Advertisement

Organic Agriculture

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 159–171 | Cite as

Soybeans in high latitudes: effects of Bradyrhizobium inoculation in Northwest Germany and southern West Siberia

  • Insa KühlingEmail author
  • Bianka Hüsing
  • Nina Bome
  • Dieter Trautz
Article

Abstract

In regions around the current high-latitude boundaries of agricultural production, the effects of climate change are likely to affect future growing conditions. Specifically for soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), this leads to a northward shift of the northernmost limit for cultivation. In two high-latitude regions with cold growing conditions (northwest Germany and southern West Siberia, Russia), similar field trials were conducted under different climate conditions (temperate oceanic, temperate continental). The effect of soybean seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum was investigated in comparison to untreated control in five field site-years under organic farming conditions. SPAD meter readings were used to indicate differences in leaf chlorophyll content between inoculation and control at three phenological development stages. To make SPAD values from different varieties and development stages comparable, effect sizes (‘Hedges’ d’ of inoculation against control) were calculated. Inoculation was always successful, and significant numbers of active nodules developed only with inoculation. Effect sizes of SPAD values were significantly positive in inoculated plots at the beginning of seed filling but did not differ earlier. Except for the warmest site-year, inoculation did not affect seed yield. Protein content was significantly higher with inoculation at most varieties tested in Germany but only once in Russia. Protein yield was only in the warmest site-year significantly higher with inoculation. Under cold growing conditions of high-latitude regions, temperature sums seemed to limit soybean yield and the effectiveness of inoculation with B. japonicum. To implement soybeans as legumes in organic farming crop rotations, nevertheless, inoculation is mandatory, since soils at high latitudes lack soy-specific rhizobia bacteria.

Keywords

Glycine max Nodulation Low root zone temperature Climate change SPAD-502 Organic agriculture 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The trials at BK (RUS) were conducted as part of project SASCHA (‘Sustainable land management and adaptation strategies to climate change for the Western Siberian grain belt’). We are grateful for funding by the German Government, Federal Ministry of Education and Research within their SLM funding framework (funding reference 01LL0906D). The trials at WH (GER) took place within the project ‘Expansion of soybean cultivation in Germany through adaptation by breeding as well as optimization of crop production and processing technology’ funded by the German Government, Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture within their BÖLN framework (funding reference 11NA002). We thank M. Kohlbrecher, M. Vergara and T. Zurheide for data collection at WH (GER) and A. Simerly for English language improvement. Finally, we acknowledge the valuable anonymous reviewer comments that helped to improve the manuscript.

Supplementary material

13165_2017_181_MOESM1_ESM.doc (112 kb)
Table S1. Mean values (± standard error) for nodulation (number of nodules during full bloom (R2)), seed yield, thousand seed weight (TSW), protein content and protein yield for the tested varieties at Waldhof (WH GER) and Biostation Kuchak (BK RUS). Multiple comparisons with Tukey HSD-test (p=0.05), no difference between same letters within each year (DOC 111 kb).
13165_2017_181_MOESM2_ESM.doc (82 kb)
Table S2. Mean effect sizes of all varieties at the three development stages (V3: third-node, R3: beginning pod, R5: beginning seed) and mean effect sizes of all stages for each variety at the two study sites Waldhof (WH GER) and Biostation Kuchak (BK RUS). n.s.: not significant, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***:p<0.001 (DOC 81 kb).

References

  1. Albareda M, Rodríguez-Navarro DN, Temprano FJ (2009) Soybean inoculation: dose, N fertilizer supplementation and rhizobia persistence in soil. F Crop Res 113:352–356. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appunu C, Sen D, Singh MK, Dhar B (2008) Variation in symbiotic performance of Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains and soybean cultivars under field conditions. J Cent Eur Agric 9:169–174Google Scholar
  3. Danso SKA, Bowen GD (1989) Methods of inoculation and how they influence nodulation pattern and nitrogen fixation using two contrasting strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Soil Biol Biochem 21:1053–1058. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(89)90043-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dashti N, Zhang F, Hynes R, Smith DL (1998) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria accelerate nodulation and increase nitrogen fixation activity by field growth soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under short season conditons. Plant Soil 200:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Mendiburu F (2014) agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. http://cran.r-project.org/package=agricolae. Accessed 12 Aug 2012
  6. DWD (2015) Deutscher Wetterdienst: climate dataset—archive daily data Osnabrück. http://www.dwd.de. Accessed 5 Jan 2015
  7. Egli DB (1993) Cultivar maturity and potential yield of soybean. F Crop Res 32:147–158. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(93)90027-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egli DB (2011) Time and the productivity of agronomic crops and cropping systems. Agron J 103:743–750. doi: 10.2134/agronj2010.0508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Union (2009) Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feedGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO (2004) What is agrobiodiversity? http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5609e/y5609e01.htm. Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  11. FAO (2014) Food and Agriculture Organization: world reference base for soil resources 2014 international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Fehr WR, Caviness CE (1977) Stages of soybean development. Cooperative Extension Service; Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, AmesGoogle Scholar
  13. Fritschi FB, Ray JD (2007) Soybean leaf nitrogen, chlorophyll content, and chlorophyll a/b ratio. Photosynthetica 45:92–98. doi: 10.1007/s11099-007-0014-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gamzikov GP, Shott PR, Kozhemyakov AP (2008) Nitrogen-fixing ability of traditional and new pulse crops in western Siberia. Russ Agric Sci 34:96–98. doi: 10.3103/S1068367408020092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gass T, Schori A, Fossati A et al (1996) Cold tolerance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) during the reproductive phase. Eur J Agron 5:71–88. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(96)02011-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groppa MD, Zawoznik MS, Tomaro ML (1998) Effect of co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Azospirillum brasilense on soybean plants. Eur J Soil Biol 34:75–80. doi: 10.1016/S1164-5563(99)90004-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gwata ET, Wofford DS, Pfahler PL, Boote KJ (2004) Genetics of promiscuous nodulation in soybean: nodule dry weight and leaf color score. J Hered 95:154–157. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esh017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardarson G, Golbs M, Danso SKA (1989) Nitrogen fixation in soybean (Glycine max L. merrill) as affected by nodulation patterns. Soil Biol Biochem 21:783–787. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(89)90171-5
  19. Herridge D, Rose I (2000) Breeding for enhanced nitrogen fixation in crop legumes. F Crop Res 65:229–248. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00089-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hume DJ, Shelp BJ (1990) Superior performance of the hup—Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain-532C in Ontario soybean field trails. Can J Plant Sci 70:661–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hymowitz T (2004) Speciation and cytogenetics. In American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America (Eds.): soybeans: improvement. Production and Uses, Madison, pp 97–136Google Scholar
  22. Jia H, Jiang B, Wu C et al (2014) Maturity group classification and maturity locus genotyping of early-maturing soybean varieties from high-latitude cold regions. PLoS One 9:e94139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094139 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Kersebaum KC, Nendel C (2014) Site-specific impacts of climate change on wheat production across regions of Germany using different CO2 response functions. Eur J Agron 52(Part A):22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King CA, Purcell LC (2001) Soybean nodule size and relationship to nitrogen fixation response to water deficit. Crop Sci 41:1099–1107. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.4141099x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kiselev S, Romashkin R, Nelson GC et al (2013) Russia’s Food security and climate change: looking into the future. Econ Open-Access, Open- Assess E-Journal 7:2013–2039. doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2013-39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurosaki H, Yumoto S (2003) Effects of low temperature and shading during flowering on the yield components in soybeans. Plant Prod Sci 6:17–23. doi: 10.1626/pps.6.17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Legros T, Smith DL (1994) Root zone temperature sensitivity of nitrogen fixing and nitrate-supplied soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv maple arrow] and lupin (Lupinus albus L. cv ultra) plants. Environ Exp Bot 34:117–127. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(94)90031-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynch DH, Smith DL (1993) Soybean (Glycine max) modulation and N2-fixation as affected by exposure to a low root-zone temperature. Physiol Plant 88:212–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb05491.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynch DH, Smith DL (1994) The effects of low root-zone temperature stress on two soybean (Glycine max) genotypes when combined with Bradyrhizobium strains of varying geographic origin. Physiol Plant 90:105–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02199.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ma BL, Morrison MJ, Voldeng HD (1995) Leaf greenness and photosynthetic rates in soybean. Crop Sci 35:1411–1414. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500050025x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maracchi G, Sirotenko O, Bindi M (2005) Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the temperate regions: Europe. Clim Chang 70:117–135. doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-5939-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markwell J, Osterman JC, Mitchell JL (1995) Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynth Res 46:467–472. doi: 10.1007/BF00032301 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Masciarelli O, Llanes AA, Luna V (2014) A new PGPR co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum enhances soybean nodulation. Microbiol Res 169:609–615. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthews DJ, Hayes P (1982) Effect of root zone temperature on early growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation in soya beans. J Agric Sci 98:371–376. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600041915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McMaster GS, Wilhem WW (1997) Growing degree days: one equation, two interpretations. Agric For Meteorol 87:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meghvansi MK, Prasad K, Harwani D, Mahna SK (2008) Response of soybean cultivars toward inoculation with three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium japonicum in the alluvial soil. Eur J Soil Biol 44:316–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Montañez A, Danso SKA, Hardarson G (1995) The effect of temperature on nodulation and nitrogen fixation by five Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains. Appl Soil Ecol 2:165–174. doi: 10.1016/0929-1393(95)00052-M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82:591–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Oberson A, Nanzer S, Bosshard C et al (2007) Symbiotic N2 fixation by soybean in organic and conventional cropping systems estimated by 15N dilution and 15N natural abundance. Plant Soil 290:69–83. doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-9122-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oikawa S, Miyagi KM, Hikosaka K et al (2010) Interactions between elevated CO2 and N2-fixation determine soybean yield-a test using a non-nodulated mutant. Plant Soil 330:163–172. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0189-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007) Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1633–1644. doi: 10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing R. Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org/
  43. Salvagiotti F, Cassman KG, Specht JE et al (2008) Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: a review. F Crop Res 108:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scialabba NE-H, Müller-Lindenlauf M (2010) Organic agriculture and climate change. Renew Agric Food Syst 25:158–169. doi: 10.1017/S1742170510000116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silva LR, Pereira MJ, Azevedo J et al (2013) Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum enhances the organic and fatty acids content of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) seeds. Food Chem 141:3636–3648. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sinclair TR, Boerma HR, Specht JE, Sinclair TR (2004) Improved carbon and nitrogen assimilation for increased yield. In: Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses, 3rd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 537–568Google Scholar
  47. Sirotenko O, Abashina H, Pavlova V (1997) Sensitivity of the Russian agriculture to changes in climate, CO2 and tropospheric ozone concentrations and soil fertility. Clim Chang 36:217–232. doi: 10.1023/A:1005320521321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephens JHG, Rask HM (2000) Inoculant production and formulation. F Crop Res 65:249–258. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00090-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tchebakova NM, Parfenova EI, Lysanova GI, Soja AJ (2011) Agroclimatic potential across central Siberia in an altered twenty-first century. Environ Res Lett 6:45207. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teklić T, Vratarić M, Sudarić A et al (2009) Relationships among chloroplast pigments concentration and chlorophyll meter readings in soybean under influence of foliar magnesium application. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 40:706–725. doi: 10.1080/00103620802697939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thompson JA, Schweitzer LE, Nelson RL (1996) Association of specific leaf weight, an estimate of chlorophyll, and chlorophyll concentration with apparent photosynthesis in soybean. Photosynth Res 49:1–10. doi: 10.1007/BF00029422 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. TUTIEMPO (2016) Climate Tyumen. http://en.tutiempo.net/climate/2015/ws-283670.html. Accessed 2 Jan 2016
  53. Uddling J, Gelang-Alfredsson J, Piikki K, Pleijel H (2007) Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynth Res 91:37–46. doi: 10.1007/s11120-006-9077-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36:1–48. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.121108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vollmann J, Walter H, Sato T, Schweiger P (2011) Digital image analysis and chlorophyll metering for phenotyping the effects of nodulation in soybean. Comput Electron Agric 75:190–195. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weaver RW, Frederick LR (1972) Effect of inoculum size on nodulation of Glycine max (L.) Merril, variety Ford. Agron J 64:597–599. doi: 10.2134/agronj1972.00021962006400050014x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wheeler T, von Braun J (2013) Climate change impacts on global food security. Science 341(80):508–513. doi: 10.1126/science.1239402 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wu T, Li J, Wu C et al (2015) Analysis of the independent- and interactive-photo-thermal effects on soybean flowering. J Integr Agric 14:622–632. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60856-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zabel F, Putzenlechner B, Mauser W et al (2014) Global agricultural land resources—a high resolution suitability evaluation and its perspectives until 2100 under climate change conditions. PLoS One 9:e107522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107522 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Zapata F, Danso S, Hardarson G, Fried M (1987) Time course of nitrogen fixation in field-grown soybean using nitrogen-15 methodology. Agron J 79:172–176. doi: 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900010035x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang F, Lynch DH, Smith DL (1995) Impact of low root temperatures in soybean [Glycine max. (L.) Merr.] on nodulation and nitrogen fixation. Environ Exp Bot 35:279–285. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(95)00017-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang F, Dashti N, Hynes RKK, Smith DL (1997) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] growth and physiology at suboptimal root zone temperatures. Ann Bot 79:243–249. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang H, Prithiviraj B, Charles TC et al (2003) Low temperature tolerant Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains allowing improved nodulation and nitrogen fixation of soybean in a short season (cool spring) area. Eur J Agron 19:205–213. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00038-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zimmer S, Messmer M, Haase T et al (2016) Effects of soybean variety and Bradyrhizobium strains on yield, protein content and biological nitrogen fixation under cool growing conditions in Germany. Eur J Agron 72:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Working Group Sustainable Agro-EcosystemsOsnabrück University of Applied SciencesOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Institute of GeographyOsnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany
  3. 3.Institute of BiologyTyumen State UniversityTyumenRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations