Advertisement

International Journal of Early Childhood

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 327–346 | Cite as

Pedagogical Play Types: What Do They Suggest for Learning About Sustainability in Early Childhood Education?

  • Susan Edwards
  • Amy Cutter-Mackenzie
Original Article

Abstract

Sustainability education is increasingly understood as necessary for young children. An important aspect of early childhood sustainability education is associated with how best to integrate the conceptual basis of sustainability education with existing play-based pedagogies. Play-based pedagogies can be understood as occurring along a continuum, including more open-ended and freely chosen play to more teacher orientated play-based activities. Each of these play types suggests different opportunities for teacher's engagement with children’s learning. This paper examines how three different types of play-based pedagogy, including open-ended, modelled and purposefully framed play, prompt teacher planning for children’s learning about biodiversity as a knowledge subset of sustainability education. Vygotsky’s description of combinatorial activity is used to consider the extent to which each play type prompts teachers to plan for children’s engagement with biodiversity concepts in ways that are most likely to support knowledge construction.

Keywords

Sustainability Early childhood education Play-based learning 

Résumé

L'éducation au développement durable est de plus en plus considérée nécessaire pourles jeunes enfants. Un aspect important de l'éducation au développement durable estassocié à la meilleure façon d'intégrer le fondement conceptuel du développement durable aux pédagogies existantes, axées sur le jeu. Les pédagogies axées sur le jeu peuvent être comprises comme situées le long d'un continuum, allant de plus ouverte avec choix libre du jeu jusqu'à des activités axées sur le jeu plus dirigées par l'enseignant. Chacun de ces types de jeu suggère des occasions différentes d'implication des enseignants dans l'apprentissage des enfants. Cet article examine la façon dont trois différents types de pédagogie axée sur le jeu, soit jeu libre ouvert, modélisé et encadré dans un but spécifique, poussent l'enseignant à planifier en vue de l'apprentissage de la biodiversité comme sous-ensemble de la connaissance en éducation au développement durable. La description de Vygotsky de l'activité combinatoire est utilisée pour voir à quel point chaque type de jeu amène les enseignants à planifier pour que les enfants s'engagent dans les concepts de la biodiversité, des façons les plus susceptibles de soutenir la construction de connaissances.

Resumen

La sostenibilidad en la educación o educación sustentable, se entiende cada vez más como algo necesario para la formación de los niños pequeños. Un aspecto importante de la educación sustentable para la edad temprana está asociado con cómo es mejor integrar el concepto base de sostenibilidad en la educación con pedagogías existentes basadas en el juego. Las pedagogías basadas en el juego pueden ser entendidas como un continuo, incluyendo un juego más abierto y libremente elegido, así como actividades basadas en el juego orientadas más hacia los profesores y sus estrategias. Cada uno de estos tipos de juegos, sugieren diferentes oportunidades para que los profesores se comprometan con el aprendizaje de los niños. Este artículo examina cómo tres tipos distintos de pedagogías basadas en el juego, incluyendo aquellas abiertas, modeladas y con un propósito enmarcado, apuntan a la planificación de los profesores hacia el aprendizaje de los niños acerca de biodiversidad, como un conocimiento que corresponde a un subconjunto de la Educación Sustentable. La descripción de Vygotsky sobre actividad combinatoria es usada para considerar el grado en el que cada tipo de juego apunta a que los profesores planifiquen para el compromiso de los niños con el concepto de biodiversidad de una forma en la que sea más plausible apoyar la construcción del conocimiento.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper was supported by funding from the Australian Research Council under the Discovery Project Scheme and with ethical approval from the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development and the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee. The authors wish to thank the participating children, families and teachers for their contribution to the work. The authors also wish to acknowledge support with fieldwork and data management provided by Deb Moore, Tracy Young, Sylvia Almedia and Tiffany Cutter. Data collection for this project was conducted whilst both authors were employed at Monash University.

References

  1. Ball, D., & Forzani, F. (2007). What makes education research ‘educational’? Educational Researcher, 36(9), 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchard, P., & Buchanan, T. (2011). Environmental stewardship in early childhood. Childhood Education, Summer, 87(4), 233–238.Google Scholar
  3. Blay, J., & Ireson, J. (2009). Pedagogical beliefs, activity choice and structure, and adult-child interaction in nursery classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1105–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brundtland, G. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development. Our common future. Transmitted to the general assembly as an annex to United Nations general assembly document A/42/427. Part 2.1.Google Scholar
  5. Chawla, L. (2006). Learning to love the natural world enough to protect it. Barn, 2, 57–78.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S., & Ball, D. (2003). Resources, instruction and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CutterMackenzie, A., & Edwards, S. (2009). Video-based research methodologies: Possibilities and challenges for early childhood education research. Paper presented at the 11th New Zealand early childhood research conference, January. Wellington: New Zealand.Google Scholar
  9. Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Edwards, S. (2006). Everyday environmental education experiences: The role of content in early childhood education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 22(2), 13–19.Google Scholar
  10. Diachenko, O. (2011). On major developments in preschoolers’ imagination. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(1), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dockett, S. (2010). The challenge of play for early childhood education. In S. Rogers (Ed.), Rethinking play and pedagogy in early childhood education. Concepts, contexts and cultures (pp. 32–48). Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
  12. Duhn, I. (2012). Making ‘place’ for ecological sustainability in early childhood education. Environmental Education Research, 18(1), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duncan, J. (2009). Intentional teaching. Early childhood education educate. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, S., & Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2011). Environmentalizing early childhood curriculum through play-based pedagogies. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(1), 51–59.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, S., CutterMackenzie, A., & Hunt, E. (2010). Framing play for learning: Professional reflections on the role of open-ended play in early childhood education. In L. Brooker, & S. Edwards (Eds.), Engaging play. Open University Press: London.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, S., & Davis, J. (2009). Exploring the resistance: An Australian perspective on educating for sustainability in early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Epstein, A. (2007). The intentional teacher. Choosing the best strategies for young children’s leaning. Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  18. Fleer, M. (2008). A cultural-historical perspective on play: Play as a leading activity across cultural communities. In I. Pramling-Samuelesson & M. Fleer (Eds.), Play and learning in early childhood settings (pp. 1–17). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleer, M. (2010). Concepts in play: A cultural historical view of early learning and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fleer, M. (2011). ‘Conceptual play’: Foregrounding imagination and cognition during concept formation in early years education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(3), 224–240.Google Scholar
  21. Grieshaber, S. (2008). Interrupting stereotypes: Teaching and the education of young children. Early Childhood Education and Development, 19(3), 505–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hägglund, S., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2009). Early childhood education and learning for sustainable development and citizenship. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hatch, A. (2010). Rethinking the relationship between learning and development: Teaching for learning in early childhood classrooms. The Educational Forum, 74(2), 58–68.Google Scholar
  24. Hedges, H. (2011). Connecting ‘snippets of knowledge’: Teachers’ understandings of the concept of working theories. Early Years. An International Journal of Research and Development, 31(3), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hedges, H., Cullen, J., & Jordan, B. (2011). Early years curriculum: Funds of knowledge as a conceptual framework for children’s interests. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(2), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howitt, C., Lewis, S., & Upson, E. (2011). ‘It’s a mystery!’ A case study of implementing forensic science in preschool as scientific inquiry. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(3), 45–55.Google Scholar
  27. Hughes, F. (1995). Children, play and development (2nd ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  28. Independent Earth Charter Commission. (2012). The earth charter. Retrieved from http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/pages/Read-the-Charter.html
  29. Langford, R. (2010). Critiquing child-centred pedagogy to bring children and early childhood educators into thecentre of a democratic pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Littledyke, M., & McCrea, N. (2009). Starting sustainability early: Young children exploring people and places. In M. Littledyke, N. Taylor, & C. Eames (Eds.), Education for sustainability in the primary curriculum (pp. 39–57). Palgrave McMillan: Melbourne.Google Scholar
  31. Liu, L. (2011). Where in the world of sustainability education is US geography? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(2), 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mackey, G. (2011). To know, to decide, to act: The young child’s right to participate in action for the environment. Environmental Educational Research, 18(4), 1–12.Google Scholar
  33. Peters, S., & Davis, K. (2011). Fostering children’s working theories: Pedagogic issues and dilemmas in New Zealand. Early Years. An International Journal of Research andDevelopment, 31(1), 5–19.Google Scholar
  34. Pramling-Samuelson, I., & Carlsson, M. (2008). The playing learning child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prince, C. (2010). Sowing the seeds: Education for sustainability within the early years curriculum. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(3), 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rubin, K. H., Fein, G. G., & Vandenberg, B. (1983). Play. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Socialization, personality, and social development (Vol. 4, 4th edn., pp. 694–774). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Shaffer, L., Hall, E., & Lynch, M. (2009). Toddlers scientific explorations. Encounters with insects. Young Children, 64(6), 18–41.Google Scholar
  38. Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., & Melhuish, E. (2008). Towards the transformation of practice in early childhood education: The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stephen, C. (2010). Pedagogy: The silent partner in early years learning. Early Years An International Journal of Research and Development, 30(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sylva, K., Taggart, B., Siraj-Blatchford, Totskika, V., Ereky-Stevens, K., Gilden, R., & Bell, D. (2007). Curricular quality and day to day learning activities in pres-school. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15(1), 49–65.Google Scholar
  41. Trawick-Smith, J. (2008). Play and the curriculum. In J. Frost, S. Wortham, & S. Reifel (Eds.), Play and child development (3rd edn.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Tzuo, P. (2007). The tension between teacher control and children’s freedom in a child-centred classroom: Resolving the practical dilemma through a closer look at the related theories. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(1), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vu, J., Han, M., & Buell, M. (2012). Preserving play in early childhood classrooms: Suggestions for early childhood teacher education and policy. In L. Cohen, & S. Waite-Stupiansky (Eds.), Play: A polyphony of research, theories, and issues (pp. 207–223). University Press of America: Maryland.Google Scholar
  44. Vygotsky, L. (1976). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In J. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva. (Eds.), Play. Its role in development and evolution (pp. 537–555). Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
  45. Vygotsky, L. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1: Problems of general psychology. Plenum Press: New York.Google Scholar
  46. Vygotsky, L. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.Google Scholar
  47. Wallerstedt, C., & Pramling, N. (2012). Learning to play in a goal directed practice. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wood, E. (2007). Reconceptualising child-centred education: Contemporary directions in policy, theory and practice in early childhood. Forum, 49(1), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wood, L. (2010). Reconceptualizing the play-pedagogy relationship. From control to complexity. In L. Brooker, & S. Edwards (Eds.), Engaging play (pp. 11-25). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wood, E., & Attfield, J. (2005). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  51. Youngquist, J., & Patray-Ching, J. (2004). Revisiting ‘play’: Analysing and articulating acts of inquiry. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(3), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityFitzroyAustralia
  2. 2.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations