä E, Koskinen H (2005) Connectivity properties of random waypoint mobility model for ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the fourth annual Mediterranean workshop on ad hoc networks (Med-Hoc-Net)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Le Boudec J, Vojnovic M (2005) Perfect simulation and stationarity of a class of mobility models. In: INFOCOM 2005. 24th annual joint conf of the IEEE computer and communications societies. Proceedings IEEE, vol 4. IEEE Press, New York, pp 2743–2754Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lin G, Oubir G, Rajaraman R (2004) Mobility models for ad hoc network simulation. In: IEEE infocomGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Malpani N, Welch JL, Vaidya N (2000) Leader election algorithms for mobile ad hoc networks. In: DIALM ’00: proceedings of the 4th international workshop on discrete algorithms and methods for mobile computing and communications. ACM, New York, pp 96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Milner R (1999) Communicating and mobile systems: the π-calculus. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nain P, Towsley D, Liu B, Liu Z (2005) Properties of random direction models. In: IEEE Infocom, pages. IEEE Press, New York, pp 1897–1907Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Navidi W, Camp T (2004) Stationary distributions for the random waypoint mobility model. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 3(1):99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nilsson A (2004) Performance analysis of traffic load and node density in ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 5th European wireless 2004: mobile and wireless systems beyond 3GGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Plateau B (1985) On the stochastic structure of parallelism and synchronization models for distributed algorithms. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 13(2):147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rajaraman R (2002) Topology control and routing in ad hoc networks: a survey. SIGACT News 33(2):60–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Resta G, Santi P (2002) An analysis of the node spatial distribution of the random waypoint mobility model for ad hoc networks. In: POMC ’02: proceedings of the second ACM international workshop on principles of mobile computing. ACM, New York, pp 44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Royer EM, Melliar-Smith PM, Moser LE (2001) An analysis of the optimum node density for ad hoc mobile networks. In: IEEE international conference on communications, vol 3. pp 857–861Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Saha AK, Johnson DB (2004) Modeling mobility for vehicular ad-hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM int. workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks, VANET ’04. ACM, New York, pp 91–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Santi P, Blough DM (2002) An evaluation of connectivity in mobile wireless ad hoc networks. In: DSN ’02: proceedings of the 2002 international conference on dependable systems and networks. IEEE Comput Soc, Washington, pp 89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stewart WJ (2009) Probability, Markov chains, queues, and simulation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wu X, Sadjadpour H, Garcialunaaceves J, Xu H (2008) A hybrid view of mobility in manets: Analytical models and simulation study? Comput Commun 31(16):3810–3821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Computer Society 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Luís Dotti
    • 1
  • Paulo Fernandes
    • 1
  • Cristina M. Nunes
    • 1
  1. 1.FACIN–PUCRSPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations