pp 1–11 | Cite as

Effects of Nutrient-Limitation on Disturbance Recovery in Experimental Mangrove Wetlands

  • Shelby ServaisEmail author
  • John S. Kominoski
  • Stephen E. Davis
  • Evelyn E. Gaiser
  • Julio Pachόn
  • Tiffany G. Troxler
General Wetland Science


Coastal wetlands are exposed to high-energy storms that influence plant and soil structure. To understand how nutrient availability interacts with storm-induced plant stress, we tested how defoliation interacts with nutrient enrichment to affect carbon (C) and nutrient (nitrogen, N; phosphorus, P) cycling and storage within soils and plants. In outdoor experimental mesocosms, we defoliated red mangrove saplings (Rhizophora mangle), added 30 g of inorganic P to peat soils, and quantified plant [elemental stoichiometry (C:N, C:P, N:P), leaf count, and above- and below- ground biomass] and soil responses [C:N, C:P, N:P, litter breakdown rate (k), soil CO2 efflux] during a 42-d recovery period. Mangroves rapidly regrew all removed leaves and recovered nearly 30% of leaf biomass. Mangrove biomass %P increased by 50% with added P; however, soil stoichiometry remained unchanged. Defoliation reduced Soil CO2 efflux by 40% and root litter k by 30%. Phosphorus was quickly incorporated into mangrove biomass and stimulated nighttime soil CO2 efflux. This work highlights the importance of testing interactions of nutrient availability and plant stress on plant and soil biogeochemical cycling and suggests that plants quickly incorporate available nutrients into biomass and defoliation can lead to reduced soil C losses.


Peat Nutrients Coastal storms Climate change Hurricanes 



We thank S. Charles, L. Marazzi, D. Mills, B. Wilson, and L. Zhai for providing extensive feedback during the development of the manuscript. Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) award (DBI-1237517) to the Florida Coastal Everglades Long Term Ecological Research Program. We thank A. Downey-Wall, I. Giles, the Everglades Section of the South Florida Water Management District and Everglades National Park, for providing facilities and support during this research. This publication is contribution number 891 for the Southeast Environmental Research Center.

Supplementary material

13157_2018_1100_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (95 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 94 kb)
13157_2018_1100_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (89 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 89 kb)
13157_2018_1100_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (88 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 88 kb)


  1. Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby C (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  2. Alongi DM (2008) Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (1998) Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr JG, Engel V, Smith TJ, Fuentes JD (2012) Hurricane disturbance and recovery of energy balance, CO2 fluxes and canopy structure in a mangrove forest of the Florida Everglades. Agric For Meteorol 153:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benfield EF (2006) Decomposition of leaf material. Methods in Stream Ecology:711–720Google Scholar
  6. Bianchi TS, Allison MA, Zhao J, Li X, Comeaux RS, Feagin RA, Kulawardhana RW (2013) Historical reconstruction of mangrove expansion in the Gulf of Mexico: linking climate change with carbon sequestration in coastal wetlands. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 119:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloom AJ, Chapin FS III, Mooney HA (1985) Resource limitation in plants-an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:363–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boesch DF (1974) Diversity, stability and response to human disturbance in estuarine ecosystems. In Proceedings of the First International Congress of Ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen 109–114Google Scholar
  9. Boyer JN, Fourqurean JW, Jones RD (1999) Seasonal and long-term trends in the water quality of Florida bay (1989–1997). Estuaries 22:417–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castañeda-Moya E, Twilley RR, Rivera-Monroy VH, Zhang K, Davis SE, Ross M (2010) Sediment and nutrient deposition associated with hurricane Wilma in mangroves of the Florida Coastal Everglades. Estuar Coasts 33:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castañeda-Moya E, Twilley RR, Rivera-Monroy VH (2012) Allocation of biomass and net primary productivity of mangrove forests along environmental gradients in the Florida Coastal Everglades. USA Forest Ecology and Management 307:226–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chambers LG, Davis SE, Troxler T, Boyer JN, Downey-Wall A, Scinto LJ (2014) Biogeochemical effects of simulated sea level rise on carbon loss in an Everglades mangrove peat soil. Hydrobiologia 726:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen R, Twilley RR (1999a) A simulation model of organic matter and nutrient accumulation in mangrove wetland soils. Biogeochemistry 44:93–118Google Scholar
  14. Chen R, Twilley RR (1999b) Patterns of mangrove forest structure and soil nutrient dynamics along the Shark River estuary, Florida. Estuaries 22:955–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Childers DL, Boyer JN, Davis SE, Madden CJ, Rudnick DT, Sklar FH (2006) Relating precipitation and water management to nutrient concentrations in the oligotrophic" upside-down" estuaries of the Florida Everglades. Limnol Oceanogr 51:602–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Comeaux RS, Allison MA, Bianchi TS (2012) Mangrove expansion in the Gulf of Mexico with climate change: implications for wetland health and resistance to rising sea levels. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 96:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Danielson TM, Rivera-Monroy VH, Castañeda-Moya E, Briceño H, Travieso R, Marx BD, Gaiser E, Farfán LM (2017) Assessment of Everglades mangrove forest resilience: implications for above-ground net primary productivity and carbon dynamics. For Ecol Manag 404:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deng Y, Solo-Gabriele HM, Laas M, Leonard L, Childers DL, He G, Engel V (2010) Impacts of hurricanes on surface water flow within a wetland. J Hydrol 392:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dijkstra FA, Carrillo Y, Pendall E, Morgan JA (2013) Rhizosphere priming: a nutrient perspective. Front Microbiol 4:216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doyle TW, Smith TJ, Robblee MBIII (1995) Wind damage effects of hurricane Andrew on mangrove communities along the southwest coast of Florida. USA Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 21:159–168Google Scholar
  21. Duever MJ, Meeder JF, Meeder LC, McCollom JM (1994) The climate of South Florida and its role in shaping the Everglades ecosystem. In Everglades: The Ecosystem and its Restoration, ed. Davis SM, Ogden JC, 225–248Google Scholar
  22. Feller IC, Dangremond EM, Devlin DJ, Lovelock CE, Proffitt CE, Rodriguez W (2015) Nutrient enrichment intensifies hurricane impact in scrub mangrove ecosystems in the Indian River lagoon, Florida, USA. Ecology 96:2960–2972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fourqurean JW, Jones RD, Zieman JC (1993) Process influencing water column nutrient characteristics and phosphorus limitation of phytoplankton biomass in Florida bay, FL, USA: inferences from spatial distributions. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 36:295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Green AJ, Alcorlo P, Peeters ET, Morris EP, Espinar JL, Bravo-Utrera MA et al (2017) Creating a safe operating space for wetlands in a changing climate. Front Ecol Environ 15:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guitian R, Bardgett RD (2000) Plant and soil microbial responses to defoliation in temperate semi-natural grassland. Plant Soil 220:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helton AM, Ardón M, Bernhardt ES (2015) Thermodynamic constraints on the utility of ecological stoichiometry for explaining global biogeochemical patterns. Ecol Lett 18:1049–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herbert DA, Fownes JH, Vitousek PM (1999) Hurricane damage to a Hawaiian forest: nutrient supply rate affects resistance and resilience. Ecology 80:908–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howarth and Fisher (1976) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics during leaf decay in nutrient-enriched stream microecosystems. Freshw Biol 6:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jerath M, Bhat M, Rivera-Monroy VH, Castañeda-Moya E, Simard M, Twilley RR (2016) The role of economic, policy, and ecological factors in estimating the value of carbon stocks in Everglades mangrove forests, South Florida, USA. Environ Sci Pol 66:160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnstone JF, Allen CD, Franklin JF, Frelich LE, Harvey BJ, Higuera PE, Mack MC, Meentemeyer RK, Metz MR, Perry GL, Schoennagel T (2016) Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience. Front Ecol Environ 14:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kathiresan K, Bingham BL (2001) Biology of mangroves and mangrove ecosystems. Adv Mar Biol 40:81–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keuskamp JA, Hefting MM, Dingemans BJ, Verhoeven JT, Feller IC (2015) Effects of nutrient enrichment on mangrove leaf litter decomposition. Sci Total Environ 508:402–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krauss KW, Doyle TW, Twilley RR, Smith TJI (2005) Woody debris in the mangrove forests of South Florida. Biotropica 37:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuzyakov Y (2002) Factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects (review). J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:382–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lovelock CE, Ball MC, Martin KC, Feller IC (2009) Nutrient enrichment increases mortality of mangroves. PLoS One 4:5600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lovelock CE, Feller IC, Adame MFA, Reef RR, Penrose HM, Wei L, Ball MC (2011) Intense storms and the delivery of materials that relieve nutrient limitations in mangroves of an arid zone estuary. Funct Plant Biol 38:514–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lugo AE (2000) Effects and outcomes of Caribbean hurricanes in a climatic change scenario. Sci Total Environ 262:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lugo AE (2008) Visible and invisible effects of hurricanes on forest ecosystems: an international review. Austral Ecology 33:368–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lugo AE, Snedaker SC (1974) The ecology of mangroves. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:39–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Manson FJ, Loneragan NR, Skilleter GA, Phinn SR (2005) An evaluation of the evidence for linkages between mangroves and fisheries: a synthesis of the literature and identification of research directions. Oceanogr Mar Biol 43:483Google Scholar
  42. Mazda Y, Wolanski E, Ridd P (2007) The role of physical processes in mangrove environments: manual for the preservation and utilization of mangrove ecosystems. Terrapub, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  43. Michener WK, Blood ER, Bildstein KL, Brinson MM, Gardner LR (1997) Climatic change, hurricanes and tropical storms, and rising sea level in coastal wetlands. Ecol Appl 7:770–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Noe GB, Childers DL, Jones RD (2001) Phosphorus biogeochemistry and the impact of phosphorus enrichment: why is the Everglades so unique? Ecosystems 4:603–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Odum WE, Odum EP, Odum HT (1995) Nature’s pulsing paradigm. Estuaries 18:547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piou C, Feller IC, Berger U, Chi F (2006) Zonation patterns of Belizean offshore mangrove forests 41 years after a catastrophic hurricane. Biotropica 38:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In: R Foundation for statistical computing. Austria. URL, Vienna Google Scholar
  48. Reef R, Feller IC, Lovelock CE (2010) Nutrition of mangroves. Tree Physiol 30(9):1148–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson CT, Gessner MO (2000) Nutrient addition accelerates leaf breakdown in alpine Springbrook. Oceologica 122:258–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saenger P (2002) Mangrove ecology, silviculture and conservation. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  51. Schachtman DP, Reid RJ, Ayling SM (1998) Phosphorus uptake by plants: from soil to cell. Plant Physiol 116:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sherman RE, Fahey TJ, Martinez P (2001) Hurricane impacts on a mangrove forest in the Dominican Republic: damage patterns and early recovery. Biotropica 33:393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith TJ III, Robblee MB, Wanless HR, Doyle TW (1994) Mangroves, hurricanes, and lightning strikes. BioScience 44:256–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith TJ III, Anderson GH, Balentine K, Tilling G, Ward GA, Whelan KRT (2009) Cumulative impacts of hurricanes on Florida mangrove ecosystems: sediment deposition, storm surges and vegetation. Wetlands 29:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Twilley RR (1995) Properties of mangrove ecosystems related to the energy signature of coastal environments. In ‘Maximum Power: The Ideas and Applications of HT Odum’ (Ed. CAS Hall.) 43–62Google Scholar
  56. Vančura V, Staněk M (1975) Root exudates of plants. Plant Soil 43:547–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. White PS, Jentsch A (2001) The search for generality in studies of disturbance and ecosystem dynamics. In Progress in Botany (pp. 399–450). Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang K, Simard M, Ross M, Rivera-Monroy VH, Houle P, Ruiz P, Twilley RR, Whelan K (2008) Airborne laser scanning quantification of disturbances from hurricanes and lightning strikes to mangrove forests in Everglades National Park, USA. Sensors 8:2262–2292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang K, Liu H, Li Y, Xu H, Shen J, Rhome J, Smith TJ III (2012) The role of mangroves in attenuating storm surges. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 102-103:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and Southeast Environmental Research CenterFlorida International UniversityFloridaUSA
  2. 2.Everglades FoundationFloridaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Soil and Water ScienceUniversity of FloridaFloridaUSA

Personalised recommendations