Advertisement

AMS Review

, Volume 1, Issue 3–4, pp 154–170 | Cite as

Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes

  • Marco Wolf
  • Shaun McQuitty
Article

Abstract

Do-it-yourself (DIY) is an increasingly popular consumer behavior, but little is known about this large consumer segment. We undertake a depth interview study and review diverse literatures to develop a conceptual model of DIY behavior that explores the reasons why consumers DIY and the benefits they receive. The purpose of the model is to improve our understanding of a consumer segment that, in many ways, behaves differently from typical consumers. Research propositions are derived and discussions of implications and ideas for future research follow.

Keywords

Do-it-yourself (DIY) Consumer behavior Motivations Outcomes Prosumption 

References

  1. Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing, 79(2), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auh, S., Bell, S. J., McLeod, C. S., & Shih, E. (2007). Co-production and customer loyalty in financial services. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auster, C. J. (2001). Transcending potential antecedents leisure constraints: the case of women motorcycle operators. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(3), 272–298.Google Scholar
  4. Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515.Google Scholar
  5. Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2008). The service dominant logic and the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateson, J. E. (1985). Self-service consumer: an exploratory study. Journal of Retailing, 61(3), 49–76.Google Scholar
  7. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloch, P. H., Ridgeway, N. M., & Sherrell, D. L. (1986). Extending the concept of shopping: an investigation of browsing activity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blodgett, J. G., Wakefield, K. L., & Barnes, J. H. (1995). The effects of customer service on consumer complaining behavior. Journal of Services Marketing, 9(4), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogdon, A. S. (1996). Homeowner renovation and repair: the decision to hire someone else to do the project. Journal of Housing Economics, 5(4), 323–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brace-Govan, J. (2004). Weighty matters: control of women’s access to physical strength. The Sociological Review, 52(4), 503–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bridenbaugh, C. (1950). The colonial craftsman. New York: NY University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. A., & Gunst, R. F. (2005). Spreading the word: investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bush, A., Menon, A., & Smart, D. (1987). Media habits of the do-it-yourselfers. Journal of Advertising Research, 27(5), 14–20.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, C. (2005). The craft consumer: culture, craft, and consumption in a postmodern society. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campo, K., Gijsbrechts, E., & Nisol, P. (2004). Dynamics in consumer response to product unavailability: do stock-out reaction signal response to permanent assortment reductions? Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 834–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Close, A. G., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2009). Market resistance and valentine's day events. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corstjens, J., & Corstjens, M. (1995). Store wars: The battle for mindspace and shelfspace. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Crittenden, V. L., Crittenden, W. F., Ferrell, L. K., Ferrell, O. C., & Pinney, C. C. (2011). Market-oriented sustainability: a conceptual framework and propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: an investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. L. (1999). A meta-analysis review of experiments examining effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emmelhainz, M. A., Stock, J. R., & Emmelhainz, L. W. (1991). Consumer response to retail stock-outs. Journal of Retailing, 67(2), 138–147.Google Scholar
  23. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fitzsimons, G. J. (2000). Consumer response to stockouts. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franke, N., Keinz, P., & Steger, C. J. (2009). Testing value of customization: when do customers really prefer products tailored to their preferences? Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, T. E. (2002). Enjoying goal directed action: the role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freysinger, V., & Flannery, D. (1992). Women’s leisure: affiliation, self-determination, empowerment and resistance? Loisir et Societe: Society and Leisure, 15(1), 303–321.Google Scholar
  29. Gebhardt, G. F., Carpenter, G. S., & Sherry, J. F. (2006). Creating a market orientation: a longitudinal, multifirm, grounded analysis of cultural transformation. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gelber, S. M. (1997). Do-it-yourself: constructing, repairing and maintaining domestic masculinity. American Quarterly, 49(1), 66–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  32. Holbrook, M. B. (2006). ROSEPEKICECIVECI vs. CCV: the resource-operant, skills-exchanging, performance-experiencing, knowledge-informed, competence-enacting, co-producer-involved, value-emerging, customer-interactive view of marketing versus the concept of customer value: “I can get if for you wholesale”. In R. Lusch & S. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 208–223). New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  33. Home Improvement Research Institute. (2011). The September home improvement products market sales forecast grew 2.8% in 2011 with an increase in 2012 to 4.0%. Retrieved October 20, 2011 from http://www.hiri.org/?page=Media.
  34. Hornik, J., & Feldman, L. P. (1982). Retailing implications of the do-it-yourself consumer movement. Journal of Retailing, 58(2), 44–63.Google Scholar
  35. Humphreys, A., & Grayson, K. (2008). The intersecting roles of consumer and producer: a critical perspective on co-production, co-creation and prosumption. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Institut für Freizeitwirtschaft. (1999). Strukturwandel im deutschen diy-markt. Retreived September 18, 2011 from http://tourismus-projekt.de/pdf/strukturwandel.pdf.
  37. John, D. R. (1999). Consumer socialization of children: a retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson, J. S., & Wilson, L. E. (2005). It says you really care: motivational factors of contemporary female handcrafters. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 23(2), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kahle, L. R. (1983). Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America. New York: Praeger Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Kotler, P. (1986a). The prosumer movement: a new challenge for marketers. Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1), 510–513.Google Scholar
  41. Kotler, P. (1986b). Prosumers: a new type of consumer. Futurist, 20(5), 24–29.Google Scholar
  42. Lastovicka, J. L., Bettencourt, L. A., Hughner, R. S., & Kuntze, R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lepper, M. R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning ‘play’ into work and ‘work’ into play: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 257–307). New York, NY: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ligas, M. (2000). People, products, and pursuits: exploring the relationship between consumers’ goals and product meaning. Psychology and Marketing, 17(11), 983–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lusch, R. F., Brown, S., & Brunswick, G. J. (1992). A generic framework for explaining internal vs. external exchange. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(2), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Comparing through service: insights from the service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: a new individual differences scale. Psychology and Marketing, 14(6), 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin, M. A. (2002). Consumer response to discontinuance of favorite products: an exploratory study. Advances in Consumer Research, 29(1), 249–250.Google Scholar
  50. Min, K. S., & West, P. M. (2003). Consumer response to product unavailability. Advances in Consumer Research, 30, 197–198.Google Scholar
  51. Moschis, G. P. (1981). Patterns of consumer learning. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 9(2), 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nail, P. R. (1986). Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response. Psychology Bulletin, 100(2), 190–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Norton, M., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2011). The “IKEA Effect”: When labor leads to love. Working Paper 11-091, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  54. Payne, A., Storbacka, K., Frow, P., & Knox, S. (2009). Co-creating brands: diagnosing and designing the relationship experience. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peck, J., & Wiggins, J. (2006). It just feels good: customers’ affective response to touch and its influence on persuasion. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pollakowski, H. O. (1988). The determinants of residential renovation and repair activity. Final Report Prepared for the Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  57. Reynolds, J. T. (1985). Implications for value research: a macro vs. micro perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 2(4), 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schreier, M. (2006). The value increment of mass-customized products: an empirical assessment. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 5(4), 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwartzlander, A., & Bowers, J. S. (1989). Relationships between consumer characteristics and do-it-yourself behaviour (do-it-yourself activity). Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 13(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sen, S., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: a social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shaw, S. M. (2001). Conceptualizing resistance: women’s leisure as political practice. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(2), 186–201.Google Scholar
  63. Silverstein, M. J., & Sayre, K. (2009). The female economy. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 46–53.Google Scholar
  64. Simonson, I. (2005). Determinants of customers’ responses to customized offers: conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sloot, L. M., & Verhoef, P. C. (2008). The impact of brand delisting on store switching and brand switching intentions. Journal of Retailing, 84(3), 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sloot, L. M., Verhoef, P. C., & Franses, P. H. (2005). The impact of brand equity and the hedonic level of products on consumer stock-out reactions. Journal of Retailing, 81(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Snyder, R. C., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: the development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  69. Tian, K., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ Need for uniqueness: scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: William Morrow and Company Inc.Google Scholar
  71. Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007). Rethinking customer solutions: from product bundles to relational processes. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Valenzuela, A., Dhar, R., & Zettelmeyer, F. (2009). Contingent response to self-customization procedures: implications for decision satisfaction and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 754–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., & Horowitz, D. M. (2006). A voice from the silent masses: an exploratory and comparative analysis of noncomplainers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Watson, M., & Shove, E. (2008). Product, competence, project and practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weaven, S., & Herington, S. (2006). Female franchisors: how different are they from independent business owners? Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10(4), http://www.amsreview.org/articles/weaven07-2006.pdf.
  77. Wheaton, B., & Tomlinson, A. (1998). The changing gender order in sport? The case of windsurfing subculture. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 22(3), 252–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Williams, C. C. (2008). Re-thinking the motives of do-it-yourself (DIY) consumers. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(3), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, C. C. (2004). A lifestyle choice? Evaluating the motives of do-it-yourself (DIY) consumers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 32(5), 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., & Troye, S. V. (2008). Trying to prosume: toward a theory of consumers as co-creators of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yuksel, U., & Mryteza, V. (2009). An evaluation of strategic responses to consumer boycotts. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 248–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perception of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and syntheses of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MarketingUniversity of Southern MississippiLong BeachUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of BusinessAthabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada

Personalised recommendations