Advertisement

Wetlands

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Nutrient Inputs and Hydrology Interact with Plant Functional Type in Affecting Plant Production and Nutrient Contents in a Wet Grassland

  • Keith R. EdwardsEmail author
  • Hana Čížková
General Wetland Science

Abstract

We studied the effect of nutrient additions and hydrology on the above-ground production and shoot nutrient contents of representative species of the conservative (Carex acuta) and competitive (Glyceria maxima) plant functional types in a minerotrophic wet grassland. Above-ground samples were collected in May, late June (time of maximum biomass) and August (re-growth following cutting) from plots subjected to nutrient addition treatments in years with differing hydrology, ranging from drought to prolonged flooding. Net above-ground primary production (NAPP) and shoot nutrient contents (C, N, P) were determined separately for C. acuta and G. maxima. Between-year and species differences were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and generalized linear mixed models (GLMM). NAPP decreased with hydrologic stress with the proportion due to C. acuta increasing with flooding, while G. maxima responded positively to nutrient additions. As expected, C% was greater, but N and P% were lower, in C. acuta shoots compared to G. maxima. Hydrology affected above-ground production and shoot nutrient contents more than nutrients, but both interacted with plant functional type, with likely impacts on ecosystem processes. Future studies must consider multiple factors to predict the effect of climate and management changes on wetlands.

Keywords

Carex Glyceria Hydrology Nutrient addition Plant functional type 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this study came from a grant from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (GAČR: 16-21743S and 526/09/1545). We thank members of the Třeboň Basin Biosphere Reserve, especially Ladislav Rektoris and Miroslav Hatle, for access to the site. Many people helped in collecting and processing the plant samples including Mirka Káplová, Daniel Vaněk, Lukaš Bareš, Ville Närhi, Marketa Applová and Pavla Staňková.

Supplementary material

13157_2019_1216_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 36 kb)

References

  1. Aerts R, Chapin FS (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research 30:1–67Google Scholar
  2. Akaike H (1987) Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxendale C, Orwin KH, Poly F, Pommier T, Bardgett RD (2014) Are plant-soil feedback responses explained by plant traits? New Phytologist 204:408–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloor JMG, Bardgett RD (2012) Stability of above-ground and below-ground processes to extreme drought in model grassland ecosystems: interactions with plant species diversity and soil nitrogen availability. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 14:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollens U, Güsewell S, Klötzli F (2001) Vegetation changes in two Swiss fens affected by eutrophication and desiccation. Botanica Helvetica 111:121–137Google Scholar
  6. Brinson MM, Malvarez AI (2002) Temperate freshwater wetlands: types, status, and threats. Environmental Conservation 29:115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chytrý M, Tichý L, Dřevojan P, Sádlo J, Zelený D (2018) Ellenberg-type indicator values for the Czech flora. Preslia 90:83–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colmer TD (2003) Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant, Cell and Environment 26:17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cortois R, Schröder-Georgi T, Weigelt A, van der Putten WH, De Deyn GB (2016) Plant–soil feedbacks: role of plant functional group and plant traits. Journal of Ecology 104:1608–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crain CM, Bertness MD (2006) Ecosystem engineering across environmental gradients: implications for conservation and management. BioScience 56:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Deyn GB (2017) Plant life history and above–belowground interactions: missing links. Oikos 126:497–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Vries FT, Manning P, Tallowin JRB, Mortimer SR, Pilgrim ES, Harrison KA, Hobbs PJ et al (2012) Abiotic drivers and plant traits explain landscape-scale patterns in soil microbial communities. Ecology Letters 15:1230–1239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Detenbeck NE, Galatowitsch SM, Atkinson J, Ball H (1999) Evaluating perturbations and developing restoration strategies for inland wetlands in the Great Lakes basin. Wetlands 19:789–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Cabido M, Cornelissen JHC, Jalili A, Montserrat-Martí G, Grime JP, Zarrinkamer F et al (2004) The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dieleman WIJ, Vicca S, Dijkstra FA, Hagedorn F, Hovenden MJ, Larsen KS, Morgan JA, Volder A, Beier C, Dukes JS, King J, Leuzinger S, Linder S, Luo Y, Oren R, de Angelis P, Tingey D, Hoosbeek MR, Janssens IA (2012) Simple additive effects are rare: a quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO2 and temperature. Global Change Biology 18:2681–2693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dietrich L, Delzon S, Hoch G, Kahmen A (2019) No role for xylem embolism or carbohydrate shortage in temperate trees during the severe 2015 drought. Journal of Ecology 107:334–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dykyjová D, Úlehlová B (1998) Mineral economy and cycling of minerals in wetlands. In: Westlake DF, Květ J, Szczepański A (eds) The production ecology of wetlands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 319–366Google Scholar
  18. Edwards KR (2015) Effect of nutrient additions and site hydrology on belowground production and root nutrient contents in two wet grasslands. Ecological Engineering 84:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards KR, Picek T, Čížková H, Máchalová-Zemanová K, Stará A (2015) Nutrient addition effects on carbon fluxes in wet grasslands with either organic or mineral soil. Wetlands 35:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrenfeld JG, Ravit B, Elgersma K (2005) Feedback in the plant-soil system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:75–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischer FM, Wright AJ, Eisenhauer N, Ebeling A, Roscher C, Wagg C, Weigelt A, Weisser WW, Pillar VD (2016) Plant species richness and functional traits affect community stability after a flood event. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 371:20150276.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0276 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An {R} companion to applied regression, Second edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion. Accessed 26 May 2018
  23. Garssen AG, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Riis T, Raven BM, Hoffman CC, Verhoeven JTA, Soons MB (2017) Effects of increased flooding on riparian vegetation: field experiments simulating climate change along five European lowland streams. Global Change Biology 23:3052–3063PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gough L, Osenberg CW, Gross KL, Collins SL (2000) Fertilization effects on species density and primary productivity in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 89:428–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grigulis K, Lavorel S, Krainer U, Legay N, Baxendale C, Dumont M, Kastl E, Arnoldi C, Bardgett RD, Poly F, Pommier T, Schloter M, Tappeiner U, Bahn M, Clément JC (2013) Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology 101:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grime JP (1988) The C-S-R model of primary plant strategies – origins, implications and tests. In: Gottlieb LD, Jain SK (eds) Plant evolutionary biology chapman and hall. UK, London, pp 371–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Güsewell S, Bollens U, Ryser P, Klötzli F (2003) Contrasting effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and water regime on first- and second-year growth of 16 wetland plant species. Functional Ecology 17:754–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hefting M, Clément JC, Dowrick D, Cosandy AC, Bernal S, Cimpian C, Tatur A et al (2004) Water table elevation controls on soil nitrogen cycling in riparian wetlands along a European climatic gradient. Biogeochemistry 67:113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hejný S, Husák Š (1978) Higher plant communities. In: Dykyjová D, Květ J (eds) Pond littoral ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hejný S, Segal S (1998) General ecology of wetlands. In: Westlake DF, Květ J, Szczepański A (eds) The production ecology of wetlands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1–77Google Scholar
  31. Hroudová Z, Zákravský P (2002) Littoral plant communities and soils, in: Květ J, Jeník J, Soukupová L (eds.), freshwater wetlands and their sustainable future. Man and the biosphere series, v. 28, Parthenon publishing, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp.195-210Google Scholar
  32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  33. Joyce CB (2014) Ecological consequences and restoration potential of abandoned wet grasslands. Ecological Engineering 66:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Joyce CB, Wade PM (eds) (1998) European wet grasslands: biodiversity, management and restoration. John Wiley and Sons, Chicester, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Káplová M, Edwards KR, Květ J (2011) The effect of nutrient level on plant structure and production in a wet grassland: a field study. Plant Ecology 212:809–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaštovská E, Edwards K, Picek T, Šantrůčková H (2015) A larger investment into exudation by competitive versus conservative plants is connected to more coupled plant–microbe N cycling. Biogeochemistry 122:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaštovská E, Edwards K, Šantrůčková H (2017) Rhizodeposition flux of competitive versus conservative graminoid: contribution of exudates and root lysates as affected by N loading. Plant and Soil 412:331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klein T, Hoch G, Yakir D, Körner C (2014) Drought stress, growth and nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics of pine trees in a semi-arid forest. Tree Physiology 34:981–992PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Končalová H (1990) Anatomical adaptations to waterlogging in roots of wetland graminoids: limitations and drawbacks. Aquatic Botany 38:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL (1998) Plant physiological ecology, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mainiero R, Kazda M (2005) Effects of Carex rostrata on soil oxygen in relation to soil moisture. Plant and Soil 270:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McJannet CL, Keddy PA, Pick FR (1995) Nitrogen and phosphorus tissue concentrations in 41 wetland plants—a comparison across habitats and functional groups. Functional Ecology 9:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Menges ES, Waller DM (1983) Plant strategies in relation to elevation and light in floodplain herbs. The American Naturalist 122:454–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Metcalf CJE, Rees M, Alexander JM, Rose K (2006) Growth-survival trade-offs and allometries in rosette-forming perennials. Functional Ecology 20:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Middleton BA (1999) Wetland restoration, flood pulsing, and disturbance dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  46. Minden V, Kleyer M (2015) Ecosystem multifunctionality of coastal marshes is determined by key plant traits. Journal of Vegetation Science 26:651–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  48. Orwin KH, Buckland SM, Johnson D, Turnet BL, Smart S, Oakley S, Bardgett RD (2010) Linkages of plant traits to soil properties and the functioning of temperate grassland. Journal of Ecology 98:1074–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pennings SC, Clark CM, Cleland EE, Collins SL, Gough L, Gross KL, Milchunas DG, Suding KN (2005) Do individual plant species show predictable responses to nitrogen addition across multiple experiments? Oikos 110:547–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perelman SB, Burkart SE, León RJC (2003) The role of a native tussock grass (Paspalum quadrifarium lam.) in structuring plant communities in the flooding Pampa grasslands, Argentina. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pezeshki SR (2001) Wetland plant responses to soil flooding. Environmental and Experimental Botany 46:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Picek T, Kaštovská E, Edwards K, Zemanová K, Dušek J (2008) Short term effects of experimental eutrophication on carbon and nitrogen cycling in two types of wet grassland. Community Ecology 9:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2016) _nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models_. R package version 3.1–127, <URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme>. Accessed 17 April 2018
  54. Prach K (1993) Vegetational changes in a wet meadow complex, South Bohemia, Czech Republic. Folia geobotanica & phytotaxonomica 28:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Prach K (2008) Vegetation changes in a wet meadow complex during the past half-century. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica 43:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 3 March 2018
  57. Reese AT, Lulow K, David LA, Wright JP (2018) Plant community and soil conditions individually affect soil microbial community assembly in experimental mesocosms. Ecology and Evolution 8:1196–1205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saggar S, Hedley C, Mackay AD (1997) Partitioning and translocation of photosynthetically fixed 14C in grazed hill pastures. Biology and Fertility of Soils 25:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sala OE, Gherardi LA, Reichmann L, Jobbagy E, Peters D (2012) Legacies of precipitation fluctuations on primary production: theory and data synthesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 367:3135–3144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shipley B, De Bello F, Cornelissen JHC, Laliberté E, Laughlin DC, Reich PB (2016) Reinforcing loose foundation stones in trait-based plant ecology. Oecologia 180:923–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sierra CA, Trumbore SE, Davidson EA, Vicca S, Janssens I (2015) Sensitivity of decomposition rates of soil organic matter with respect to simultaneous changes in temperature and moisture. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 7:335–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. WH Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  63. Sorrell BK, Tanner CC, Sukias JPS (2002) Effects of water depth and substrate on growth and morphology of Eleocharis sphacelata: implications for culm support and internal gas transport. Aquatic Botany 73:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  65. Tallowin JRB, Jefferson RG (1999) Hay production from lowland semi-natural grasslands: a review of implications for ruminant livestock systems. Grass and Forage Science 54:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. van der Werf A, Visser AJ, Schieving F, Lambers H (1993) Evidence for optimal partitioning of biomass and nitrogen at a range of nitrogen availabilities for a fast- and slow-growing species. Functional Ecology 7:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Visser EJW, Colmer TD, Blom CWPM, Voesenek LACJ (2000) Changes in growth, porosity, and radial oxygen loss from adventitious roots of selected mono- and dicotyledonous wetland species with contrasting types of aerenchyma. Plant, Cell and Environment 23:1237–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vítková J, Dušek J, Stellner S, Moulicová L, Čížková H (2017) Effect of hummock-forming vegetation on methane emissions from a temperate sedge-grass marsh. Wetlands 37:675–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vitousek PM, D’ Antonio CM, Loope LL, Remánek M, Westbrooks R (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 21:1–16Google Scholar
  70. Wardlaw IF (1990) The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytologist 116:341–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1990) Species effects on nitrogen cycling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84:433–441PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Westlake DF (1966) The biomass and productivity of Glyceria maxima: I. Seasonal changes in biomass. Journal of Ecology 54:745–753Google Scholar
  73. White AC, Rogers A, Rees M, Osborne CP (2016) How can we make plants grow faster? A source–sink perspective on growth rate. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:31–45PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Wisheu IC, Keddy PA (1992) Competition and centrifugal organization of plant communities: theory and tests. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wu X, Liu H, Li X, Ciais P, Babst F, Guo W, Zhang C, Magliulo V, Pavelka M, Liu S, Huang Y, Wang P, Shi C, Ma Y (2018) Differentiating drought legacy effects on vegetation growth over the temperate northern hemisphere. Global Change Biology 24:504–516PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Zemanová K, Čížková H, Edwards K, Šantrůčková H (2008) Soil CO2 efflux in three wet meadow ecosystems with different C and N status. Community Ecology 9:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GN (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, NY, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations