Advertisement

Organic Agriculture

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 73–81 | Cite as

From selection to cultivation with the support of all stakeholders: the first registration in France of two winter bread wheat varieties after value for cultivation and use evaluation in organic farming systems

  • B. RollandEmail author
  • L. Fontaine
  • A. Mailliard
  • O. Gardet
  • E. Heumez
  • P. Walczak
  • A. Le Campion
  • F.-X. Oury
Article
  • 181 Downloads

Abstract

Winter bread wheat is the most important cash crop for French organic farmers. The choice of its varieties farmers cultivate is therefore very important. Most of the available varieties were initially bred for intensive “conventional” farming systems (with high inputs of mineral fertilizers and pesticides). Thus, screening current and novel varieties for organic conditions is necessary to identify varieties suitable for organic farming conditions in a short-term experiment. After 18 years of breeding and screening in a combination of both low input and organic crop management systems, the two pure lines Hendrix and Skerzzo were registered in the official French catalogue with the special mention “organic farming.” The acreages of commercial seed production to be sold to organic farmers continuously increased from 120, 139 to 160 ha in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively. This successful process was made possible due to the support of the whole agricultural organic economic sector associated with the initiative.

Keywords

Variety Winter bread wheat Plant breeding Value for cultivation and use (VCU) Organic farming 

Abbreviations

ANMF

French millers organization

BIPEA

French bread-making quality test (NFV03-716)

BPS

Superior bread-making wheat

CTPS

French Permanent Technical Committee for the Selection of Cultivated Plants

GEVES

Variety and Seed Study and Control Group

GPD

Grain protein deviation

INRA

French National Institute for Agricultural Research

IPM

Integrated pest management

ITAB

French Technical Institute of Organic Farming

RSE

Residual standard error

VCU

Value for cultivation and use

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge all farmers, organizations, and people who managed the organic variety trials: Chambres d’agriculture (Maine-et-Loire, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Ile-de-France, and Picardie), Arvalis-Institut du Végétal (Jeu-les-Bois and Ouzouer-le-Marché), GRAB Haute-Normandie, Biocer, INRA (UE Auzeville, Lusignan, Le Moulon, Rennes, and UMR Rennes), and Agri-Obtentions farm in Orsonville.

CPER Etat-Bretagne has supported this program since 2002. Thank you to Gaël Le Trionnaire for English writing advice and to Leigh Gebbie for final English proof reading. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable advice.

References

  1. Annicchiarico P, Chiapparino E, Perenzin M (2010) Response of common wheat varieties to organic and conventional production systems across Italian locations, and implications for selection. Field Crop Res 116:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertholdsson NO (2005) Early vigour and allelopathy—two useful traits for enhanced barley and wheat competitiveness against weeds. Weed Res 45:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CTPS (2015) Règlement technique d’examen des variétés de céréales à paille en vue de leur inscription au Catalogue Officiel Français. http://cat.geves.info/CAT_WEB/Data/RT_cereales.pdf
  4. Drews S, Neuhoff D, Köpke U (2009) Weed suppression ability of three winter wheat varieties at different row spacing under organic farming conditions. Weed Res 49:526–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fontaine L, Rolland B, Bernicot MH (2008) Contribution to organic breeding programmes of wheat variety testing in organic farming in France. Proceedings 16th IFOAM Organic World Congress, 2nd ISOFAR Scientific Conference, vol 1 p.692–695, 18–20 June 2008, Modena, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  6. Lammerts van Bueren ET, Jones SS, Tamm L, Murphy K, Myers JR, Leifert C, Messmer MM (2011) The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: a review. NJAS-Wagen J Life Sci 58:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Le Campion A, Oury FX, Morlais JY, Walczak P, Bataillon P, Gardet O, Gilles S, Pichard A, Rolland B (2014) Is low-input management system a good selection environment to screen winter wheat genotypes adapted to organic farming? Euphytica 199:41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Löschenberger F, Fleck A, Grausgruber H, Hetzendorfer H, Hof G, Lafferty J, Marn M, Neumayer A, Pfaffinger G, Birschitzky J (2008) Breeding for organic agriculture: the example of winter wheat in Austria. Euphytica 163:469–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Monaghan JM, Snape JW, Chojecki AJS, Kettlewell PS (2001) The use of grain protein deviation for identifying wheat cultivars with high grain protein concentration and yield. Euphytica 122:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Muellner AE, Mascher F, Schneider D, Ittu G, Toncea I, Rolland B, Löschenberger F (2014) Refining breeding methods for organic and low-input agriculture: analysis of an international winter wheat ring test. Euphytica 199:81–95. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1169-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Murphy KM, Campbell KG, Lyon SR, Jones SS (2007) Evidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crops Res 102:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oury FX, Godin C (2007) Yield and grain protein concentration in bread wheat: how to use the negative relationship between the two characters to identify favourable genotypes? Euphytica 157:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oury FX, Chiron H, Faye A, Gardet O, Giraud A, Heumez E, Rolland B, Rousset M, Trottet M, Charmet G, Branlard G (2010) The prediction of bread wheat quality: joint use of the phenotypic information brought by technological tests and the genetic information brought by HMW and LMW glutenin subunits. Euphytica 171–1:87–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Perderson TM (2012) Organic VCU testing: current status in 16 European countries, Knowledge Center for Agriculture, 48 pGoogle Scholar
  15. Prieur P (2004) Qualité technologique et sanitaire des blés biologiques : premiers résultats d’une étude en Midi-Pyrénées. AlterAgri 66:4–9Google Scholar
  16. Przystalski M, Thiemt E, Rolland B, Ericson L, Osman A, Østergård H, Levy L, Wolfe M, Büchse A, Piepho HP, Krajewski P (2008) Comparing the performance of cereal varieties in organic and non-organic cropping systems in different European countries? Euphytica 163:417–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rolland B, Le Campion A, Oury FX (2012) Pourquoi sélectionner de nouvelles variétés de blé tendre adaptées à l’agriculture biologique ? Courrier de l’Environnement de l’INRA 62:71–85Google Scholar
  18. Schwärzel R, Levy L, Menzi M, Anders M, Winzeler H, Dörnte J (2006) Comparaison de deux réseaux d’essais variétaux de blé d’automne en cultures biologique et extensive. Revue Suisse d’Agriculture 38:35–40Google Scholar
  19. Worthington M, Reberg-Horton SC, Brown-Guedira G, Jordan D, Weisz R, Murphy JP (2015) Morphological traits associated with weed-suppressive ability of winter wheat against Italian ryegrass. Crop Sci 55:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Rolland
    • 1
    Email author
  • L. Fontaine
    • 2
  • A. Mailliard
    • 3
  • O. Gardet
    • 4
  • E. Heumez
    • 5
  • P. Walczak
    • 6
  • A. Le Campion
    • 1
  • F.-X. Oury
    • 7
  1. 1.INRAUMR1349 IGEPPLe RheuFrance
  2. 2.ITAB, Institut Technique de l’Agriculture BiologiqueAngers Cedex 02France
  3. 3.GEVES, Groupe d’Etudes des Variétés et des Semences SEVLa PouezeFrance
  4. 4.Agri-ObtentionsGuyancourtFrance
  5. 5.INRAUE Grandes Cultures Innovation EnvironnementEstrées-MonsFrance
  6. 6.INRAUE Fourrages et EnvironnementLusignanFrance
  7. 7.INRAUMR 1095 GDECClermont-FerrandFrance

Personalised recommendations