Advertisement

Sankhya A

pp 1–32 | Cite as

Parametric Inference Using Nomination Sampling with an Application to Mercury Contamination in Fish

  • Mohammad Nourmohammadi
  • Mohammad Jafari JozaniEmail author
  • Brad C. Johnson
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Randomized nomination sampling (RNS) is a rank-based sampling technique which has been shown to be effective in several nonparametric studies involving environmental, agricultural, medical and ecological applications. In this paper, we investigate parametric inference using RNS design for estimating an unknown vector of parameters θ in some parametric families of distributions. We examine both maximum likelihood (ML) and method of moments (MM) approaches. We introduce four types of RNS-based data as well as necessary EM algorithms for the ML estimation under each data type, and evaluate the performance of corresponding estimators in estimating θ compared with those based on simple random sampling (SRS). Our results can address many parametric inference problems in reliability theory, sport analytics, fisheries, etc. Theoretical results are augmented with numerical evaluations, where we also study inference based on imperfect ranking. We apply our methods to a real data problem in order to study the distribution of the mercury contamination in fish body using RNS designs.

Keywords

Randomized nomination sampling Method of moments Maximum likelihood Modified maximum likelihood EM algorithm 

AMS (2000) subject classification.

Primary 62G05 Secondary 62D05 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the partial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). We would like to thank two anonymous referees for their useful comments.

References

  1. Al-Odat, M. and Al-Saleh, M.F. (2001). A variation of ranked set sampling. Journal of Applied Statistical Science 10, 2, 137–146.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya, D. and Samaniego, F.J. (2010). Estimating component characteristics from system failure-time data. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 57, 4, 380–389.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhavsar, S.P., Gewurtz, S.B., McGoldrick, D.J., Keir, M.J. and Backus, S.M. (2010). Changes in mercury levels in great lakes fish between 1970s and 2007. Environmental science & technology 44, 9, 3273–3279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyles, R.A. and Samaniego, F.J. (1986). Estimating a distribution function based on nomination sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 396, 1039–1045.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Gemayel, N.M., Stasny, E.A. and Wolfe, D.A. (2010). Optimal ranked set sampling estimation based on medians from multiple set sizes. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 22, 4, 517–527.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghosh, K. and Tiwari, R.C. (2009). A unified approach to variations of ranked set sampling with applications. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 21, 4, 471–485.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Jafari Jozani, M. and Johnson, B.C. (2012). Randomized nomination sampling for finite populations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142, 7, 2103–2115.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Jafari Jozani, M. and Mirkamali, S.J. (2010). Improved attribute acceptance sampling plans based on maxima nomination sampling. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140, 9, 2448–2460.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Jafari Jozani, M. and Mirkamali, S.J. (2011). Control charts for attributes with maxima nominated samples. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141, 7, 2386–2398.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Kvam, P.H. and Samaniego, F.J. (1993). On estimating distribution functions using nomination samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 424, 1317–1322.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. McGoldrick, D.J., Clark, M.G., Keir, M.J., Backus, S.M. and Malecki, M.M. (2010). Canada’s national aquatic biological specimen bank and database. Journal of Great Lakes Research 36, 2, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mehrotra, K. and Nanda, P. (1974). Unbiased estimation of parameters by order statistics in the case of censored samples. Biometrika 61, 3, 601–606.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Nourmohammadi, M., Jafari Jozani, M. and Johnson, B.C. (2014). Confidence intervals for quantiles in finite populations with randomized nomination sampling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 73, 112–128.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Nourmohammadi, M., Jafari Jozani, M. and Johnson, B.C. (2015a). Distribution-free tolerance intervals with nomination samples: Applications to mercury contamination in fish. Statistical Methodology 26, 16–33.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nourmohammadi, M., Jafari Jozani, M. and Johnson, B.C. (2015b). Nonparametric confidence intervals for quantiles with randomized nomination sampling. Sankhya A 77, 2, 408–432.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Samawi, H.M., Ahmed, M.S. and Abu-Dayyeh, W. (1996). Estimating the population mean using extreme ranked set sampling. Biometrical Journal 38, 5, 577–586.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiwari, R.C. (1988). Nonparametric bayes estimation of a distribution under nomination sampling. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on 37, 5, 558–561.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Tiwari, R.C. and Wells, M.T. (1989). Quantile estimation based on nomination sampling. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on 38, 5, 612–614.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Wells, M.T., Tiwari, R.C. et al. (1990). Estimating a distribution function based on minima-nomination sampling,.Google Scholar
  20. Willemain, T.R. (1980). Estimating the population median by nomination sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75, 372, 908–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Statistical Institute 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Statistical Research and Training Center of IranTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations