Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 109–123 | Cite as

Embodying Bodies and Worlds

  • Matteo Candidi
  • Salvatore Maria Aglioti
  • Patrick Haggard
Article

Abstract

Sensorimotor representations are essential for building up and maintaining corporeal awareness, i.e. the ability to perceive, know and evaluate one's own body as well as the bodies of others. The notion of embodied cognition implies that abstract forms of conceptual knowledge may be ultimately instantiated in such sensorimotor representations. In this sense, conceptual thinking should evoke, via mental simulation, some underlying sensorimotor events. In this review we discuss studies on the relation between embodiment and corporeal awareness. We approach the question by issuing challenges from both ends. First, we ask whether bodily representations themselves can be disembodied or disconnected from underlying sensorimotor events. Second, we ask whether any concept, no matter how abstract, can actually be embodied in this way. The strong view of embodied cognition requires a negative answer to the first question, and an affirmative answer to the second. We also focus on the surprising range of cognitive processes that can be explained by linking them to corporeal awareness, such as aesthetic appreciation, and object constancy following brain damage. We conclude that (a) somatomotor simulation may help to understand the external world and the society of other individuals, but (b) some non-somatic forms of simulation may be required to explain how abstract knowledge contributes to understanding others' states. In this sense, the classic divide between sensorimotor and conceptual domains must remain in some form.

References

  1. Aglioti, S.M., and M. Pazzaglia. 2010. Representing actions through their sound. Experimental Brain Research 206(2): 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aglioti, S.M., and M. Pazzaglia. 2011. Sounds and scents in (social) action. Trends in Cognitive Science 15(2): 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aglioti, S., N. Smania, M. Manfredi, and G. Berlucchi. 1996. Disownership of left hand and objects related to it in a patient with right brain damage. Neuroreport 8(1): 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arzy, S., M. Seeck, S. Ortigue, L. Spinelli, and O. Blanke. 2006. Induction of an illusory shadow person. Nature 443(7109): 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Astafiev, S.V., C.M. Stanley, G.L. Shulman, and M. Corbetta. 2004. Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions. Nature Neuroscience 7: 542–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bach, P., and S.P. Tipper. 2006. Bend it like Beckham: embodying the motor skills of famous athletes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove) 59(12): 2033–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barsalou, L.W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4): 577–609. discussion 610–60.Google Scholar
  8. Barsalou, L.W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berlucchi, G., and S. Aglioti. 1997. The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends in Neurosciences 20(12): 560–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berlucchi, G., and S.M. Aglioti. 2010. The body in the brain revisited. Experimental Brain Research 200(1): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blanke, O., and T. Metzinger. 2009. Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Science 13(1): 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blanke, O., S. Ortigue, T. Landis, and M. Seeck. 2002. Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature 419(6904): 269–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blanke, O., T. Landis, L. Spinelli, and M. Seeck. 2004. Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin. Brain 127(Pt 2): 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blanke, O., C. Mohr, C.M. Michel, A. Pascual-Leone, P. Brugger, M. Seeck, T. Landis, and G. Thut. 2005. Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction. Journal of Neuroscience 25(3): 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brang, D., P.D. McGeoch, and V.S. Ramachandran. 2008. Apotemnophilia: a neurological disorder. Neuroreport 19(13): 1305–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brugger, P., S.S. Kollias, R.M. Müri, G. Crelier, M.C. Hepp-Reymond, and M. Regard. 2000. Beyond re-membering: phantom sensations of congenitally absent limbs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97(11): 6167–6172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buccino, G., L. Riggio, G. Melli, F. Binkofski, V. Gallese, and G. Rizzolatti. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 24: 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cahn, B.R., and J. Polich. 2006. Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin 132(2): 180–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Candidi, M., C. Urgesi, S. Ionta, and S.M. Aglioti. 2008. Virtual lesion of ventral premotor cortex impairs visual perception of biomechanically possible but not impossible actions. Social Neuroscience 3: 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Candidi, M., B. Leone-Fernandez, H.A. Barber, M. Carreiras, and S.M. Aglioti. 2010a. Hands on the future: facilitation of cortico-spinal hand-representation when reading the future tense of hand-related action verbs. European Journal of Neuroscience 32(4): 677–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Candidi, M., C.M. Vicario, A.M. Abreu, and S.M. Aglioti. 2010b. Competing mechanisms for mapping action-related categorical knowledge and observed actions. Cerebral Cortex 20(12): 2832–2841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Catmur, C., V. Walsh, and C. Heyes. 2007. Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology 17(17): 1527–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chan, A.W., M.V. Peelen, and P.E. Downing. 2004. The effect of viewpoint on body representation in the extrastriate body area. Neuroreport 15(15): 2407–2410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clark, A., and R. Grush. 1999. Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior 7(1): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Costantini, M., C. Urgesi, G. Galati, G.L. Romani, and S.M. Aglioti. 2011. Haptic perception and body representation in lateral and medial occipito temporal cortices. Neuropsychologia 49(5): 821–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Curt, A., C.N. Yengue, L.M. Hilti, and P. Brugger. 2011. Supernumerary phantom limbs in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 49(5): 588–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. D’Ausilio, A., F. Pulvermuller, P. Salmas, I. Bufalari, C. Begliomini, and L. Fadiga. 2009. The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology 19: 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Danziger, N., I. Faillenot, and R. Peyron. 2009. Can we share a pain we never felt? Neural correlates of empathy in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain. Neuron 61(2): 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. di Pellegrino, G., L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, V. Gallese, and G. Rizzolatti. 1992. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 91: 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Downing, P.E., Y. Jiang, M. Shuman, and N. Kanwisher. 2001. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293: 2470–2473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Drysdale, D.G., K. Shem, A. Walbom, M.D. Miner, and M. Maclachlan. 2009. Phantom sensations in people with complete spinal cord lesions: a grounded theory perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation 31(4): 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ehrsson, H.H. 2009. How many arms make a pair? Perceptual illusion of having an additional limb. Perception 38(2): 310–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fadiga, L., L. Fogassi, G. Pavesi, and G. Rizzolatti. 1995. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology 73: 2608–2611.Google Scholar
  34. Fogassi, L., P.F. Ferrari, B. Gesierich, S. Rozzi, F. Chersi, and G. Rizzolatti. 2005. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308(5722): 662–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Freedberg, D., and V. Gallese. 2007. Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Science 11(5): 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gallese V. 2003. The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 358:517–28.Google Scholar
  37. Gallese, V., and C. Sinigaglia. 2011. What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Science 15(11): 512–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Giszter, S.F., J. McIntyre, and E. Bizzi. 1989. Kinematic strategies and sensorimotor transformations in the wiping movements of frogs. Journal of Neurophysiology 62(3): 750–767.Google Scholar
  39. Giummarra, M.J., J.L. Bradshaw, M.E. Nicholls, L.M. Hilti, and P. Brugger. 2011. Body integrity identity disorder: deranged body processing, right fronto-parietal dysfunction, and phenomenological experience of body incongruity. Neuropsychology Review 21(4): 320–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gold, J.I., and M.N. Shadlen. 2003. The influence of behavioral context on the representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. Journal of Neuroscience 23(2): 632–651.Google Scholar
  41. Goldman, A.I. 2006. Simulating minds. The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Goldman, A.I., and F. de Vignemont. 2009. Is social cognition embodied? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(4): 154–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grush, R. 2004. The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(3): 377–396.Google Scholar
  44. Halligan, P.W., and J.C. Marshall. 1995. Supernumerary phantom limb after right hemispheric stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 59(3): 341–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hilti, L.M., and P. Brugger. 2010. Incarnation and animation: physical versus representational deficits of body integrity. Experimental Brain Research 204(3): 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hodzic, A., A. Kaas, L. Muckli, A. Stirn, and W. Singer. 2009. Distinct cortical networks for the detection and identification of human body. NeuroImage 45: 1264–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ionta, S., L. Heydrich, B. Lenggenhager, M. Mouthon, E. Fornari, D. Chapuis, R. Gassert, and O. Blanke. 2011. Multisensory mechanisms in temporo-parietal cortex support self-location and first-person perspective. Neuron 70(2): 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Iriki, A., M. Tanaka, and Y. Iwamura. 1996. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7: 2325–2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kawato, M., and D. Wolpert. 1998. Internal models for motor control. Novartis Foundation Symposium 218: 291–304.Google Scholar
  50. Kennett, S., M. Taylor-Clarke, and P. Haggard. 2001. Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biology 11: 1188–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kitada, R., I.S. Johnsrude, T. Kochiyama, and S.J. Lederman. 2009. Functional specialization and convergence in the occipito-temporal cortex supporting haptic and visual identification of human faces and body parts: an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21(10): 2027–2045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Longo, M.R., V. Betti, S.M. Aglioti, and P. Haggard. 2009. Visually induced analgesia: seeing the body reduces pain. Journal of Neuroscience 29(39): 12125–12130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lutz, A., H.A. Slagter, J.D. Dunne, and R.J. Davidson. 2008. Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Science 12: 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Magherini, G. 2003. La sindrome di Stendhal. Il malessere del viaggiatore di fronteallagrandezzadell'arte" - Ponte alle GrazieGoogle Scholar
  55. Mahon, B.Z., and A. Caramazza. 2008. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology, Paris 102: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGeoch, P.D., D. Brang, T. Song, R.R. Lee, M. Huang, and V.S. Ramachandran. 2011. Xenomelia: a new right parietal lobe syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 82(12): 1314–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Melzack, R. 1990. Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix. Trends in Neurosciences 13: 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Melzack, R., R. Israel, R. Lacroix, and G. Schultz. 1997. Phantom limbs in people with congenital limb deficiency or amputation in early childhood. Brain 120: 1603–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mercier, C., K.T. Reilly, C.D. Vargas, A. Aballea, and A. Sirigu. 2006. Mapping phantom movement representations in the motor cortex of amputees. Brain 129(Pt 8): 2202–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moro, V., C. Urgesi, S. Pernigo, P. Lanteri, M. Pazzaglia, and S.M. Aglioti. 2008. The neural basis of body form and body action agnosia. Neuron 60: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morris, J.P., K.A. Pelphrey, and G. McCarthy. 2006. Occipito-temporal activation evoked by the perception of human bodies is modulated by the presence or absence of the face. Neuropsychologia 44: 1919–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moseley, G.L., and P. Brugger. 2009. Interdependence of movement and anatomy persists when amputees learn a physiologically impossible movement of their phantom limb. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(44): 18798–18802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mukamel, R., A.D. Ekstrom, J. Kaplan, M. Iacoboni, and I. Fried. 2010. Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology 20(8): 750–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Newberg, A.B., and J. Iversen. 2003. The neural basis of the complex mental task of meditation: neurotransmitter and neurochemical considerations. Medical Hypotheses 61: 282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pazzaglia, M., L. Pizzamiglio, E. Pes, and S.M. Aglioti. 2008. The sound of actions in apraxia. Current Biology 18(22): 1766–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peelen, M.V., and P.E. Downing. 2005. Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neurophysiology 93: 603–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Peelen, M.V., A.J. Wiggett, and P.E. Downing. 2006. Patterns of fMRI activity dissociate overlapping functional brain areas that respond to biological motion. Neuron 49: 815–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pezzulo, G., and C. Castelfranchi. 2007. The symbol detachment problem. Cognitive Processing 8(2): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pulvermuller, F. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Putnam, H. 1975. The nature of mental states. In Mind, language, and reality: Philosophical papers, Vol. 2, ed. H. Putnam, 429–440. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saxe, R., N. Jamal, and L. Powell. 2006. My body or yours? The effect of visual perspective on cortical body representations. Cerebral Cortex 16: 178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Serino, A., M. Bassolino, A. Farnè, and E. Làdavas. 2007. Extended multisensory space in blind cane users. Psychological Science 18(7): 642–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stendhal. 1812. Rome, Naples et Florence, 1987. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  74. Taylor-Clarke, M., S. Kennett, and P. Haggard. 2002. Vision modulates somatosensory cortical processing. Current Biology 12: 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tsakiris, M., M. Costantini, and P. Haggard. 2008. The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body. Neuropsychologia 46(12): 3014–3018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Urgesi C, Aglioti SM, Skrap M, Fabbro F. 2010. The spiritual brain: selective cortical lesions modulate human self-transcendence. Neuron. 65(3):309–19.Google Scholar
  77. Urgesi, C., M. Candidi, S. Ionta, and S.M. Aglioti. 2007a. Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex. Nature Neuroscience 10: 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Urgesi, C., B. Calvo-Merino, P. Haggard, and S.M. Aglioti. 2007b. Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals two cortical pathways for visual body processing. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 8023–8030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vargas, C.D., A. Aballéa, E.C. Rodrigues, K.T. Reilly, C. Mercier, P. Petruzzo, J.M. Dubernard, and A. Sirigu. 2009. Re-emergence of hand-muscle representations in human motor cortex after hand allograft. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(17): 7197–7202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matteo Candidi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Salvatore Maria Aglioti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Patrick Haggard
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLa SapienzaRomeItaly
  2. 2.IRCCS, Santa LuciaRomeItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Cognitive NeuroscienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations