Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 627–640 | Cite as

Soil Methane Production, Anaerobic and Aerobic Oxidation in Porewater of Wetland Soils of the Minjiang River Estuarine, China

  • W. WangEmail author
  • C. Zeng
  • J. Sardans
  • C. Wang
  • C. Tong
  • J. Peñuelas
Original Research

Abstract

Wetlands are important sources of methane emission. Anaerobic oxidation, aerobic oxidation and production of methane as well as dissolved methane are important processes of methane metabolism. We studied methane metabolism and the soil influencing factors. Potential soil methane production, anaerobic oxidation and aerobic oxidation rates, and dissolved methane in soil porewater changed seasonally and the annual average was 21.1 ± 5.1 μg g−1d−1, 11.0 ± 3.9 μg g−1d−1, 20.9 ± 5.8 μg g−1d−1, and 62.9 ± 20.6 μmol l−1, respectively. Potential soil methane production and anaerobic and aerobic oxidation were positively correlated among themselves and with soil pH and negatively correlated with soil redox potential (Eh). Potential soil methane production and aerobic and anaerobic oxidation rates were negatively related to pore soil methane concentration. Thus, the more water-saturated the soil (the lower Eh), the higher its capacity to produce methane. The potential soil capacity for methane oxidation was higher both in the same anaerobic circumstances and when the soil was suddenly subjected to aerobic conditions. The results of this study suggested a buffer effect in the methane balance in wetland areas. The environmental circumstances favoring methane production are also favorable for anaerobic methane oxidation.

Keywords

Methane production Methane anaerobic oxidation Methane aerobic oxidation Dissolved methane Minjiang River estuarine wetland 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Hongchang Ren, Xuming Wang and Dongping Zeng for their assistance in field sampling and laboratory analysis. Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation of China (41571287, 31000209), Natural Science Foundation Key Programs of Fujian Province (2018R1101006-1), Fujian Provincial Outstanding Young Scientists Program (2017), the European Research Council Synergy grant ERC-SyG-2013-610028 IMBALANCE-P, the Spanish Government grant CGL2016-79835-P and the Catalan Government grant SGR 2014-274.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

13157_2018_1006_MOESM1_ESM.docx (120 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 120 kb)

References

  1. Alperin MJ, Hoehler TM (2009) Anaerobic methane oxidation by archaea/sulfate-reducing bacteria aggregates: 1. Thermodynamic and physical constraints. American Journal of Science 309:869–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton K (2012) MuM. In: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.7.2. https://CRAN. R-283 project.org/package=MuMIn. at https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn>
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman I, Klarqvist M, Nilsson M (2000) Seasonal variation in rates of methane production from peat of various botanical origins: effects of temperature and substrate quality. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 33:181–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blazewicz S, Petersen DG, Waldrop MP, Firestone MK (2012) Anaerobic oxidation of methane in tropical and boreal soils: ecological significance in terrestrial methane cycling. Journal of Geophysical Research 117:G02033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown BG, Humpherys ER, Moore TR, Roulet NT, Lefleur PM (2014) Evidence for a nonmonotonic relationships between ecosystem-scale peatland methane emissions and water table depth. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 119:826–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckley DH, Baumgartner LK, Visscher PT (2008) Vertical distribution of methane metabolism in microbial mats of the great Sippewissett salt marsh. Environmental Microbiology 10:967–977CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot RD, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dasselaar AP, Beusichen ML, Oenema O (1998) Effects of soil moisture content and temperature on methane uptake by grasslands on sandy soils. Plant Soil 204:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Datta A, Yeluripati JB, Nayak DR, Mahata KR, Santra SC, Adhya TK (2013) Seasonal variation of methane flux from coastal saline rice field with the application of different organic manures. Atmospheric Environment 66:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding WX, Cai ZC, Tsuruta H, Li XP (2003) Key factors affecting spatial variation of methane emissions from freshwater marshes. Chemosphere 51:167–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Eller G, Kanel L, Kruger M (2005) Cooccurrence of aerobic and anaerobic methane oxidation in the water column of Lake Plubsee. Applied environment. Microbiology 71:8925–8928Google Scholar
  13. Ettwig KF, Bulter MK, Paslier DL et al (2010) Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature 464:543–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodrich JP, Campbell DI, Roulet NT, Clearwater MJ (2015) Overriding control of methane flux temporal variability by water table dynamics in a southern hemisphere, raised bog. Journal of Geophysical Research 120:819–831Google Scholar
  15. Hoehler TM, Alperin MJ, Albert DB et al (1994) Field and laboratory studies of methane oxidation in an anoxic marine sediment-evidence for a methanogen-sulfate reducer consortium. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 8:451–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2014) In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Intergovernmental panel on climate change, IPCC, 2014. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1435Google Scholar
  17. Joye SB, Samarkin VA (2009) Metabolic variability in seafloor brines revealed by carbon and sulphur dynamics. Nature Geoscience 2:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Juutinen S, Alm J, Larmola T, Huttunen JT, Moreno M, Saarnio S, Martikainen PJ, Silvola J (2003) Methane (CH4) reléase from litoral wetlands of boreal lakes during an extended flooding period. Global Change Biology 9:413–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kettunen A, Kaitala V, Lehtinen A, Lohila A, Alm J, Silvola J, Martikainen PJ (1999) Methane production and oxidation potentials in relation to water table fluctuations in two boreal mires. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31:1741–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kniemeyer O, Musat F, Sievert SM et al (2007) Anaerobic oxidation of short-chain hydrocarbons by marine sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature 449:898–901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Knorr KH, Oosterwoud MR, Blodau C (2008) Experimental drought alters rates of soil respiration and methanogenesis but not carbon exchange in soil of a temperate fen. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40:1781–1791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krüger M, Eller G, Conrad R et al (2002) Seasonal variations in CH4 oxidation and pathways of CH4 production in rice fields determined by stable carbon isotopes and specific inhibitors. Global Change Biology 8:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laanbroek HJ (2010) Methane emission from nature wetland: interplay between emergent macrophytes and soil microbial process. Annals of Botany 105:141–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Le Mer J, Roger P (2001) Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. European Journal of Soil Biology 37:25–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu JQ, Zeng CS, Chen N (2006) Research of Minjiang River estuary wetland. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  26. Lloyd KG, Alperin MJ, Teske A (2011) Environmental evidence for net methane production and oxidation in putative anaerobic methanotrophic (ANME) archaea. Environmental Microbiology 13:2548–2564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Moran JJ, House CH, Freeman KH et al (2005) Trace methane oxidation studied in several Euryarchaeota under diverse conditions. Archaea 1:303–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Moran JJ, Beal EJ, Vrentas JM et al (2008) Methyl sulfides as intermediates in the anaerobic oxidation of methane. Environmental Microbiology 10:162–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Müller V, Blaut M, Gottschalk G (1993) Bioenergetics of methanogenesis. In: Ferry JG (ed) Methanogenesis: ecology, physiology, biochenistry, and genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 360–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nauhaus K, Boetius A, Krüger M, Widdel F (2002) In vitro demonstration of anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to sulphate reduction in sediment from a marine gas hydrate area. Environmental Microbiology 4:296–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nesbit SP, Breitenbeck GA (1992) A laboratory study of factors influencing methane uptake by soils. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 41:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neubauer SC, Toledo-Duran GE, Emerson D (2007) Returning to their roots: iron-oxidizing bacteria enhance short-term plaque formation in the wetland-plant rhizosphere. Geomicrobiology Journal 24:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Orcutt B, Boetius A, Elvert M, Samarkin V, Joye SB (2005) Molecular biogeochemistry of sulfate reduction, methanogenesis and the anaerobic oxidation of methane at Gulf of Mexico cold seeps. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 69:4267–4281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Core TR (2016) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3:1–126 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
  35. Raghoebarsing AA, Pol A, van des Pas-Schoonen KT, AJP S, Ettwig KF, WIC R, Schouten S, JSS D, den Camp HJMO, MSM J, Strous M (2006) A microbial consortium couples anaerobic methane oxidation to denitrification. Nature 440:918–921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ro S, Seanjan P, Tulaphitak T (2011) Sulfate content influencing methane production and emission from incubated soil and rice-planted soil in Northeast Thailand. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 57:833–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts HH, Aharon P (1994) Hydrocarbon-derived carbonate buildups of the northern Gulf of Mexico continental slope: a review of submersible investigations. Geo-Marine Letters 14:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saarnio S, Alm J, Silvola J, Lohila A, Nykanen H, Martikainen PJ (1997) Seasonal variation in CH4 emissions and production and oxidation potentials at microsites on an oligotrophic pine fen. Oecologia 110:414–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Simas T, Nunes JP, Ferreria JG (2001) Effects of global climate change on coastal salt marshes. Ecological Modelling 139:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh JS (2011) Methanotrophs: the potential biological sink to mitigate the global methane load. Current Science 100:29–30Google Scholar
  41. Siniscalchi LAB, Babelo Leite L, Oliveira G, Chernicharo CAL, Calabria de Araújo J (2017) Illumina sequencing-based analysis of a microbial community enriched under anaerobic methane oxidation condition coupled to denitrification revealed coexistence of aerobic and anaerobic methanotrophs. Environmental Science Pollution Research 24:16751–16764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Smemo KA, Yavitt JB (2007) Evidence for anaerobic CH4 oxidation in freshwater peatlands. Geomicrobiology Journal 24:583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smemo KA, Yavitt JB (2011) Anaerobic oxidation of methane: an underappreciated aspect of methane cycling in peatland ecosystems? Biogeosciences 8:779–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Song CC, Zhang JB, Wang YY, Wang YS, Zhao ZC (2008) Emission of CO2, CH4 and N2O from freshwater marsh in north of China. Journal of Environmental Management 88:428–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Supparattanapan S, Saenjan P, Quantin C et al (2009) Salinity and organic amendment effects on methane emission from a rain-fed saline paddy field. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 55:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Treude T, Krüger M, Boetius A, Jorgensen AB (2005) Environmental control on anaerobic oxidation of methane in the gassy sediments of Eckernförde Bay (German Baltic). Limnology and Oceanography 50:1771–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van der Gon DHAC, Neue HU (1995) Influence of organic matter incorporation on methane emission from wetland rice field. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 9:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wagner D, Pfeiffer EM (1997) Two temperature optima of methane production in a typical soil of the Elbe river marshland. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 22:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang WQ, Tong C, Zeng CS (2010) Stoichiometry characteristics of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and anaerobic carbon decomposition of wetland soil of different texture. China Environment Sciences 30:1369–1374Google Scholar
  50. Wang WQ, Li PF, Zeng CS, Tong C (2012) Evaluation of silicate iron slag as a potential methane mitigating method. Advances in Materials Research 468:1626–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang C, Lai DYF, Sardans J, Wang W, Zeng C, Peñuelas J (2017) Factors related with CH4 and N2O emissions from a Paddy field: clues for management implications. PLoS One 12:e0169254CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Wassmann R, Neue HU, Bueno C, Lantin RS, Alberto MCR, Buendia LV, Bronson K, Papen H, Rennenberg H (1998) Methane production capacities of different rice soil derived from inherent and exogenous substrates. Plant Soil 203:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wrede C, Brady S, Rockstroh S et al (2012) Aerobic and anaerobic methane oxidation in terrestrial mud volcanoes in the northern Apennines. Sedimentary Geology 263:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yagi K, Minami K (1990) Effect of organic matter applications on methane emission from some Japanese paddy fields. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 36:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zheng CH, Zeng CS, Chen ZQ, Lin MC (2006) A study on the changes of landscape pattern of estuary wetlands of the Minjiang River. Wetland Science 4:29–34Google Scholar
  56. Zhou LJ, Tu YY, Song YC (2006) The biodiversity of wetland and its prevention measures in Min River estuary. Ecological Science 25:330–334Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • C. Zeng
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Sardans
    • 3
    • 4
  • C. Wang
    • 1
  • C. Tong
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Peñuelas
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of GeographyFujian Normal UniversityFuzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Process, Ministry of EducationFujian Normal UniversityFuzhouChina
  3. 3.CSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UABBellaterraSpain
  4. 4.CREAFCerdanyola del VallèsSpain

Personalised recommendations