The Role of Victims’ Emotions in Preschoolers’ Moral Judgments
- 385 Downloads
Do victims’ emotions underlie preschoolers’ moral judgment abilities? Study 1 asked preschoolers (n = 72) to judge actions directed at characters who could and could not feel hurt and who did and did not cry. These judgments took into account only the nature of the action, not the nature of the victim. To further investigate how victims’ emotions might impact children’s moral judgments, Study 2 presented preschoolers (n = 37) with stories that varied in transgression type (Moral, Conventional, or None) and victim’s reaction (Crying Present or Crying Absent). As in Study 1, children’s judgments were affected primarily by transgression type, and not by emotion. In an analogous task, judgments of children with autism spectrum disorders (Study 3; n = 12) were affected by both transgression type and crying. Typically developing children’s moral judgments are thus concerned primarily with action type, not with emotional displays, but the judgments of children with autism spectrum disorders can be swayed by victims’ emotions.
We would like to thank all of the child participants and their parents and teachers for their cooperation in this research. Thanks also to the members of the Cognition and Development Lab, especially Melissa Kibbe, Katya Saunders, and Lu Wang, for their assistance in developing stimuli and testing subjects. This research was supported by NSF grants BCS-0725169 and BCS-0922184.
- Arsenio, W., and A. Lover. 1995. Children’s conceptions of sociomoral affect: Happy victimizers, mixed emotions, and other expectancies. In Morality in everyday life: Developmental perspectives, ed. M. Killen and D. Hart, 87–128. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Dunn, L.M., and L.M. Dunn. 1997. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT III). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Kagan, J. 1984. The nature of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. 1969. Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Handbook of socialization theory and research, ed. D.A. Goslin, 347–480. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L., C. Levine, and A. Hewer. 1983. Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.Google Scholar
- Nichols, S. 2004. Sentimental rules: on the natural foundations of moral judgment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Turiel, E. 1983. The development of social knowledge: morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Turiel, E., and M. Killen. 2010. Taking emotions seriously: The role of emotions in moral development. In Emotions, aggression, and morality in children: Bridging development and psychopathology, ed. W.F. Arsenio and E.A. Lemerise, 33–52. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Young, L., J.A. Camprodon, M. Hauser, A. Pascual-Leone, and R. Saxe. 2010. Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(15): 6753–6758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar