Advertisement

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 105–122 | Cite as

What Are Auditory Objects?

  • Matthew NuddsEmail author
Article

Abstract

Our auditory experience involves the experience of auditory objects—sequences of distinct sounds, or parts of continuous sounds—that are experienced as grouped together into a single sound or “stream” of sounds. In this paper I argue that it is not possible to explain what it is to experience an auditory object as such—i.e. to experience a sequence of sounds as grouped—in purely auditory terms; rather, to experience an auditory object as such is to experience a sequence of sounds as having been (apparently) produced by the same source.

Keywords

Frequency Component Sound Source Auditory System Single Object Visual Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowlegdments

I would like to thank to Roberto Casati and an anonymous referee for comments. Research for this paper was supported by an AHRC research leave award.

References

  1. Bey, C., and S. McAdams. 2002. Schema-based processing in auditory scene analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 64(5): 844–854.Google Scholar
  2. Bregman, A.S. 1990. Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  3. Bregman, A.S., and J. Campbell. 1971. Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 244–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carello, C., J.B. Wagman, and M.T. Turvey. 2005. Acoustic specification of object properties. In Moving image theory: Ecological Considerations, ed. J.D. Anderson, and B. Fisher. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Deutsch, D. 1999. Grouping mechanisms in music. In The psychology of music, ed. D. Deutsch. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Freed, D.J. 1990. Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive events. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87: 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaver, W.W. 1993. How do we hear in the world? Explorations in ecological acoustics. Ecological Psychology 5: 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kunkler-Peck, A., and M.T. Turvey. 2000. Hearing shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1: 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McAdams, S. 1993. Recognition of sound sources and events. In Thinking in sound, ed. S. McAdams, and E. Bigand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Michotte, A. 1963. The Perception of Causality (trans: Heath, P.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Neuhoff, J. 2004. Auditory motion and localisation. In Ecological acoustics, ed. J. Neuhoff. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Peacocke, C. 1993. Intuitive mechanics, psychological reality and the idea of a material object. In Spatial representation: Problems in philosophy and psychology, ed. N. Eilan, R.A. McCarthy, and B. Brewer. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Peretz, I. 1993. Auditory agnosia: A functional analysis. In Thinking in sound, ed. S. McAdams, and E. Bigand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Russell, M., and M.T. Turvey. 1999. Auditory perception of unimpeded passage. Ecological Psychology 11: 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schiff, W., and R. Oldak. 1990. Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16: 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scruton, R. 1997. The aesthetics of music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. VenDerveer, N.J. 1979. Ecological acoustics: Human perception of environmental sounds, PhD thesis, 1979. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 4543B. (University Microfilms No. 80-04-002).Google Scholar
  18. Warren, R.M. 1999. Auditory perception: A new analysis and synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Warren, W.H., and R.R. Verbrugge. 1984. Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: A case study in ecological acoustics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10: 704–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wildes, R., and W. Richards. 1988. Recovering material properties from sound. In Natural computation, ed. W. Richards. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language SciencesThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations