, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 79–85 | Cite as

Nitrogen Retention by Sphagnum fuscum in Laboratory Mesocosms: Responses to Experimentally Added NH4+-N and NO3-N

  • Jeremy A. HartsockEmail author
  • R. Kelman Wieder
  • Melanie A. Vile
General Wetland Science


To evaluate the effects of increasing atmospheric N deposition on net C and N accumulation in Sphagnum-dominated bogs, we conducted a laboratory mesocosm experiment. Following 45 days of watering with N-free rainwater, mesocosms were exposed to simulated atmospheric N deposition values of 0, 4.14, 8.18, and 12.42 mg N m−2 da−1 over a 108 day period. We quantified N retention from leachate N concentrations and from changes in N contents of the Sphagnum/peat mesocosms. As N loading of simulated atmospheric N deposition increased, so did the net retention of simulated atmospherically deposited N. Our hypothesis of a decrease in N retention efficiency with increasing N loading was not observed. Further, for each N loading treatment, rates of retention of simulated atmospherically deposited N remained constant over time. We did not observe a threshold N deposition below which N would be retained in mesocosms and above which N passed through the mesocosms. Substantially more N was retained in mesocosms that was added in simulated atmospheric N deposition, suggesting an unaccounted for N source, most likely biological N2 fixation. In locations where N2 fixation represents a much greater source of new N to Sphagnum-dominated bogs, as in northern Alberta, Canada, increasing atmospheric N deposition may have a minimal effect on overall net N accumulation in peat.


Peatlands Sphagnum Nitrogen Deposition Ammonium Nitrate 



Special thanks to Kimberli Scott, Cara Albright, Jim Quinn, and Andrew Rudner for assisting in all aspects of this laboratory study. Funding for the project was provided by a grant awarded to Drs. R. Kelman Wieder, Melanie Vile, and Dale Vitt from the Cumulative Environmental Management Association (grant no. 224940).


  1. Ackermann K, Zackrisson O, Rousk J, Jones DL, DeLuca TH (2012) N2 fixation in feather mosses is a sensitive indicator of N deposition in boreal forests. Ecosystems 15:986–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayley SE, Thormann MN, Szumigalski AR (2005) Nitrogen mineralization and decomposition in western boreal bog and fen peat. Écoscience 12:455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonnett SAF, Ostle N, Freeman C (2010) Short-term effect of deep shade and enhanced nitrogen supply on Sphagnum capillifolium morphophysiology. Plant Ecology 207:347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bragazza L, Limpens J (2004) Dissolved organic nitrogen dominates in European bogs under increasing atmospheric N deposition. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 18:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bragazza L, Tahvanainen T, Kutnar T, Rydin H, Limpens J, Hájek M, Grosvernier P, Hájek T, Hajkiva O, Hansen I, Iacumin O, Gerdol R (2004) Nutritional constraints in ombrotrophic Sphagnum plants under increasing atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Europe. Global Change Biology 7:591–598Google Scholar
  6. Bragazza L, Limpens J, Gerdol R, Grosvernier P, Hájek M, Hájek T, Hajkova P, Hansen I, Iacumin P, Kutnar L, Rydin H, Tahvanainen T (2005) Nitrogen concentration and δ15N signature of ombrotrophic Sphagnum mosses at different N deposition levels in Europe. Global Change Biology 11:106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bubier JL, Moore TR, Bledzki LA (2007) Effects of nutrient addition on vegetation and carbon cycling in an ombrotrophic bog. Global Change Biology 13:1168–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Francez A-J, Gogo S, Josselin N (2000) Distribution of potential CO2 and CH4 productions, denitrification and microbial biomass C and N in the profile of a restored peatland in Brittany (France). European Journal of Soil Science 36:161–168Google Scholar
  9. Fritz C, Lamers LPM, Riaz M, van den Berg LJL, Elzenga T (2014) Sphagnum mosses - masters of efficient N-uptake while avoiding intoxication. PLoS ONE 9:11Google Scholar
  10. Gorham E (1991) Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecological Applications 1:182–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham JA, Hartsock JA, Vitt DH, Wieder RK, Gibson JJ (2016) Linkages between spatio-temporal patterns of environmental factors and distribution of plant assemblages across a boreal peatland complex. Boreas 45:207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gundale MJ, Deluca TH, Nordin A (2011) Bryophytes attenuate anthropogenic inputs in boreal forests. Global Change Biology 17:2743–2753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartsock J, House M, Vitt D (2016) Net nitrogen mineralization in boreal fens: a potential performance indicator for peatland reclamation. Botany 94:1027–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayden MJ, Ross DS (2005) Denitrification as a nitrogen removal mechanism in a Vermont peatland. Journal of Environmental Quality 34:2052–2061CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiroušek M, Hájek T, Bragazza L (2011) Nutrient stoichiometry in Sphagnum along a nitrogen deposition gradient in highly polluted region of central-East Europe. Environmental Pollution 159:585–590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller JK, Bridgham SD (2007) Pathways of anaerobic carbon cycling across an ombrotrophic-minerotrophic peatland gradient. Limnology and Oceanography 52:96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kox MAR, Lüke C, Fritz C, van den Elzen E, van Alen T, Op den Camp HJM, Lamers PM, Jetten MSM, Ettwig KF (2016) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on diazotrophic activity of microorganisms associated with Sphagnum magellanicum. Plant and Soil 406:83–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kravchenko AN, Toosi ER, Guber AK, Ostrom NE, Yu J, Azeem K, Rivers ML, Robertson GP (2017) Hotspots of soil N2O emission enhanced through water absorption by plant residue. Nature Geoscience 10:496–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamers LPM, Bobbink R, Roelofs JGM (2000) Natural nitrogen filter fails in polluted raised bogs. Global Change Biology 6:583–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Limpens J, Berendse F, Klees H (2003) N deposition affects N availability in interstitial water, growth of Sphagnum and invasion of vascular plants in bog vegetation. The New Phytologist 157:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Limpens J, Heijmans MMPD, Berendse F (2006) The nitrogen cycle in boreal peatlands, In: Wieder RK, Vitt DH (eds) Boreal peatland ecosystems. Springer, pp 195–230Google Scholar
  22. Limpens J, Granath G, Gunnarsson U, Aerts R, Bayley S, Bragazza L, Bubier J, Buttler A, van den Berg LJL, Francez A-J, Gerdol R, Grosvernier P, Heijmans MMPD, Hoosbeek MR, Hotes S, Ilomets M, Leith I, Mitchell EAD, Moore T, Nilsson MB, Nordbakken J-F, Rochefort L, Rydin H, Sheppard LJ, Thormann M, Wiedermann MM, Williams BL, Xu B (2011) Climatic modifiers of the response to nitrogen deposition in peat-forming Sphagnum mosses: a meta-analysis. The New Phytologist 191:496–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Loisel J, Yu ZC, Beilman DW, Camill P, Alm J, Amesbury MJ, Anderson D, Andersson S, Bochicchio C, Barber K, Belyea LR, Bunbury J, Chambers FM, Charman DJ, De Vleeschouwer F, Fialkiewicz-Koziel B, Finkelstein SA, Galka M, Garneau M, Hammarlund D, Hinchcliffe W, Holmquist J, Hughes P, Jones MC, Klein ES, Kokfelt U, Korhola A, Kuhry P, Lamarre A, Lamentowicz M, Large D, Lavoie M, MacDonald G, Magnan G, Makila M, Mallon G, Mathijssen P, Mauquoy D, McCarroll J, Moore TR, Nichols J, O'Reilly B, Oksanen P, Packalen M, Peteet D, Richard PJH, Robinson S, Ronkainen T, Rundgren M, Sannel ABK, Tarnocai C, Thom T, Tuittila ES, Turetsky M, Valiranta M, van der Linden M, van Geel B, van Bellen S, Vitt D, Zhao Y, Zhou WJ (2014) A database and synthesis of northern peatland soil properties and Holocene carbon and nitrogen accumulation. The Holocene 24:1028–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Macrae ML, Devito KJ, Strack M, Waddington JM (2013) Effect of water table drawdown on peatland nutrient dynamics: implications for climate change. Biogeochemistry 112:661–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore T, Blodau C, Turunen J, Roulet N, Richard PJH (2004) Patterns of nitrogen and sulfur accumulation and retention in ombrotrophic bogs, eastern Canada. Global Change Biology 11:356–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nykänen H, Vasander Hm Huttunen JT, Martikainen PJ (2002) Effect of experimental nitrogen load on methane and nitrous oxide fluxes on ombrotrophic boreal peatland. Plant and Soil 242:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rousk K, Jones DL, DeLuca TH (2014) Exposure to nitrogen does not eliminate N2 fixation in the feather moss Pleurozium schreberi (Brid.) Mitt. Plant and Soil 374:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stuart JEM, Wieder RK, Vile MA (2018) Net nitrogen mineralization in Alberta bog peat is insensitive to experimentally increased nitrogen deposition and time since wildfire. Biogeochemistry 138:155–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Urban NR, Eisenreich SJ, Bayley SE (1988) The relative importance of denitrification and nitrate assimilation in midcontinental bogs. Limnology and Oceanography 33:1611–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vile MA, Wieder RK, Zivkovic T, Scott KD, Vitt DH, Hartsock JA, Iosue CL, Quinn JC, Petix M, Fillingim HM, Popma JMA, Dynarski KA, Jackman TR, Albright CM, Wykoff DD (2014) N2-fixation by methanotrophs sustains carbon and nitrogen accumulation in pristine peatlands. Biogeochemistry 121:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vitt DH, Wieder K, Halsey LA, Turetsky M (2003) Response of Sphagnum fuscum to nitrogen deposition: a case study of ombrogenous peatlands in Alberta, Canada. Bryologist 106:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wieder RK, Scott KD, Kamminga K, Vile MA, Vitt DH, Bone T, Xu B, Benscoter BW, Bhatti JS (2009) Postfire carbon balance in boreal bogs of Alberta, Canada. Global Change Biology 15:63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wieder RK, Vitt DH, Burke-Scoll M, Scott KD, House M, Vile MA (2010) Nitrogen and sulphur deposition and the growth of Sphagnum fuscum in bogs of the Athabasca Oil Sands region, Alberta. Journal of Limnology 69:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wieder RK, Vile MA, Albright CA, Scott KD, Vitt DH, Quinn JC, Burke-Scoll M (2016a) Effects of altered atmospheric nutrient deposition from Alberta oil sands development on Sphagnum fuscum growth and C, N, and S accumulation in peat. Biogeochemistry 129:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wieder RK, Vile MA, Scott KD, Albright CM, McMillen K, Vitt DH, Fenn ME (2016b) Differential effects of high atmospheric N and S deposition on bog plant/lichen tissue and porewater chemistry across the Athabasca Oil Sands region. Environmental Science & Technology 50:12630–12640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood ME, Macrae ML, Strack M, Price JS, Osko TJ, Petrone RM (2015) Spatial variation in nutrient dynamics among five different peatland types in the Alberta oil sands region. Ecohydrology 9:688–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu ZC, Loisel J, Brosseau DP, Beilman DW, Hunt SJ (2010) Global peatland dynamics since the last glacial maximum. Geophysical Research Letters 37:L13402. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant BiologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and TechnologyAthabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada
  4. 4.Department of Geography and the EnvironmentVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations