Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–16 | Cite as

Memory: Irreducible, Basic, and Primary Source of Knowledge

Article
First Online:
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

I argue against preservationism, the epistemic claim that memories can at most preserve knowledge generated by other basic types of sources. I show how memories can and do generate knowledge that is irreducible to other basic sources of knowledge. In some epistemic contexts, memories are primary basic sources of knowledge; they can generate knowledge by themselves or with trivial assistance from other types of basic sources of knowledge. I outline an ontology of information transmission from events to memory as an alternative to causal theories of memory. I derive from information theory a concept of reliability of memories as the ratio of retrieved information to transmitted information. I distinguish the generation of knowledge from reliable memories from its generation from unreliable memories. Reliable memories can generate new knowledge by forming together narratives and via colligation. Coherent, even unreliable, memories can generate knowledge if they are epistemically independent of each other and the prior probability of the knowledge they generate is sufficiently low or high. Ascertaining the epistemic independence of memories and eliminating possible confounders may be achieved through the generation of knowledge from independent memories in different minds, when memories are primary basic sources of knowledge and the testimonies that report them are trivial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ambrogi Lorenzini, C.G., E. Baldi, C. Bucherelli, B. Sacchetti, and G. Tassoni. 1999. Neural topography and chronology of memory consolidation: A review of functional inactivation findings. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 71: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ankersmit, F.R. 1983. Narrative logic: A semantic analysis of the Historian’s language. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  3. Ankersmit, F.R. 2008. Narrative and interpretation. In Companion to the Philosophy of history and historiography, ed. Aviezer Tucker, 199–208. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Audi, Robert. 1997. The place of testimony in the fabric of knowledge and justification. American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 405–422.Google Scholar
  5. Audi, Robert. 2002. The sources of knowledge. In The Oxford handbook of epistemology, ed. P. Moser, 71–94. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, Karyn. 2013. Hayden White’s hope, or the politics of prefiguration. In Philosophy of history after Hayden white, ed. Robert Doran, 89–108. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  7. Bernecker, Sven. 2010. Memory: A philosophical study. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bovens, Luc, and Stephan Hartmann. 2003. Bayesian epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carr, David. 1986. Time, narrative and history. Bloomington IN: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dretske, Fred I. 1981. Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dumas, Alexandre. 1864. Le Comte de Monte Cristo. Paris: M. Lévy frères.Google Scholar
  12. Dummett, Michael. 1994. Testimony and Memory. In Knowing from Words: Western And Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony, ed. Bimal Krishna Matilal and Arindam Chakrabarti, 251–272. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gooch, George Peabody. 1959. History and historians in the nineteenth century. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Grundmann, Thomas. 2011. Defeasibility Theory. In The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, ed. Sven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard, 156–166. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Jardine, Nick. 2008. Explanatory genealogies and historical testimony. Episteme 5: 160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kenyon, Tim. 2016. Oral history and the epistemology of testimony. Social Epistemology 30: 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lackey, Jennifer. 2007. Why memory really is a generative epistemic source: A reply to Senor. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lackey, Jennifer. 2008. Learning from words: Testimony as a source of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lackey, Jennifer. 2011. Testimonial Knowledge. In The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, ed. Sven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard, 316–325. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Laplace, Pierre-Simon. 1840. Essai philosophique sur les probabilités, 6 th Eds. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, C.I. 1946. An analysis of knowledge and valuation. La Salle IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  22. McCullagh, C. Behan. 2008. Colligation. In Companion to the Philosophy of history and historiography, ed. Aviezer Tucker, 152–161. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Michaelian, Kourken. 2011. Generative memory. Philosophical Psychology 24: 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michaelian, Kourken. 2016. Mental time travel: Episodic memory and our knowledge of the personal past. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mitchell, K.J., and M.K. Johnson. 2000. Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences. In Oxford handbook of memory, ed. E. Tulving and F.I.M. Craik, 175–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Olsson, Erik J. 2005. Against coherence: Truth, probability, and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olsson, E.J., and T. Shogenji. 2004. Can we trust our memories? C. I. Lewis’s coherence argument. Synthese 142: 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Plantinga, Alvin. 1993. Warrant and proper function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ricoeur, Paul. 1983-1985. Temps et récit, Vols I-III. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  30. Robins, Sarah. 2016. Representing the past: Memory traces and the causal theory of memory. Philosophical Studies 173: 2993–3013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schacter, D.L., and D.R. Addis. 2007. The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 362: 773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Senor, Thomas D. 2007. Preserving Preservationism: A reply to Lackey. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Squire, L.R., and S. Zola-Morgan. 1991. The medial temporal lobe memory system. Science 253: 1380–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Strawson, P.F. 1994. Knowing from Words. In Knowing from Words: Western And Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony, ed. Bimal Krishna Matilal and Arindam Chakrabarti, 23–28. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sutton, John. 1998. Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Tucker, Aviezer. 2004. Our knowledge of the past: A Philosophy of historiography. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tucker, Aviezer. 2016. The generation of knowledge from multiple testimonies. Social Epistemology 30: 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Walsh, W.H. 1960. Philosophy of history: An introduction. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  39. Williamson, Timothy. 2007. On being justified in One's head. In Rationality and the good: Critical essays on the ethics and epistemology of Robert Audi, ed. M. Timmons, J. Greco, and A.R. Mele, 106–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zaragoza, M.S., and K.J. Mitchell. 1996. Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories. Psychological Science 7: 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations