Advertisement

AMS Review

pp 1–21 | Cite as

Frontline knowledge networks in open collaboration models for service innovations

  • Ozlem OzkokEmail author
  • Simon J. Bell
  • Jagdip Singh
  • Kwanghui Lim
Theory/Conceptual
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Service organizations often view customer-facing or frontline employees (FLEs) as sources of inimitable knowledge valuable for innovation. This is due to the experiential nature of service and subtle qualities of engaging customer interactions. Yet, organizations face significant challenges while leveraging the knowledge of their FLEs to develop service innovations. Drawing upon the open innovation and social network literatures, we theorize the role of FLE networks, and the degree to which these networks enable the flow of distinct content for realizing effective service innovation. Specifically, we conceptualize a taxonomy of network domains—connecting customer- and internal-facing employees, and resource flows—new knowledge and self-governance activities, to provide a framework for FLE roles in knowledge networks for service-innovation. Our taxonomy expands opportunities for theorizing the mechanisms of frontline knowledge networks in service innovation as well as identifying a “dark side” that undermines potential innovation gains if left unchecked. Future directions and implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Services marketing Frontline knowledge Open innovation Social network Service employee 

Notes

Funding

This work is supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.

References

  1. Adler, P., Heckscher, C., & Prusak, L. (2011). Building a collaborative enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 89(7–8), 94–101.Google Scholar
  2. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.Google Scholar
  3. Alam, I. (2002). An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 250–261.Google Scholar
  4. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.Google Scholar
  5. Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Balkundi, P., Barsness, Z., & Michael, J. H. (2009). Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability. Small Group Research, 40(3), 301–322.Google Scholar
  7. Ballantyne, D. (2000). Internal relationship marketing: A strategy for knowledge renewal. Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(6), 274–286.Google Scholar
  8. Ballantyne, D. (2003). A relationship mediated theory of internal marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 37(9), 1242–1260.Google Scholar
  9. Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: The exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.Google Scholar
  10. Bell, M. (1981). A matrix approach to the classification of marketing: goods and services. In J. H. Donnelly & W. R. George (Eds.), Marketing of Services (pp. 208–212). Chicago: American Marketing.Google Scholar
  11. Bell, S. J., & Menguc, B. (2002). The employee-organization relationship, organizational citizenship behaviors, and superior service quality. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 131–146.Google Scholar
  12. Bell, S. J., Mengüç, B., & Widing, R. E. (2010). Salesperson learning, organizational learning, and retail store performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 187–201.Google Scholar
  13. Bogers, M., Foss, N. J., & Lyngsie, J. (2018). The “human side” of open innovation: The role of employee diversity in firm-level openness. Research Policy, 47(1), 218–231. Google Scholar
  14. Bolander, W., Satornino, C. B., Hughes, D. E., & Ferris, G. R. (2015). Social networks within sales organizations: Their development and importance for salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 79(6), 1–16.Google Scholar
  15. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181.Google Scholar
  16. Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. E., III. (2006). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. Managing Innovation and Change, 155–169.Google Scholar
  17. Burkus, D. (2015a). Inside Adobe’s Innovation Kit. Retrieved October 28, 2018 from https://hbr.org/2015/02/inside-adobes-innovation-kit
  18. Burkus, D. (2015b). Let Your Frontline Workers Be Creative. Retrieved October 28, 2018 from https://hbr.org/2015/12/let-your-frontline-workers-be-creative
  19. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  20. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.Google Scholar
  21. Chen, Y.-C., Li, P.-C., & Arnold, T. J. (2013). Effects of collaborative communication on the development of market-relating capabilities and relational performance metrics in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1181–1191.Google Scholar
  22. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Chesbrough, H. (2011). Bringing open innovation to services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 85.Google Scholar
  24. Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation New Frontiers in Open Innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Chesbrough, H., Kim, S., & Agogino, A. (2014). Chez Panisse: Building an open innovation ecosystem. California Management Review, 56(4), 144–171.Google Scholar
  26. Choudhury, P. (2017). Innovation outcomes in a distributed organization: Intrafirm mobility and access to resources. Organization Science, 28(2), 339–354.Google Scholar
  27. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544–560.Google Scholar
  28. Cornelissen, J. (2017). S comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  29. Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928–937.Google Scholar
  30. Cunningham, L. F., Young, C. E., Lee, M., & Ulaga, W. (2004). Comparing perceived service dimensions for US and French consumers. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(6), 421–432.Google Scholar
  31. Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.Google Scholar
  32. Doiron, D. (2015). What business is Zara in? HBS no. W15431. Boston: Harvard Business Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 230–251.Google Scholar
  34. Doty, D. H., Glick, W. H., & Huber, G. P. (1993). Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1196–1250.Google Scholar
  35. Edmondson, A. C., & Harvey, J. (2016). Open innovation at Fujitsu. HBS no. 9–616-034. Boston: Harvard Business Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Fahey, L., & Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, 40(3), 265–276.Google Scholar
  37. Fang, E. (2008). Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 90–104.Google Scholar
  38. Forte, A., & Lampe, C. (2013). Defining, understanding, and supporting open collaboration: Lessons from the literature. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 535–547.Google Scholar
  39. Furr, N. R., & Dyer, J. (2014). The innovator's method: Bringing the lean startup into your organization. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  40. Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Research notes and communications: Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193–1201.Google Scholar
  41. Gittelman, M. (2007). Does geography matter for science-based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology. Organization Science, 18(4), 724–741.Google Scholar
  42. Gonzalez, G. R., Claro, D. P., & Palmatier, R. W. (2014). Synergistic effects of relationship managers' social networks on sales performance. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 76–94.Google Scholar
  43. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.Google Scholar
  44. Grönroos, C. (2007). Service management and marketing: Customer management in service. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  45. Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20(2), 422–440.Google Scholar
  46. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.Google Scholar
  47. Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232–248.Google Scholar
  48. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716–749.Google Scholar
  49. Hartmann, N. N., Wieland, H., & Vargo, S. L. (2017). From the dyad to the service ecosystem: Broadening and building theory in sales—An abstract. In Marketing at the Confluence between Entertainment and Analytics (pp. 787–788). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. He, L. (2013). Google’s Secrets of Innovation: Empowering Its Employees. Retrieved October 28, 2018 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurahe/2013/03/29/googles-secrets-of-innovation-empowering-its-employees/#3737129257e7.
  51. Homburg, C., Wieseke, J., & Bornemann, T. (2009). Implementing the marketing concept at the employee–customer interface: The role of customer need knowledge. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 64–81.Google Scholar
  52. Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172.Google Scholar
  53. Hult, G. T. M., Mena, J. A., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2011). Stakeholder marketing: A definition and conceptual framework. AMS review, 1(1), 44–65.Google Scholar
  54. Hunt, S. D. (1991). Modern marketing theory: Critical issues in the philosophy of marketing science. South-Western Pub..Google Scholar
  55. Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.Google Scholar
  56. Jong, M., Marston, N., Roth, E. (2015). The Eight Essentials of Innovation. Retrieved October 28, 2018 from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-eight-essentials-of-innovation.
  57. Karlsson, J., & Skålén, P. (2015). Exploring front-line employee contributions to service innovation. European Journal of Marketing, 49(9/10), 1346–1365.Google Scholar
  58. Lages, C. R., & Piercy, N. F. (2012). Key drivers of frontline employee generation of ideas for customer service improvement. Journal of Service Research, 15(2), 215–230.Google Scholar
  59. Lam, S. K., Kraus, F., & Ahearne, M. (2010). The diffusion of market orientation throughout the organization: A social learning theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 61–79.Google Scholar
  60. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Claycomb, V., & Inks, L. W. (2000). From recipient to contributor: Examining customer roles and experienced outcomes. European Journal of Marketing, 34(3/4), 359–383.Google Scholar
  61. Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.Google Scholar
  62. Levine, S. S., & Prietula, M. J. (2013). Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance. Organization Science, 25(5), 114–1433.Google Scholar
  63. Liao, H., & Chuang, A. (2004). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 41–58.Google Scholar
  64. Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Bryson, J. R. (2011). Openness, knowledge, innovation and growth in UK business services. Research Policy, 40(10), 1438–1452.Google Scholar
  65. Lovelock, C. H. (1983). Classifying services to gain strategic marketing insights. The Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 9–20.Google Scholar
  66. Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & Tanniru, M. (2010). Service, value networks and learning. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(1), 19–31.Google Scholar
  67. Magnusson, P. R., Matthing, J., & Kristensson, P. (2003). Managing user involvement in service innovation experiments with innovating end users. Journal of Service Research, 6(2), 111–124.Google Scholar
  68. Mankins, M., & Garton, E. (2017). How Spotify balances employee autonomy and accountability. Retrieved October 28, 2018 from https://hbr.org/2017/02/how-spotify-balances-employee-autonomy-and-accountability.
  69. Marrone, J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36(4), 911–940.Google Scholar
  70. Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J., & Robertson, B. (2006). The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17(1), 64–79.Google Scholar
  71. Melton, H. L., & Hartline, M. D. (2010). Customer and frontline employee influence on new service development performance. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 411–425.Google Scholar
  72. Melton, H. L., & Hartline, M. D. (2013). Employee collaboration, learning orientation, and new service development performance. Journal of Service Research, 16(1), 67–81.Google Scholar
  73. Menor, L. J., Tatikonda, M. V., & Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: Areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20(2), 135–157.Google Scholar
  74. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562.Google Scholar
  75. Mina, A., Bascavusoglu-Moreau, E., & Hughes, A. (2014). Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledge. Research Policy, 43(5), 853–866.Google Scholar
  76. Netflix Culture. (2018). Retrieved January 03, 2019 from https://jobs.netflix.com/culture.
  77. Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  78. Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479–516.Google Scholar
  79. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.Google Scholar
  80. Reinholt, M. I. A., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Why a central network position isn't enough: The role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1277–1297.Google Scholar
  81. Ringel, M., Taylor, A., & Zablit, H. (2016). The world’s most innovative companies: 4 Things that differentiate them. HBS no. ROT318-PDF-ENG. Boston: Harvard Business Publishing.Google Scholar
  82. Sandefur, R. L., & Laumann, E. O. (2000). A paradigm for social capital. In Knowledge and Social Capital (pp. 69–87).Google Scholar
  83. Santos-Vijande, M. L., López-Sánchez, J. Á., & Rudd, J. (2016). Frontline employees’ collaboration in industrial service innovation: Routes of co-creation’s effects on new service performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 350–375.Google Scholar
  84. Schepers, J. J., Nijssen, E. J., & van der Heijden, G. A. (2016). Innovation in the frontline: Exploring the relationship between role conflict, ideas for improvement, and employee service performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(4), 797–817.Google Scholar
  85. Selnes, F., & Sallis, J. (2003). Promoting relationship learning. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 80–95.Google Scholar
  86. Singh, J., Brady, M., Arnold, T., & Brown, T. (2017). The emergent field of organizational frontlines. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
  87. Solomon, M. (2017). Tony Hsieh reveals the secret to Zappos’ customer Service in one Word. Retrieved January 03, 2019 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/micahsolomon/2017/06/12/tony-hsieh-spills-the-beans-the-one-word-secret-of-zappos-customer-service-success/#58a5ae0e1acc.
  88. Sørensen, F., Sundbo, J., & Mattsson, J. (2013). Organizational conditions for service encounter-based innovation. Research Policy, 42(8), 1446–1456.Google Scholar
  89. Stock, R. M., & Zacharias, N. A. (2011). Patterns and performance outcomes of innovation orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 870–888.Google Scholar
  90. Subramanian, A. M., Lim, K., & Soh, P. H. (2013). When birds of a feather don’t flock together: Different scientists and the roles they play in biotech R&D alliances. Research Policy, 42(3), 595–612.Google Scholar
  91. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43.Google Scholar
  92. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33(47), 74.Google Scholar
  93. Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 60–76.Google Scholar
  94. Tortoriello, M., & Krackhardt, D. (2010). Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 167–181.Google Scholar
  95. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.Google Scholar
  96. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.Google Scholar
  97. Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504.Google Scholar
  98. Van der Heijden, G. A., Schepers, J. J., Nijssen, E. J., & Ordanini, A. (2013). Don’t just fix it, make it better! Using frontline service employees to improve recovery performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5), 515–530.Google Scholar
  99. Van Riel, A. C., Ouwersloot, J., & Lemmink, J. G. A. M. (2003). Antecedents of effective decision making: A cognitive approach.Google Scholar
  100. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  101. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  102. Vroom, G., & Sastre, I. (2016). Spotify in 2016: Facing Increased Competition. IESE Business School, University of Navarra.Google Scholar
  103. West, J., & Bogers, M. (2017). Open innovation: Current status and research opportunities. Innovation, 19(1), 43–50.Google Scholar
  104. Woisetschläger, D. M., Hanning, D., & Backhaus, C. (2016). Why frontline employees engage as idea collectors: An assessment of underlying motives and critical success factors. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 109–116.Google Scholar
  105. Yamkovenko, B., & Tavares, S. (2017). To Understand Whether Your Company is Inclusive – Map How your Employees Interact. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved January 03, 2019 from https://hbr.org/2017/07/to-understand-whether-your-company-is-inclusive-map-how-your-employees-interact.
  106. Ye, J., Marinova, D., & Singh, J. (2012). Bottom-up learning in marketing frontlines: Conceptualization, processes, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(6), 821–844.Google Scholar
  107. Zappos Insights. (2018). The Zappos Culture Book. Retrieved January 03, 2019 from https://www.zapposinsights.com/culture-book/digital-version.
  108. Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2008). Services marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business & EconomicsUniversity of MelbourneCarltonAustralia
  2. 2.Weatherhead School of ManagementCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Melbourne Business SchoolUniversity of MelbourneCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations