Skip to main content
Log in

Asymptotically Normal Estimators for Zipf’s Law

  • Published:
Sankhya A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study an infinite urn scheme with probabilities corresponding to a power function. Urns here represent words from an infinitely large vocabulary. We propose asymptotically normal estimators of the exponent of the power function. The estimators use the number of different elements and a few similar statistics. If we use only one of the statistics we need to know asymptotics of a normalizing constant (a function of a parameter). All the estimators are implicit in this case. If we use two statistics then the estimators are explicit, but their rates of convergence are lower than those for estimators with the known normalizing constant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahadur, R.R. (1960). On the number of distinct values in a large sample from an infinite discrete distribution. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India26A, Supp II, 67–75.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, A.D. (2009). Univariate approximations in the infinite occupancy scheme. Alea6, 415–433.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, A.D. and Gnedin, A.V. (2009). Small counts in the infinite occupancy scheme. Electronic. J. Probab.14, 365–384.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Hamou, A., Boucheron, S. and Gassiat, E. (2016). Pattern coding meets censoring: (almost) adaptive coding on countable alphabets. arXiv:1608.08367.

  • Ben-Hamou, A., Boucheron, S. and Ohannessian, M.I. (2017). Concentration inequalities in the infinite urn scheme for occupancy counts and the missing mass, with applications. Bernoulli23, 249–287.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bogachev, L.V., Gnedin, A.V. and Yakubovich, Y.V. (2008). On the variance of the number of occupied boxes. Adv. Appl. Math.40, 401–432.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boonta, S. and Neammanee, K. (2007). Bounds on random infinite urn model. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. Second Series30.2, 121–128.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chebunin, M.G. (2014). Estimation of parameters of probabilistic models which is based on the number of different elements in a sample. Sib. Zh. Ind. Mat.17:3, 135–147. (in Russian).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chebunin, M. and Kovalevskii, A. (2016). Functional central limit theorems for certain statistics in an infinite urn scheme. Statist. Probab. Lett.119, 344–348.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Durieu, O. and Wang, Y. (2016). From infinite urn schemes to decompositions of self-similar Gaussian processes. Electron. J. Probab.21, 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutko, M. (1989). Central limit theorems for infinite urn models. Ann. Probab.17, 1255–1263.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gnedin, A., Hansen, B. and Pitman, J. (2007). Notes on the occupancy problem with infinitely many boxes: general asymptotics and power laws. Probab. Surv.4, 146–171.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, R. and Hitczenko, P. (2009). Gaps in discrete random samples. J. Appl. Probab.46, 1038–1051.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Heaps, H.S. (1978). Information retrieval, computational and theoretical aspects. Academic Press.

  • Herdan, G. (1960). Type-token mathematics. The Hague, Mouton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, H.-K. and Janson, S. (2008). Local limit theorems for finite and infinite urn models. Ann. Probab.36, 992–1022.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S. (1967). Central limit theorems for certain infinite urn schemes. J. Math. Mech.17, 373–401.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Key, E.S. (1992). Rare Numbers. J. Theor. Probab.5, 375–389.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Key, E.S. (1996). Divergence rates for the number of rare numbers. J. Theor. Probab.9, 413–428.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Khmaladze, E.V. (2011). Convergence properties in certain occupancy problems including the Karlin-Rouault law. J. Appl. Probab.48, 1095–1113.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1965). Information theory and psycholinguistics. In Scientific psychology. Basic Books, (B.B. Wolman and E. Nagel, eds.)

  • Muratov, A. and Zuyev, S. (2016). Bit flipping and time to recover. J. Appl. Probab.53, 650–666.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, P.T. (1987). Estimation of Zipf parameters. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.38, 443–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohannessian, M.I. and Dahleh, M.A. (2012). Rare probability estimation under regularly varying heavy tails. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Learning Theory PMLR, pp. 23:21.1–21.24.

  • Petersen, A.M., Tenenbaum, J.N., Havlin, S., Stanley, H.E. and Perc, M. (2012). Languages cool as they expand: allometric scaling and the decreasing need for new words. Scientific Reports 2. Article No 943.

  • Zakrevskaya, N.S. and Kovalevskii, A.P. (2001). One-parameter probabilistic models of text statistics. Sib. Zh. Ind. Mat.4:2, 142–153. (in Russian).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our research was partially supported by RFBR grant 17-01-00683 and by the program of fundamental scientific researches of the SB RAS No. I.1.3., project No. 0314-2016-0008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikhail Chebunin.

Appendix: Functional Central Limit Theorem

Appendix: Functional Central Limit Theorem

Let for t ∈ [0, 1],k ≥ 1

$${Y}_{n,k}^{*}(t) = \frac{{R}_{[nt],k}^{*} - \mathbf{E} {R}_{[nt],k}^{*}}{(\alpha(n))^{1/2}}, Y_{n,k}(t) = \frac{R_{[nt],k} - \mathbf{E} R_{[nt],k}}{(\alpha(n))^{1/2}}. $$

Theorem 4.

Let us assume that (1.2) holds,ν ≥ 1 is integer. Then random process\( \left ((Y^{*}_{n,1}(t), Y_{n,1}(t),\ldots , Y_{n,\nu }(t)), 0 \leq t \leq 1 \right ) \)convergesweakly in the uniform metrics inD(0, 1) to (ν + 1)-dimensionalGaussian process with continuous sample paths, zero expectation and covariancefunction\((c_{ij}(\tau ,t))_{i,j = 0}^{\nu }\),

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} c_{ij}(\tau,t) &=& \frac{\theta \tau^{i} (t-\tau)^{j-i} t^{\theta-j} {\Gamma}(j-\theta)}{i!(j-i)!} - \frac{\theta \tau^{i} t^{j} (t+\tau)^{\theta-i-j} {\Gamma}(i+j-\theta)}{i!j!}\\ && \text{for} 1 \leq i \le j, \tau\leq t,\\ c_{ij}(\tau,t) &=& - \frac{\theta \tau^{i} t^{j} (t+\tau)^{\theta-i-j} {\Gamma}(i+j-\theta)}{i!j!} \text{for} i> j\geq 1, \tau\leq t,\\ c_{00}(\tau,t) &=& \left( (t+\tau)^{\theta}-t^{\theta}\right) {\Gamma}(1-\theta) \text{for} \tau\leq t,\\ c_{i0}(\tau,t) &=& - \frac{\theta \tau^{i} (t+\tau)^{\theta-i} {\Gamma}(i-\theta)}{i!} \text{for} i> 0, \tau\leq t,\\ c_{0j}(\tau,t) &=& \frac{\theta ((t-\tau)^{j} t^{\theta-j} - t^{j} (t+\tau)^{\theta-j}) {\Gamma}(j-\theta)}{j!} \text{for} j>0, \tau\leq t, \end{array} $$

cji(t, τ) = cij(τ, t).

Proof.

Theorem 3 by Chebunin and Kovalevskii (2016) states weak convergence of vector random process \( \left ((Y^{*}_{n,1}(t), \ldots , Y^{*}_{n,\nu }(t)), 0 \leq t \leq 1 \right ) \) in the uniform metrics in D(0, 1) to (ν + 1)-dimensional Gaussian process with continuous sample paths, zero expectation and covariance function \((c^{*}_{ij}(\tau ,t))_{i,j = 0}^{\nu }\).

The main focus of this paper was to prove tightness of components \((Y^{*}_{n,i}(t), 0 \leq t \leq 1 )\) by Poissonization and construction of an appropriate inequality for covariances.

As \(Y_{n,i}(t)=Y^{*}_{n_{i}}(t)-Y^{*}_{n,i-1}(t)\), we state tightness of components (Yn, i,0 ≤ t ≤ 1) and calculate cij(τ, t) by formulas

$$c_{ij}(\tau,t)=c^{*}_{ij}(\tau,t)-c^{*}_{i + 1,j}(\tau,t)-c^{*}_{i,j + 1}(\tau,t) +c^{*}_{i + 1,j + 1}(\tau,t), $$
$$c_{0j}(\tau,t)=c^{*}_{1j}(\tau,t)-c^{*}_{1,j + 1}(\tau,t), c_{i0}(\tau,t)=c^{*}_{i1}(\tau,t)-c^{*}_{i + 1,1}(\tau,t). $$

The proof is complete. □

The limiting (ν + 1)-dimensional Gaussian process is self-similar with Hurst parameter H = 𝜃/2 < 1/2. Its first component coincides in distribution with the first component of the limiting process in Theorem 1 in Durieu and Wang (2016).

We need some specific corollary to calculate limiting variance in Theorem 2.

Corollary 3.

In assumptions of Theorem 4, randomvector\(((Y^{*}_{n,1}(1)\),Yn,1(1)) convergesweakly to a normal one with zero mean and covariance matrix

$${\Gamma}(1-\theta) \left( \begin{array}{cc} 2^{\theta}-1 & -\theta 2^{\theta-1}\\ -\theta 2^{\theta-1} & \theta(1-2^{\theta-2}(1-\theta)) \end{array} \right). $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chebunin, M., Kovalevskii, A. Asymptotically Normal Estimators for Zipf’s Law. Sankhya A 81, 482–492 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-018-0135-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-018-0135-9

Keywords and phrases.

AMS (2000) subject classification.

Navigation