Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 55–70 | Cite as

“Categorical Perception” and Linguistic Categorization of Color

  • Radek Ocelák


This paper offers a conceptual clarification of the phenomenon commonly referred to as categorical perception of color, both in adults and in infants. First, I argue against the common notion of categorical perception as involving a distortion of the perceptual color space. The effects observed in the categorical perception research concern categorical discrimination performance and the underlying processing; they need not directly reflect the relations of color similarity and difference. Moreover, the methodology of the research actually presupposes that the relations of similarity and difference do not vary with languages. The observed categorical perception effects should be conceived independently of the perceptual color space. Second, I challenge the usual opinion that the existing evidence on infant “categorical perception” allows us to conclude that infants perceptually categorize color, and in particular, that they have perceptual categories that resemble the basic color categories of English. Such conclusions rest on an unjustified interpretation of the infant “categorical perception” findings in terms of adult linguistic categorical boundaries. Based on the suggested new understanding, I propose that the phenomenon, as present in infants, should be conceived and examined as a possible explanatory factor with respect to the existing patterns of color naming in languages of the world.


Color Space Stimulus Pair Discrimination Performance Visual Search Task Categorical Perception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This paper draws on chapter 6 of the thesis Ocelák (2013), defended at the University of Amsterdam and supervised by Martin Stokhof. Valuable comments on previous versions were provided by him, by Lieven Decock, and by two anonymous reviewers. Any remaining faults are solely my responsibility. The study gained support from the project GA UK 330214 “Color and Meaning” at Charles University as well as from the Programme for the Development of Fields of Study at Charles University, No. P13 Rationality in human sciences, sub-programme Knowledge and Normativity.


  1. Baronchelli, A., T. Gong, A. Puglisi, and V. Loreto. 2010. Modeling the emergence of universality in color naming patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107: 2403–2407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlin, B., and P. Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution: Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Biggam, C.P., and C.J. Kay (Eds.) 2006. Progress in Colour Studies, Vol. I: Language and Culture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  4. Biggam, C.P., C.A. Hough, C.J. Kay, and D.R. Simmons (Eds.) 2011. New Directions in Colour Studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Bird, Ch.M., S.C. Berens, A.J. Horner, and A. Franklin. 2014. Categorical encoding of color in the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111: 4590–4595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bornstein, M., W. Kessen, and S. Weiskopf. 1976. Color vision and hue categorisation in young human infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2: 115–129.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A.M., D.T. Lindsey, and K.M. Guckes. 2011. Color names, color categories, and color-cued visual search: Sometimes, color perception is not categorical. Journal of Vision, 11: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clifford, A., A. Franklin, I.R.L. Davies, and A. Holmes. 2009. Electrophysiological markers of categorical perception of color in 7-month old infants. Brain and Cognition, 71: 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clifford, A., A. Franklin, A. Holmes, and I.R.L. Davies. 2011. Investigating the underlying mechanisms of categorical perception of colour using the event-related potential technique. In New Directions in Colour Studies, eds. Biggam C.P., Hough C.A., Kay C.J., and Simmons D.R., 237–249. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  10. Clifford, A., A. Franklin, A. Holmes, V.G. Drivonikou, E. Özgen, and I.R.L. Davies. 2012. Neural correlates of acquired category effects. Brain and Cognition, 80: 126–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidoff, J., and J. Fagot. 2010. Cross-species assessment of the linguistic origins of color categories. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 5: 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidoff, J., J. Goldstein, and D. Roberson. 2009. Nature vs. nurture: the simple contrast. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102: 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidoff, J., J. Goldstein, I. Tharp, E. Wakui, and J. Fagot. 2012. Perceptual and categorical judgments of colour similarity. Journal of cognitive psychology: 1–22.Google Scholar
  14. Dedrick, D. 1998. Naming the Rainbow: Colour Language, Colour Science, and Culture: Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Drivonikou, G., A. Clifford, A. Franklin, and E. Özgen. 2011. Category training affects colour discrimination but only in the right visual field. In New Directions in Colour Studies, eds. Biggam C.P., Hough C.A., Kay C.J., and Simmons D.R., 251–264. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  16. Fairchild, M.D. 2005. Color Appearance Models.: The Wiley-IS&T Series in Imaging Science and Technology. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Franklin, A., and I.R.L. Davies. 2004. New evidence for infant colour categories. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22: 349–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franklin, A., and I.R.L. Davies. 2006. Converging evidence for pre-linguistic colour categorization. In Progress in Colour Studies, Vol. II: Psychological Aspects, eds. Pitchford N.J. and Biggam C.P., 101–119. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  19. Franklin, A., A. Clifford, E. Williamson, and I.R.L. Davies. 2005a. Color term knowledge does not affect categorical perception of color in toddlers. Journal of Experimental, Child, Psychology, 90: 114–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franklin, A., M. Pilling, and I.R.L. Davies. 2005b. The nature of infant colour categorisation: Evidence from eye-movements on a target detection task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 22: 349–377.Google Scholar
  21. Franklin, A., G.V. Drivonikou, L. Bevis, I.R.L. Davies, P. Kay, and T. Regier. 2008a. Categorical perception of color is lateralized to the right hemisphere in infants, but to the left hemisphere in adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105: 3221–3225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franklin, A., G.V. Drivonikou, A. Clifford, P. Kay, T. Regier, and I.R.L. Davies. 2008b. Lateralization of categorical perception of color changes with color term acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105: 18221–18225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franklin, A., N. Pitchford, L. Hart, I.R.L. Davies, S. Clausse, and S. Jennings. 2008c. Salience of primary and secondary colours in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 26: 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franklin, A., O. Wright, and I.R.L. Davies. 2009. What can we learn from toddlers about categorical perception of color? Comments on Goldstein, Davidoff and Roberson. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102: 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanley, J.R., and D. Roberson. 2011. Categorical perception effects reflect differences in typicality on within-category trials. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 18: 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harnad, S. 1987. Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: A critical overview. In Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition, ed. Harnad S., 535–565. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jäger, G., and R. van Rooij. 2007. Language structure: psychological and social constraints. Synthese, 159: 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jameson, K.J., and N.L. Komarova. 2009a. Evolutionary models of color categorization. I. Population categorization systems based on normal and dichromat observers. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 26: 1414–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jameson, K.J., and N.L. Komarova. 2009b. Evolutionary models of color categorization. II. Realistic observer models and population heterogeneity. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 26: 1424–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jraissati, Y. 2012. Categorical perception of color: assessing the role of language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 12: 439–462.Google Scholar
  31. Kay, P. 2005. Color categories are not arbitrary. Cross-Cultural Research, 39: 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kay, P., and W. Kempton. 1984. What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86: 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kay, P., and L. Maffi. 1999. Color appearance and the emergence and evolution of basic color lexicons. American Anthropologist 101: 743–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kay, P., and T. Regier. 2003. Resolving the question of color naming universals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 9085–9089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kay, P., B. Berlin, L. Maffi, W.R. Merrifield, and R. Cook. 2009. The World Color Survey. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
  36. Kuehni, R.G. 2002. CIEDE2000: Milestone, or final answer? Color Research and Application, 27: 126–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loreto, V., A. Mukherjee, and F. Tria. 2012. On the origin of the hierarchy of color names. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109: 6819–6824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lucy, J.A. 1997. The linguistics of “color”. In Color Categories in Thought and Language, eds. Hardin C.L. and Maffi L., 320–346. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. MacLaury, R.E., G.V. Paramei, and D. Dedrick (Eds.) 2007. Anthropology of Colour: Interdisciplinary Multilevel Modeling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  40. Ocelák, R. The myth of unique hues. To appear in Topoi. doi: 10.1007/s11245-014-9249-4.
  41. Ocelák, R. 2013. Carving up the rainbow: how to model linguistic categorization of color. University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Master of Logic (MoL) Thesis Series, ILLC.Google Scholar
  42. Özgen, E., and I.R.L. Davies. 2002. Acquisition of categorical colour perception: A perceptual learning approach to the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131: 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ozturk, O., S. Shayan, U. Liszkowski, and A. Majid. 2013. Language is not necessary for color categories. Developmental Science, 16: 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pilling, M., and I.R.L. Davies. 2004. Linguistic relativism and colour cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 95: 429–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Regier, T., P. Kay, and N. Khetarpal. 2007. Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104: 1436–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberson, D., J. Davidoff, and N. Braisby. 1999. Similarity and categorisation: neuropsychological evidence for a dissociation in explicit categorisation tasks. Cognition, 71: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roberson, D., I. Davies, and J. Davidoff. 2000. Color categories are not universal: Replications and evidence form a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126: 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roberson, D., J. Davidoff, I.R. Davies, and L.R. Shapiro. 2005. Color categories: evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive psychology 50: 378–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roberson, D., J.R. Hanley, and H. Pak. 2009. Thresholds for color discrimination in english and korean speakers. Cognition 112: 482–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saunders, B. 2000. Revisiting Basic color terms. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saunders, B., and J. van Brakel. 1997. Are there nontrivial constraints on colour categorization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 167–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steels, L., and T. Belpaeme. 2005. Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28: 469–529.Google Scholar
  53. Winawer, J., N. Witthoft, M.C. Frank, L. Wu, A.R. Wade, and L. Boroditsky. 2007. Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104: 7780–7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Witzel, C., and K.R. Gegenfurtner. 2013. Categorical sensitivity to color differences. Journal of Vision, 13: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy and Religious StudiesCharles University in Prague (Faculty of Arts)Praha 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations