, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 855–859 | Cite as

Effects of Sediment Application on Nyssa aquatica and Taxodium distichum Saplings

  • Isabel GrandyEmail author
  • Linda Messina
  • Evelyn Anemaet
  • Beth A. Middleton
Short Communication


The decline of Taxodium distichum forests along the Gulf Coast of North America is partly due to elevation loss and subsequent flooding. In many coastal wetlands, a common approach for coastal restoration is to rebuild elevation through the application of dredge material, but this technique has not been used widely in coastal forests due to concerns of negatively impacting trees. This experiment explored growth responses of Nyssa aquatica and T. distichum saplings to applications of low salinity dredge material (0.08 ± 0.001 ppt) in a greenhouse setting. Compared to controls, saplings of T. distichum grown in 7 and 15 cm sediment depths had greater final height, and increased stem and total biomass. In contrast, N. aquatica did not respond to sediment application. The absence of a negative response to sediment application in these two species indicates that dredge material application has the potential to improve the ecosystem health of sinking swamp forests by raising their elevation. We recommend that field trials applying sediment additions in coastal forests include careful monitoring of ecosystem responses, including seed bank expression, seedling regeneration, and root and canopy production.


Sediment application Subsidence Wetland loss 



Thanks to Aaron Muirhead for assistance with the project and Mr. Josh Pruett of Geoengineers Incorporated for dredge sediment material used in the experiment. Also thanks to Rebecca Howard and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest with any data or information provided in this manuscript.


  1. Cahoon DR, Cowan JH Jr (1988) Environmental impacts and regulatory policy implications of spray disposal of dredged material in Louisiana wetlands. Coastal Management 16:341−362Google Scholar
  2. Cavalcanti GG, Lockaby BG (2005) Effects of sediment deposition on fine root dynamics in riparian forests. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:729–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers JL, Conner WH, Day JW, Faulkner SP, Gardiner ES, Hughes MS, Keim RF, King SL, McLeod KW, Miller CA, Nyman J, Shaffer GP (2005) Conservation, protection and utilization of Louisiana’s coastal wetland forests. Final report to the governor of Louisiana from the coastal wetland Forest conservation and use science working group. Baton Rouge, LAGoogle Scholar
  4. Color M (2011) Munsell color chart for plant tissues. Munsell Color, Grand RapidsGoogle Scholar
  5. Conner WH, Brody M (1989) Rising water levels and the future of southeastern Louisiana swamp forests. Estuaries 12:318–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Day JW, Christian RR, Boesch DM, Yáñez-Arancibia A, Morris J, Twilley RR, Naylor L, Schaffner L, Stevenson C (2008) Consequences of climate change on the ecogeomorphology of coastal wetlands. Estuaries and Coasts 31:477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ford MA, Cahoon DR, Lynch JC (1999) Restoring marsh elevation in a rapidly subsiding salt marsh by thin-layer deposition of dredged material. Ecological Engineering 12:189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibbs S (2000) How to texture soils and test for salinity. Salinity notes 8: October 2000, salt action, new South Wales agriculture, government of Australia. ISSN 1 325−444. Available at le/0008/168866/texture-salinity.pdf [Accessed 15 Jul 2015]
  9. Gillies J (2013) Louisiana’s swamp forests are sinking. Can dredge spoils stop them? (April 4, 2013)
  10. Jiang M, Middleton BA (2011) Soil characteristics of sediment-amended baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) swamps of coastal Louisiana. Wetlands 31:735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. JMP SAS (2016) Statistical Analysis System, 13.1.0. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  12. Krauss KW, Duberstein JA, Doyle TW, Conner WH, Day RH, Inabinette LW, Whitbeck JL (2009) Site condition, structure, and growth of baldcypress along tidal/non-tidal salinity gradients. Wetlands 29:505–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Langley JA, McKee KL, Cahoon DR, Cherry JA, Megonigal JP (2010) Elevated CO2 stimulates marsh elevation gain, counterbalancing sea-level rise. PNAS 106:6182–6186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee I, Park S, Ryu S, Kobayashi N (2011) Ecological restoration index for evaluation of artificial salt marsh. Journal of Coastal Research 27:959–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mendelssohn IA, Kuhn NL (2003) Sediment subsidy: effects on soil–plant responses in a rapidly submerging coastal salt marsh. Ecological Engineering 21:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Middleton BA, Jiang M (2013) Use of sediment amendments to rehabilitate sinking coastal swamp forests in Louisiana. Ecological Engineering 54:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Turner RE, Streever B (2002) Approaches to coastal wetland restoration: northern Gulf of Mexico. SPB Academic Publishing, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Yuill B, Lavoie D, Reed DJ (2009) Understanding subsidence processes in coastal Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research 54:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Joseph’s AcademyBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations