Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 123–140 | Cite as

Perceiving the Locations of Sounds

Article

Abstract

Frequently, we learn of the locations of things and events in our environment by means of hearing. Hearing, I argue, is a locational mode of perceiving with a robustly spatial phenomenology. I defend three proposals. First, audition furnishes one with information about the locations of things and happenings in one’s environment because auditory experience itself has spatial content—auditory experience involves awareness of space. Second, we hear the locations of things and events by or in hearing the locations of their sounds. Third, we auditorily experience sounds themselves as having relatively stable distal locations. I reject skepticism about spatial audition and auditory experience tracing to Strawson’s Individuals, and suggest that spatial auditory experience grounds a form of perceptual access to objects and events that is critical to negotiating one’s environment.

Keywords

Sound Source Ordinary Object Auditory Experience Spatial Concept Auditory Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Barbara Shinn-Cunningham for several enjoyable conversations about spatial audition and the auditory experience of space. I would also like to thank two anonymous referees for extensive and extremely useful comments.

References

  1. Blauert, J. 1997. Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Block, N. 1995. On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18: 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyer, J.L., S. Harrison, and T. Ro. 2005. Unconscious processing of orientation and color without primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 102(46): 1675–1679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bregman, A.S. 1990. Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  5. Casati, R., and J. Dokic. 2005. Sounds. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sounds/
  6. Clark, A. 1996. Three varieties of visual field. Philosophical Psychology 9(4): 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, A. 2000. A theory of sentience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, G. 1982. The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gelfand, S.A. 1998. Hearing: An introduction to psychological and physiological acoustics, 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  10. Hartmann, W.A., and A. Wittenberg. 1996. On the externalization of sound images. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99(6): 3678–3688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kershaw, S. 2002. Feeling that witnesses need a hand, police offer one. The New York Times, October 16, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. Kubovy, M., and D. Van Valkenburg. 2001. Auditory and visual objects. Cognition 80: 97–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin, M.G.F. 1992. Sight and touch. In The contents of experience, ed. T. Crane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Matthen, M. 2004. Features, places, and things: reflections on Austen Clark’s theory of sentience. Philosophical Psychology 17(4): 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mills, A.W. 1972. Auditory localization. In Foundations of modern auditory theory, vol. II, ed. J.V. Tobias, 303–348. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Noë, A. 2004. Action in perception. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  17. Nudds, M. 2001. Experiencing the production of sounds. European Journal of Philosophy 9: 210–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Callaghan, C. 2007. Sounds: A philosophical theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. O’Callaghan, C. 2008a. Seeing what you hear: Cross-modal illusions and perception. Philosophical Issues 18(1): 316–338.Google Scholar
  20. O’Callaghan, C. 2008b. Object perception: Vision and Audition. Philosophy Compass 3(4): 803–829.Google Scholar
  21. O’Callaghan, C. 2009. Constructing a theory of sounds. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 5: 247–270.Google Scholar
  22. O’Shaughnessy, B. 2000. Consciousness and the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pasnau, R. 1999. What is sound? Philosophical Quarterly 49: 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shinn-Cunningham, B. 2001a. Creating three dimensions in virtual auditory displays. In Usability evaluation and interface design: Cognitive engineering, intelligent agents and virtual reality, ed. M.J. Smith, G. Salvendy, D. Harris, and R.J. Koubek, 604–608. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Shinn-Cunningham, B. 2001b. Localizing sound in rooms. In Acoustic rendering for virtual environments, 17–22. ACM SIGGRAPH.Google Scholar
  26. Shinn-Cunningham, B. 2003. Acoustics and perception of sound in everyday environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Spatial Media, 1–9.Google Scholar
  27. Strawson, P.F. 1959. Individuals. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weiskrantz, L. 1986. Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Zahorik, P., and F. Wightman. 2001. Loudness constancy with varying sound source distance. Nature Neuroscience 4: 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations