AMS Review

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 86–102 | Cite as

Corporate societal responsibility in marketing: normatively broadening the concept

  • Patrick E. Murphy
  • Magdalena Öberseder
  • Gene R. Laczniak
Article

Abstract

The premise of this paper is that corporate societal responsibility in marketing should go far beyond traditionally conceived corporate social responsibility (CSR). Admittedly, some typical efforts like philanthropy and executive volunteerism do have a distinct social component, but in recent years much CSR activity, including choices for corporate charity, are instrumentally infused with branding, product development, supply chain construction and a host of other strategic marketing decisions by corporations. This paper briefly reviews relevant CSR writings, presents a new definition of corporate societal responsibility in marketing, and advances several foundational premises for responsible marketing practice. Implications are drawn for both marketing scholarship and marketing management.

Keywords

Corporate responsibility Marketing ethics Business ethics Social contract theory 

References

  1. Abela, A. V., & Murphy, P. E. (2008). Marketing with integrity: ethics and the service-dominant logic for marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agle, B. R., Thomas Donaldson, R., Freeman, E., Jensen, M. C., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. (2008). Dialogue: toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Marketing Association, AMA (2007), “Definition of Marketing,” (accessed 1.2.2010, 2010), [available at http://www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/DefinitionofMarketing.aspx?sq=definition+of+marketing].
  5. Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (2008). Does demand fall when customers perceive that prices are unfair? The case of premium pricing for large sizes. Marketing Science, 27(3), 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, W. T., Jr., & Cunningham, W. H. (1972). The socially conscious consumer. Journal of Marketing, 36(3), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, S., & Cavanagh, J. (2005). Field guide to the global economy (2nd ed.). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  8. Audi, R., & Murphy, P. E. (2006). The many faces of integrity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bachman, K. (2012). FTC repost food marketing to children down 19.5%: Commission urges holdout companies and media to self-regulate,” AdWeek, (December 12).Google Scholar
  10. Balch, O. (2013). Stakeholder engagement: Masters of crisis management. Ethical Corporation, (December-January), 28–31.Google Scholar
  11. Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 106–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartels, R. (1967). A model for ethics in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bellizzi, J. A., & Hite, R. E. (1989). Supervising unethical salesforce behavior. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bolton, L. E., Keh, H. T., & Alba, J. W. (2010). How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture? Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 47(3), 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burchell, J., & Cook, J. (2008). Stakholder dialogue and organizational learning: changing relationships between companies and NGOs. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, J. L. (2007a). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An instituational theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Campbell, M. C. (2007b). “Says who?!” How the source of price information and affect influence perceived price (Un)fairness. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 44(2), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caruana, R., & Crane, A. (2008). Constructing consumer responsibility: exploring the role of corporate communications. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1495–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). ISO 26000 and Supply Chains—On the Diffustion of the Social Responsibility Standard. International Journal of Production Economics, 111, 274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  22. Clifton, R. (2009). Brands and branding. New York: Bloomberg Press.Google Scholar
  23. Coca-Cola (2008/09), “Sustainability Review.”Google Scholar
  24. Conroy, M. E. (2007). Branded!: How the “Certification Revolution” is Transforming Global Corporations. Canada: New Society Publisher.Google Scholar
  25. Darling-Smith, B. (Ed.). (2007). Responsibility. UK: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  26. DeGeorge, R. T. (2010). Business ethics. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Devinney, T. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Donaldson, T. & Dunfee T.W. (1999). Ties that bind - A Social contracts approach to business ethics. Harward Business School Press.Google Scholar
  30. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  31. Drumwright, M. E. (1994). Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Drumwright, M. E. (1996). Company advertising with a social dimension: the role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dunfee, T. W., Craig Smith, N., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (1999). Social contracts and marketing ethics. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Ethisphere (2011). World’s most ethical companies. accessed at http://ethisphere.com/2011-worlds-most-ethical-companies/
  36. European, Commission (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility2009. [available at http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/index_en.htm].
  37. Ferrell, O. C., Gonzalez-Padron, T. L., Tomas, G., Hult, M., & Maignan, I. (2010). From market orientation to stakeholder orientation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(1), 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. K. (2008). A macromarketing ethics framework: Stakeholder orientation and distributive justice. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(1), 28–42.Google Scholar
  39. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  41. French, P. A. (1984). Collective and corporate responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Goodpaster, K. E. (2009). Corporate responsibility and its constituents. In G. G. Brenkert & T. L. Beauchamp (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Goolsby, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. (1992). Cognitive moral development and marketing. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hsieh, H. (2009). Does global business have a responsibility to promote just institutions? Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
  48. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: a revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Knight, G., & Greenberg, J. (2002). Promotionalism and subpolitics: nike and its labor critics. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kotler, P. (1972). What consumerism means for marketers. Harvard Business Review, 50, 48–57.Google Scholar
  51. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility—doing the most good for your company and your Cause. New Jersy: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Laczniak, G. R., & Kennedy, A.-M. (2011). Hyper norms: searching for a global code of conduct. Journal of Macromarketing, 31(3), 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2008). Distributive justice: pressing questions, emerging directions, and the promise of rawlsian analysis. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2006). Normative Perspectives for Ethical and Socially Responsible Marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2012). Stakeholder Theory and Marketing: Moving from a Firm-Centric to a Societal Perspective. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(2), 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lusch, R. & Webster, F. (2011). A stakeholder-unifying, co-creation philosophy for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 31(2), 129–134.Google Scholar
  58. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2005). A stakeholder model for implementing social responsibility in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 956–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mascarenhas, O. A. J. (1995). Exonerating unethical marketing behaviors: a diagnostic framework. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: the emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  64. Murphy, P. E., Kangun, N., & Locander, W. B. (1978). Environmentally concerned consumers—racial variations. Journal of Marketing, 42(4), 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrasss, J. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): models and theories of stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 745–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parsons, T. (1960). A sociological approach to the theory of organizations. In T. Parsons (Ed.), Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  67. Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pollay, R.W. (1986). The distorted mirror: reflections on the unintended consequences of advertising. Journal of Marketing (April), 18–36.Google Scholar
  69. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  70. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  71. Post, J. E., & Waddock, S. A. (1995). Strategic philanthropy and partnerships for economic progress. In R. F. America (Ed.), Philanthropy and economic development. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  72. Robin, D. P., & Reidenbach, R. E. (1987). Social responsibility, ethics, and marketing strategy: closing the gap between concept and application. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibiltiy: business and society seen from a habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Scott, R.W. (2008). Institutions and organizations—Ideas and interests (3rd Edition ed.): Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  75. Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Öberseder, M. (2010). Half a century of marketing ethics: shifting perspectives and emerging trends. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sen, S., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: a social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sheth, J. N., Nirmal, J. N., Sethia, K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainable consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, N. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Not whether, but how?. California Management Review.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, N. C., & Lenssen, G. (2009). Mainstreaming corporate responsibility. West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Smith, N. C., Palazzo, G., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2010). Marketing’s consequences: stakeholder marketing and supply chain corporate social responsibility issues. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 617–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Solomon, R. (1992). Ethics and excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Sparks, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. (1998). Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Swartz, J. (2010). Timberland’s CEO on standing up to 65,000 angry activists. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 39–127.Google Scholar
  86. Vaaland, T. I., Morten, H., & Kjell, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context. European Journal of Marketing, 42(9/10), 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: a coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Webster, F. E., Jr. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Williams, J. & Aitken, R. (2011). The service-dominant logic of marketing and marketing ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, published online in March.Google Scholar
  91. Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick E. Murphy
    • 1
  • Magdalena Öberseder
    • 2
  • Gene R. Laczniak
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.GfK AustriaViennaAustria
  3. 3.College of Business AdministrationMarquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations