Organic Agriculture

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 199–207 | Cite as

ORGANIC 3.0—the vision of the global organic movement and the need for scientific support

Article

Abstract

Organic 3.0 is the title of a vision and a strategy that the organic movement provides for the organic sector development. It is the result of a broad-based multi-stakeholder discussion from 2013 until 2016 under the lead of IFOAM - Organics International, the global organic umbrella. The process of its articulation has been supported by research and it became obvious that further strong research support is required to implement the Organic 3.0 strategies. This paper lays the foundation for deepened research and summarizes how the global organic movement sees its future developing under the title Organic 3.0, in which 1.0 marks the time of the organic pioneers and 2.0 the present situation and systems with certified organic agriculture that has an uptake of about 1% of global agriculture and food markets. Organic 3.0 aims at better contributing to solve challenges in the food chain such as healthy and affordable food for everyone, minimized environmental and food pollution, fairness for producers, high animal welfare, and efficiency in resource utilization. Organic 3.0 is characterized by its objective, a new organic positioning and six innovative features.

Keywords

Organic 3.0 IFOAM - Organics International Organic agriculture research Organic movement 

References

  1. Altieri M, Nicholls C, Henao A, Lana M (2015) Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agron Sustain Dev 35:869–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbenz M, Gould D, Stopes C (2015) Organic 3.0—for truly sustainable farming and consumption, IFOAM Organics International, Bonn and SOAAN, BonnGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbenz M, Gould D, Stopes C (2016) Organic 3.0—for truly sustainable farming and consumption, 2nd updated edition, IFOAM Organics International, Bonn and SOAAN, BonnGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouagnimbek H (2014) Global comparative study on interactions between traditional social processes and participatory guarantee systems (PGS). www.ifoam.bio/en/global-comparative-pgs-study
  5. Huber B, Schmid O, Napo-Bitantem G (2015) Standards and regulations. In: Willer H, Lernoud J (eds) The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2015. FIBL-IFOAM Report, Frick and Bonn. Research institute of organic agriculture (FiBL), Frick and IFOAM Organics International. Bonn, p 126–133Google Scholar
  6. IFOAM – Organics International (2014) Best practice guideline for agriculture and value chains, developed by SOAAN and approved by IFOAM–Organics International. www.ifoam.bio/en/organic-landmarks/best-practice-guideline-agriculture-and-value-chains
  7. Niggli U (2015) Incorporating agroecology into organic research—an ongoing challenge. Sustainable Agriculture Research 4(3):149–157. doi:10.5539/sar.v4n3p149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rahmann G, Ardakani RM, Bàrberi P et al (2016) Organic Agriculture 3.0 is innovation with research. Org Agr. doi:10.1007/s13165-016-0171-5 Google Scholar
  9. Strotdrees S, Strotdrees L, Braun S, Rahmann G (2011) Ökolandbau 3.0? Landbauforsch SH 354:5–8 Thünen-Institut, Braunschweig/TrenthorstGoogle Scholar
  10. Willer H, Lernoud J (eds) (2016) The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2016. FIBL-IFOAM Report, Frick and BonnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IFOAM - Organics InternationalBonnGermany
  2. 2.EcoS ConsultancyNewburyUK

Personalised recommendations