Exchanging knowledge to improve organic arable farming: an evaluation of knowledge exchange tools with farmer groups across Europe
Organic farming is knowledge intensive. To support farmers in improving yields and organic agriculture systems, there is a need to improve how knowledge is shared. There is an established culture of sharing ideas, successes and failures in farming. The internet and information technologies open-up new opportunities for knowledge exchange involving farmers, researchers, advisors and other practitioners. The OK-Net Arable brought together practitioners from regional Farmer Innovation Groups across Europe in a multi-actor project to explore how online knowledge exchange could be improved. Feedback from the groups was obtained for 35 ‘tools’, defined as end-user materials, such as technical guides, videos and websites informing about practices in organic agriculture. The groups also selected one practice to test on farms, sharing their experiences with others through workshops, exchange visits and through videos. Farmers valued the same key elements in face-to-face exchanges (workshops and visits) as in online materials. These were the opportunity for visual observation, deeper understanding of the context in which a practice was being tried and details about what worked and what did not work. Videos, decision support tools and social media can provide useful mechanisms for taking knowledge exchange online, enabling farmers and researchers to share experiences and practical implications. Visual information, economics, details of the context, successes and failures were considered to be critical factors in good knowledge exchange tools. Online platforms and forums should not be expected to replace but rather to complement face to face knowledge exchange in improving organic farming.
KeywordsKnowledge exchange Internet Peer-to-peer Video Technical guide Organic arable farming
The work presented here was carried out as part of the OK-Net Arable project. This communication only reflects the authors’ views. The Research Executive Agency is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information provided.
We would also like to acknowledge the input from all Farmer Innovation Group Members and Coordinators, from the Project Partners at FIBL, ICROFS and AIAB and from our Co-ordinator Bram Moeskops at IFOAM EU and his team and the helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers.
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 652654.
- Almekinders CJM (2011) The joint development of JM-12.7: a technographic description of the making of a bean variety. Neth J Agric Sci 57(3–4):207–216Google Scholar
- Bliss K, Padel S, Ducottet C (2017) Evaluation of the usefulness of tools and end-user materials to farmers. D 2.2 of OK-Net Arable. Organic Research Centre, NewburyGoogle Scholar
- Brown S (2014) The doodle revolution: unlock the power to think differently. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Butler A, Lobley M (2012) Resource management, knowledge and internet use on farms in South West England: a report for the SWARM knowledge hub. Centre for Rural Policy Research, University of Exeter, ExeterGoogle Scholar
- Caldbeck J, Sumption P (2016) Mind the gap–exploring the yield gaps between conventional and organic arable and potato crops. Organic Research Centre Bulletin 121:9–15Google Scholar
- Cullen B, Amos D, Padel S (2016) Description of farmer innovation groups. D2.1 of OK Net Arable. Organic Research Centre, NewburyGoogle Scholar
- Gócs K, Moeskops B, Rasmussen IA (2018) Plan for continuation of the knowledge platform. D 4.4 of the OK-Net Arable Project. IFOAM-EU, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Knickel K, Tisenkopfs T, Peter S (2009) Innovation processes in agriculture and rural development: results of a cross-national analysis of the situation in seven countries, research gaps and recommendations. IN-SIGHT: strengthening innovation processes for growth and development (FP6 SSP: 44510)Google Scholar
- Micheloni C, Bortolussi S, Conder M, Moeskops B, Padel S, Willer H (2017) Collection of identified and developed end-user and education material. Deliverable 3.3 of the OK-Net Arable Project. AIAB, RomaGoogle Scholar
- Mohamad R, Al Bitar L, Alwanney D, Madzari S (2018) Facilitated and self-learning courses, D 4.2 of OK-Net Arable. IAM- CHEAM, BariGoogle Scholar
- Moschitz H, Tisenkopfs T, Brunori G, Home R, Kunda I, Sumane S (2014) Final report of the Solinsa project. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, FrickGoogle Scholar
- Niggli U et al (2016) Organic knowledge network arable - D.3.1 state-of-the-art research results and best practices. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, FrickGoogle Scholar
- Ortolani L, Micheloni C (2016) Identification of the best methods for learning and knowledge exchange. D 3.2 of OK- net arable. AIAB, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Röling N (1990) The agricultural research - technology interface a knowledge systems perspective. In: Kaimowitz D (ed) Making the link: agricultural research and technology transfer in developing countries. Westview Press, with International Service for National Agricultural Research, Boulder, pp 1–42Google Scholar
- Röös E, Mie A, Wivstad M, Salomon E, Johansson B, Gunnarsson S, Wallenbeck A, Hoffmann R, Nilsson U, Sundberg C, Watson CA (2018) Risks and opportunities of increasing yields in organic farming. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 38(14). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0489-3