Advertisement

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 819–830 | Cite as

The Teaching Instinct

  • Cecilia I. Calero
  • A. P. Goldin
  • M. Sigman
Article

Abstract

Teaching allows human culture to exist and to develop. Despite its significance, it has not been studied in depth by the cognitive neurosciences. Here we propose two hypotheses to boost the claim that teaching is a human instinct, and to expand our understanding of how teaching occurs as a dynamic bi-directional relation within the teacher-learner dyad. First, we explore how children naturally use ostensive communication when teaching; allowing them to be set in the emitter side of natural pedagogy. Then, we hypothesize that the capacity to teach may precede to even have a mature metacognition and, we argue that a teacher will benefit from the interaction with her student, improving her understanding on both contents of knowledge: her own and her student’s. Thus, we propose that teaching may be the driving force of metacognitive development and may be occurring as an instinct from very early ages.

References

  1. Akagi, K. 2012. Development of teaching behavior in typically developing children and children with autism. In CARLS series of advanced study of logic and sensibility, 425–435. Tokyo: Keio University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Apperly, I.A., and S.A. Butterfill. 2009. Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review 116 (4): 953.Google Scholar
  3. Ashley, J., and M. Tomasello. 1998. Cooperative problem-solving and teaching in preschoolers. Social Development 7 (2): 143–163.Google Scholar
  4. Bargh, J.A., and Y. Schul. 1980. On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology 72 (5): 593.Google Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. 1991. Precursors to a theory of mind: Understanding attention in others. Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading 1: 233–251.Google Scholar
  6. Bensalah, L., M. Olivier, and N. Stefaniak. 2012. Acquisition of the concept of teaching and its relationship with theory of mind in French 3- to 6-year-olds. Teaching and Teacher Education 28: 303–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.008.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman-Perrott, L., H. Davis, K. Vannest, L. Williams, C. Greenwood, and R. Parker. 2013. Academic benefits of peer tutoring: A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review 42 (1): 39.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd, B.A., M.A. Conroy, G.R. Mancil, T. Nakao, and P.J. Alter. 2007. Effects of circumscribed interests on the social behaviors of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 37 (8): 1550–1561.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, D.L., and P.H. Winne. 1995. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245–281.Google Scholar
  10. Calero, C.I., A. Zylberberg, J. Ais, M. Semelman, and M. Sigman. 2015. Young children are natural pedagogues. Cognitive Development 35: 65–78.Google Scholar
  11. Charman, T., S. Baron-Cohen, J. Swettenham, G. Baird, A. Cox, and A. Drew. 2000. Testing joint attention, imitation, and play as infancy precursors to language and theory of mind. Cognitive Development 15 (4): 481–498.Google Scholar
  12. Corriveau, K.H., S. Ronfard, and Y.K. Cui. 2017. Cognitive mechanisms associated with children’s selective teaching. Review of Philosophy and Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0343-6.Google Scholar
  13. Csibra, G. 2010. Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind & Language 25 (2): 141–168.Google Scholar
  14. Csibra, G., and G. Gergely. 2006. Social learning and social cognition: The case for pedagogy. Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Attention and performance XXI 21: 249–274.Google Scholar
  15. Csibra, G., and G. Gergely. 2009. Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (4): 148–153.Google Scholar
  16. Csibra, G., and G. Gergely. 2011. Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366 (1567): 1149–1157.Google Scholar
  17. Davis-Unger, A.C., and S.M. Carlson. 2008a. Development of teaching skills and relations to theory of mind in preschoolers. Journal of Cognition and Development 9 (1): 26–45.Google Scholar
  18. Davis-Unger, A.C., and S.M. Carlson. 2008b. Children’s teaching: Relations to theory of mind and executive function. Mind, Brain, and Education 2: 128–135.Google Scholar
  19. De Backer, L., H. Van Keer, and M. Valcke. 2012. Exploring the potential impact of reciprocal peer tutoring on higher education students’ metacognitive knowledge and regulation. Instructional Science 40 (3): 559–588.Google Scholar
  20. Diamond, A. 2013. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology 64: 135–168.Google Scholar
  21. Dineen, J.P., H.B. Clark, and T.R. Risley. 1977. Peer tutoring among elementary students: Educational benefits to the tutor. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 10 (2): 231–238.Google Scholar
  22. Duran, D. 2017. Learning-by-teaching. Evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (5): 476–484.Google Scholar
  23. Efklides, A. 2008. Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist 13 (4): 277–287.Google Scholar
  24. Follmer, D.J. 2018. Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist 53 (1):1–19.Google Scholar
  25. Franchak, J.M., and K.E. Adolph. 2012. What infants know and what they do: Perceiving possibilities for walking through openings. Developmental Psychology 48 (5): 1254.Google Scholar
  26. Gergely, G., and G. Csibra. 2003. Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naıve theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (7): 287–292.Google Scholar
  27. Gergely, G., and G. Csibra. 2005. The social construction of the cultural mind: Imitative learning as a mechanism of human pedagogy. Interaction Studies 6 (3): 463–481.Google Scholar
  28. Gergely, G., and G. Csibra. 2006. Sylvia’s recipe: Human culture, imitation, and pedagogy. In Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and human interaction, ed. N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson, 229–255. London: Berg Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gergely, G., K. Egyed, and I. Király. 2007. On pedagogy. Developmental Science 10 (1): 139–146.Google Scholar
  30. Goldin, A.P., M.J. Hermida, D.E. Shalom, M.E. Costa, M. Lopez-Rosenfeld, M.S. Segretin, D. Fernández-Slezak, S.J. Lipina, and M. Sigman. 2014. Far transfer to language and math of a short software-based gaming intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (17): 6443–6448.Google Scholar
  31. Gourgey, A. 1998. Metacognition in basic skills instruction. Instructional Science 26: 81–96.Google Scholar
  32. Heyes, C.M., and C.D. Frith. 2014. The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science 344 (6190): 1243091.Google Scholar
  33. Hogan, D.M., and J.R.H. Tudge. 1999. Implications of Vygotsky’s theory for peer learning. In Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, ed. A.M. O’Donnell and A. King, 39–65. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Jurado, M.B., and M. Rosselli. 2007. The elusive nature of executive functions: A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychology Review 17 (3): 213–233.Google Scholar
  35. Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1985. Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and cognitive processes 1 (1): 61–85.Google Scholar
  36. Kim, S., C.W. Kalish, K. Weisman, M.V. Johnson, and K. Shutts. 2016. Young children choose to inform previously knowledgeable others. Journal of Cognition and Development 17 (2): 320–340.Google Scholar
  37. Kline, M.A. 2015. How to learn about teaching: An evolutionary framework for the study of teaching behavior in humans and other animals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38.Google Scholar
  38. Koenig, M.A., and P.L. Harris. 2005. Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development 76 (6): 1261–1277.Google Scholar
  39. Koriat, A., and R. Ackerman. 2010. Choice latency as a cue for children’s subjective confidence in the correctness of their answers. Developmental Science 13 (3): 441–453.Google Scholar
  40. Krebs, S.S., and C.M. Roebers. 2010. Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking. British Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3): 325–340.Google Scholar
  41. Kruger, A., and M. Tomasello. (1996). Cultural learning and learning culture. In Handbook of education and human development: New models of teaching, learning, and schooling, ed. D. Olson. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Liszkowski, U., M. Carpenter, T. Striano, and M. Tomasello. 2006. 12-and 18-month-olds point to provide information for others. Journal of Cognition and Development 7 (2): 173–187.Google Scholar
  43. Liszkowski, U., M. Carpenter, and M. Tomasello. 2008. Twelve-month-olds communicate helpfully and appropriately for knowledgeable and ignorant partners. Cognition 108 (3): 732–739.Google Scholar
  44. Lockl, K., and W. Schneider. 2002. Developmental trends in children's feeling-of-knowing judgements. International Journal of Behavioral Development 26 (4): 327–333.Google Scholar
  45. Lucchina, L. Pochinki, N. Denham, P. Sigman, M. and Calero, C.I. 2017. Words, hands or looks? Understanding teaching strategies in children with cochlear implants. Poster presented at the Argentinean Society for Neurocience.Google Scholar
  46. Metcalfe, J. 2009. Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 (3): 159–163.Google Scholar
  47. Metcalfe, J., and B. Finn. 2013. Metacognition and control of study choice in children. Metacognition and learning 8 (1): 19–46.Google Scholar
  48. Mevorach, M., and S. Strauss. 2012. Teacher educators’ in-action mental models in different teaching situations. Teachers and Teaching 18 (1): 25–41.Google Scholar
  49. Mischel, W., O. Ayduk, M.G. Berman, B.J. Casey, I.H. Gotlib, J. Jonides, E. Kross, T. Teslovich, N.L. Wilson, V. Zayas, and Y. Shoda. 2010. ‘Willpower’over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 6 (2): 252–256.Google Scholar
  50. Nadig, A., I. Lee, L. Singh, K. Bosshart, and S. Ozonoff. 2010. How does the topic of conversation affect verbal exchange and eye gaze? A comparison between typical development and high-functioning autism. Neuropsychologia 48 (9): 2730–2739.Google Scholar
  51. Olson, D.R., and J.S. Bruner. 1996. Folk psychology and folk pedagogy. The handbook of education and Human Development: 9–27.Google Scholar
  52. Onishi, K.H., and R. Baillargeon. 2005. Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308 (5719): 255–258.Google Scholar
  53. Pasquinelli, E., T. Zalla, K. Gvodzic, C. Potier-Watkins, and M. Piazza. 2015. Mind, brain, and teaching: Some directions for future research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38: E54.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000697.Google Scholar
  54. Piaget, J. 1932. The moral judgement of the child. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
  55. Roscoe, R.D., and M.T. Chi. 2007. Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research 77 (4): 534–574.Google Scholar
  56. Schraw, G. 1998. Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science 26 (1–2): 113–125.Google Scholar
  57. Schunk, D.H. 1989. Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review 1 (3): 173–208.Google Scholar
  58. Strauss, S., and M. Ziv. 2012. Teaching is a natural cognitive ability for humans. Mind, Brain, and Education 6 (4): 186–196.Google Scholar
  59. Strauss, S., M. Ziv, and A. Stein. 2002. Teaching as a natural cognition and its relations to preschoolers’ developing theory of mind. Cognitive Development 17 (3): 1473–1487.Google Scholar
  60. Strauss, S., C.I. Calero, and M. Sigman. 2014. Teaching, naturally. Trends in neuroscience and education 3 (2): 38–43.Google Scholar
  61. Tan, S.H., and G. Schafer. 2005. Toddlers’ novel word learning: Effects of phonological representation, vocabulary size and parents’ ostensive behaviour. First Language 25 (2): 131–155.Google Scholar
  62. Tomasello, M., M. Carpenter, J. Call, T. Behne, and H. Moll. 2005. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (05): 675–691.Google Scholar
  63. Topping, K. 2015. Peer tutoring: Old method, new developments/Tutoría entre iguales: método antiguo, nuevos avances. Infancia y Aprendizaje 38 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
  64. Viterbori, P., M.C. Usai, L. Traverso, and V. De Franchis. 2015. How preschool executive functioning predicts several aspects of math achievement in grades 1 and 3: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 140: 38–55.Google Scholar
  65. Wood, D., H. Wood, S. Ainsworth, and C. O’Malley. 1995. On becoming a tutor: Toward an ontogenetic model. Cognition and Instruction 13: 565–581.Google Scholar
  66. Wu, R., and N.Z. Kirkham. 2010. No two cues are alike: Depth of learning during infancy is dependent on what orients attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 107: 118–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.014.Google Scholar
  67. Wu, R., K.S. Tummeltshammer, T. Gliga, and N.Z. Kirkham. 2014. Ostensive signals support learning from novel attention cues during infancy. Frontiers in Psychology 5(251):1–9.Google Scholar
  68. Yoon, J.M.D., M.H. Johnson, and G. Csibra. 2008. Communication-induced memory biases in preverbal infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 13690–13695.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804388105.Google Scholar
  69. Ziv, M., and D. Frye. 2004. Children's understanding of teaching: The role of knowledge and belief. Cognitive Development 19 (4): 457–477.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia I. Calero
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • A. P. Goldin
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. Sigman
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Hospital Universitario sede Saavedra, Unidad de Neurobiología Aplicada (CEMIC-UNA)Buenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Laboratorio de NeurocienciaUniversidad Torcuato Di TellaBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.CONICETBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations