Spartina patens Productivity and Soil Organic Matter Response to Sedimentation and Nutrient Enrichment
Many coastal wetlands are subject to the combined effects of reduced sediment input and increased nutrient loads from watersheds. Restoration strategies focused on increasing marsh elevation and acreage can involve adding sediment through dredge sediment deposition or diversion of river water. It is unclear, however, how sediment inputs influence plant productivity in areas also receiving high nutrient loads. We tested the hypothesis that productivity of Spartina patens is greater with both nutrient and sediment addition than either or neither in a greenhouse experiment. Soil organic matter and nitrogen concentrations were predicted to increase with nutrient addition, but decrease with sediment addition. Plants experienced one of two levels of sediment deposition (control and 4 applications of 2 cm river silt) within either nutrient-enriched (6.96 N, 1.82 P, 1.82 K mg/L) or control tanks. Spartina patens exhibited nearly double the height, stem density, and aboveground biomass in nutrient treatments as compared to controls. Belowground biomass was also stimulated by nutrient-enrichment. Sedimentation reduced the emergence of new stems, but increased fine root biomass. Nutrient enrichment further stimulated root and rhizome growth into added surface sediment. Despite a large plant response to added nutrients, soil properties were unaffected by nutrient-enrichment.
KeywordsSalt marsh Greenhouse Belowground biomass Nitrogen Louisiana Sedimentation River diversions
We would like to thank Callie Sno, Robert Denoux, Kyle Candilora, Victoria Primeaux, Noelle Primeaux, Madeline Conrad, Dalton Guidry, Garin Matzke, Allie Beyer, Maria Bilello, Andy Muench, and William Quirk for help in the field and in the greenhouse. LSU greenhouse staff, Claudette Oster and Bill Salzer provided assistance with greenhouse maintenance. We would like to thank Bayou Savage Wildlife Refuge for access to field sites. Financial support for this research was provided by the Louisiana Sea Grant College Program through its Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP). Two anonymous reviewers gave helpful commentary and recommendations.
- Callaway JC, DeLaune RD, Patrick WH Jr (1997) Sediment accretion rates from four coastal wetlands along the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Coastal Research 13:181–1997Google Scholar
- Couvillion BR, Barras JA, Steyer GD, Sleavin W, Fischer M, Beck H, Trahan N, Griffin B, Heckman D (2011) Land area change in coastal Louisiana from 1932 to 2010: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3164, scale 1:265,000, p. 12. pamphletGoogle Scholar
- Day JW, Kemp GP, Reed DJ, Cahoon DR, Boumans RM, Suhayda JM, Gambrell R (2011) Vegetation death and rapid loss of surface elevation in two contrasting Mississippi delta marshes: the role of sedimentation, autocompaction, and sea-level rise. Ecological Engineerig 37:29–240Google Scholar
- DeLaune RD, Pezeshki SR, Pardue JH, Whitcomb JH, Patrick WH Jr (1990) Some influences of sediment addition to a deteriorating salt marsh in the Mississippi River deltaic plain: a pilot study. Journal of Coastal Research 6:181–188Google Scholar
- Friedrichs CT, Perry JE (2001) Tidal salt marsh morphodynamics: a synthesis. Journal of Coastal Research, SI 27:7–37Google Scholar
- Long SP, Mason CF (1983) Saltmarsh ecology Balackie & Son Ltd, Glasgow, p125Google Scholar
- Reimold RJ, Hardisky MA, Adams PC (1978) The effects of smothering a Spartina alterniflora salt marsh with dredged material US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC Technical Report D-78-38Google Scholar
- Rybczyk JM, Garson G, Day JW Jr (1996) Nutrient enrichment and decomposition in wetland ecosystems: models, analyses, and effects. Current Topics in Wetland Biogeochemistry 2:52–72Google Scholar
- Snedden GA, Cretini K, Patton B (2015) Inundation and salinity impacts to above- and belowground productivity in Spartina patens and Spartina alterniflora in the Mississippi River deltaic plain: implications for using river diversions as restoration tools. Ecological Engineering 81:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turner RE, Swenson EM, Milan CS (2000) Organic and inorganic contribution to vertical accretion in salt marsh sediments. In: Weinstein MP, Kreeger DA (eds) Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 583–595Google Scholar