The Role of Propagule Type, Resource Availability, and Seed Source in Phragmites Invasion in Chesapeake Bay Wetlands
The relative importance of sexual vs. asexual propagules in wetland plant invasions is poorly understood, particularly for their importance in increasingly disturbed, resource-rich environments. Using the invasive wetland grass Phragmites australis as a model, we evaluated the resource needs of its seeds and rhizome fragments. In a greenhouse experiment where we manipulated nitrogen and propagule type, we found that Phragmites seedlings, but not rhizome fragments, responded positively to nutrient enrichment. In a second experiment, where we focused on seedling resource needs and manipulated light, nitrogen, and seed source, we found that seedlings were inhibited by heavy shade with no additional benefit of nutrient additions. Different seed sources (wetlands surrounded by different dominant land-use types, a proxy for disturbance) had variable leaf production and stem height (biomass did not vary). Understanding the mechanisms of Phragmites recruitment via seeds and rhizomes is critical for informing how a clonal species—now understood to disperse largely by seeds—can invade increasingly disturbed, resource-rich habitats. Our study suggests that Phragmites invasion by seed is being fueled, in part, by the positive effects of increased nutrients and light on Phragmites seedling performance and potentially by varying performance of seedlings derived from different watersheds.
KeywordsClonality Disturbance dynamics Phragmites australis Recruitment limitation Rhizomes Seedlings
We thank Jay O’Neill, Mike Taylor, Melissa McCormick, and Lori Davias Maloney for assistance in the field and/or greenhouse. Susan Durham provided statistical advice. We thank Melissa McCormick for her review of an earlier version of this manuscript. This research was funded by Environmental Protection Agency STAR grant # 692105 to D. Wardrop and a Smithsonian Postdoctoral Fellowship and award NA09NOS4780214 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research (CSCOR) to KK.
- Eller F, Skálová H, Caplan JS, Bhattarai GP, Burger MK, Cronin JT, Guo WY, Guo X, Hazelton EL, Kettenring KM, Lambertini C, McCormick MK, Meyerson LA, Mozdzer TJ, Pysek P, Sorrell BK, Whigham DF, Brix H (2017) Cosmopolitan species as models for ecophysiological responses to global change: the common reed Phragmites australis. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kettenring KM, de Blois S, Hauber DP (2012) Moving from a regional to a continental perspective of Phragmites australis invasion in North America. AoB plants, 2012:pls040Google Scholar
- Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL (2008) Seedling ecology and evolution. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Meyerson LA, Cronin JT (2013) Evidence for multiple introductions of Phragmites australis to North America: detection of a new non-native haplotype. Biological Invasions 15:2605–2608Google Scholar
- Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2008) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W (eds) Biological invasions. Ecological studies (Analysis and synthesis), vol 193. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 97–125Google Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc. (2016) JMP© 130.0Google Scholar
- Vasquez EA, Glenn EP, Guntenspergen GR, Brown JJ, Nelson SG (2006) Salt tolerance and osmotic adjustment of Spartina alterniflora (Poaceae) and the invasive M haplotype of Phragmites australis (Poaceae) along a salinity gradient. American Journal of Botany 93:1784–1790Google Scholar