Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 375–389 | Cite as

Artifact and Artifact Categorization: Comparing Humans and Capuchin Monkeys

  • Stefano Borgo
  • Noemi Spagnoletti
  • Laure Vieu
  • Elisabetta Visalberghi
Article

Abstract

We aim to show that far-related primates like humans and the capuchin monkeys show interesting correspondences in terms of artifact characterization and categorization. We investigate this issue by using a philosophically-inspired definition of physical artifact which, developed for human artifacts, turns out to be applicable for cross-species comparison. In this approach an artifact is created when an entity is intentionally selected and some capacities attributed to it (often characterizing a purpose). Behavioral studies suggest that this notion of artifact is not specific to the human kind. On the basis of the results of a series of field observations and experiments on wild capuchin monkeys that routinely use stone hammers and anvils, we show that the notions of intentional selection and attributed capacity appear to be at play in capuchins as well. The study also suggests that functional criteria and contextualization play a fundamental role in terms of artifact recognition and categorization in nonhuman primates.

References

  1. Baker, L.R. 2004. The ontology of artifacts. Philosophical Explorations 7(2): 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boesch, C., J. Head, and M. Robbins. 2009. Complex tool sets for honey extraction among chimpanzees in Loango National Park, Gabon. Journal of Human Evolution 56: 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borgo, S. and Vieu, L. 2009. Artefacts in formal ontology. In Anthonie Meijers, editor, Handbook of philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, Elsevier, 273–308.Google Scholar
  4. Borgo, S., Franssen, M., Garbacz, P., Kitamura, Y., Mizoguchi, R. and Vermaas, P. 2011. Technical artifact: An integrated perspective. In Vermaas, P. and Dignum, V. eds, Formal Ontologies Meet Industry - Proceedings of FOMI 2011, IOS Press, 3–15.Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, R. 1975. Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dipert, R. 1993. Artifacts, art works, and agency. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Falótico, T. 2011. Uso de ferramentas por macacos-prego (Sapajus libidinosus) do Parque Nacional Serra da Capivara – PI. Tese de Doutorado em Psicologia Experimental. Instituto de Psicologia. Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo-SP. 172 p.Google Scholar
  8. Ferreira, R., L. Jerusalinsky, T. Silva, M. Fialho, A. Fernandes, A. Roque, and M.F. Arruda. 2009. On the occurrence of Cebus flavius (Schreber 1774) in the Caatinga, and the use of semiarid environments by Cebus species in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Norte. Primates 50: 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fragaszy, D. 2011. Community resources for learning: how capuchin monkeys construct technical traditions. Biological Theory 6: 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fragaszy, D., E. Visalberghi, and L. Fedigan. 2004. The complete capuchin: The biology of the genus Cebus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gumert, M., M. Kluck, and M. Malaivijitnond. 2009. The physical characteristics and usage patterns of stone axe and pounding hammers used by long-tailed macaques in the Andaman Sea region of Thailand. American Journal of Primatology 71: 594–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hilpinen, R. 2011. Artifact. In Edward N. Zalta (ed), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/artifact/>.
  13. Houkes, W. and Vermaas, P. 2010. Technical functions. On the use and design of artefacts. Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Kennedy, E.H., and D. Fragaszy. 2008. Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology 122: 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu, Q., D. Fragaszy, B. Wright, K. Wright, P. Izar, and E. Visalberghi. 2011. Wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) place nuts in anvils selectively. Animal Behaviour 81(1): 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lowe, E.J. 1983. On the identity of artifacts. The Journal of Philosophy 80(4): 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mannu, M., and E.B. Ottoni. 2009. The enhanced tool-kit of two groups of wild bearded capuchin monkeys in the Caatinga: tool making, associative use, and secondary tools. American Journal of Primatology 71: 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds) 2007. Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N. and Oltramari, A. 2003. Wonderweb deliverable 18. Technical report. CNR, 2003.Google Scholar
  20. Masolo, C., L. Vieu, E. Bottazzi, C. Catenacci, R. Ferrario, A. Gangemi, and N. Guarino. 2004. Social roles and their descriptions. In Proceedings of the 9th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004), ed. D. Dubois and C. Welty, 267–277. Menlo Park: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  21. Matsuzawa, T. 2001. Primate foundations of human intelligence: A view of tool use in nonhuman primates and fossil hominids. Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Oswalt, W.H. 1973. Habitat and technology: The evolution of hunting. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Potts, R. 1991. Why the Oldowan? Plio-Pleistocene tool making and the transport of resources. Journal of Anthropological Research 47: 153–176.Google Scholar
  24. Shumaker, R., K. Walkup, and B. Beck. 2011. Animal tool behavior: The use and manufacture of tools by animals. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Spagnoletti, N., E. Visalberghi, E. Ottoni, P. Izar, and D. Fragaszy. 2011. Stone tool use by adult wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus). Journal of Human Evolution 61: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spinozzi, G., G. Lubrano, and V. Truppa. 2004. Categorization of above and below spatial relations by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology 118(4): 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomasson, A. 2007. Artifacts and human concepts. In Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation, ed. E. Margolis and S. Laurence, 52–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tomasello, M., and J. Call. 1997. Primate cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Truppa, V., E. Piano Mortari, D. Garofoli, S. Privitera, and E. Visalberghi. 2001. Same/different concept learning by capuchin monkeys in matching-to-sample tasks. PLoS One 6(8): e23809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vieu, L., S. Borgo, and C. Masolo. 2008. Artefacts and roles: Modeling strategies in a multiplicative ontology. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2008), ed. C. Eschenbach and M. Gruninger, 121–134. Amsterdam: Ios Press.Google Scholar
  31. Visalberghi, E., D. Fragaszy, E. Ottoni, P. Izar, M. Gomes de Oliveira, and F. Andrade. 2007. Characteristics of hammer stones and anvils used by wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) to crack open palm nuts. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 132: 426–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Visalberghi, E., E. Addessi, N. Spagnoletti, V. Truppa, E. Ottoni, P. Izar, and D. Fragaszy. 2009. Selection of effective stone tools by wild capuchin monkeys. Current Biology 19: 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Visalberghi E., Haslam M., Spagnoletti N., Fragaszy D. (2013) Use of stone hammer tools and anvils by bearded capuchin monkeys over time and space: dynamic construction of an archeological record of tool use. Journal of Archeological Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.021.
  34. Westergaard, G.C., and S.J. Suomi. 1994. A simple stone-tool technology in monkeys. Journal of Human Evolution 27: 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Borgo
    • 1
  • Noemi Spagnoletti
    • 2
    • 3
  • Laure Vieu
    • 1
    • 4
  • Elisabetta Visalberghi
    • 3
  1. 1.LOA-ISTC-CNRTrentoItaly
  2. 2.PSE-IP-University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.UCP-ISTC-CNRRomeItaly
  4. 4.IRIT-CNRSToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations