Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1183–1197 | Cite as

Uses and Preferences of Visitors to Coastal Wetlands in Tourism Destinations (Costa Brava, Spain)

  • Josep Pueyo-RosEmail author
  • Anna Ribas
  • Rosa M. Fraguell
Socioeconomic aspects of Wetlands

Abstract

The local development policies of coastal tourism destinations are frequently focused on popular resources, such as beaches, and tend to overlook coastal wetlands, which are often located in the interstitial spaces of urbanistic transformations caused by mass tourism and considered untended marginal sites. This article investigates the uses and preferences of visitors to these wetlands with the goal of increasing cultural sustainability, improving conservation and strengthening management policies. Although the results show that almost all the current uses of coastal wetlands are recreational (such as cycling, running and walking), visitors have indicated that the positive aspects of these sites are related to their landscape quality and degree of naturalness. The results also suggest that although repeat visitors are aware of wetlands’ value, increasing the consciousness of local inhabitants regarding their value is important for prioritising local policies designed to promote the conservation of wetlands located at coastal tourism destinations. Finally, our study results indicate that improving cultural sustainability is compatible with improving the ecological status of coastal wetlands.

Keywords

Wetlands tourism Cultural sustainability Ecosystem services Coastal destinations Costa Brava 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are pleased to mention their collaboration with Maria Blanco in the survey collection. This article is part of the project “Analysis of the trends and resilience strategies in use and water consumption in tourist areas. The case of Costa Brava” [number CSO2010-17488], which is funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain). The Ministry of Education, Science and Sports (Spain) funds the PhD student grant to the first author [number FPU13/00663].

References

  1. Asah ST, Guerry AD, Blahna DJ, Lawler JJ (2014) Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications. Ecosystem Services 10:180–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbaza Y, Cals J (1988) El Paisatge humà de la Costa Brava. Edicions 62, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier EB, Acreman M, Knowler D (1997) Economic valuation of wetlands: a guide for policy makers and planners. RAMSAR Convention Bureau, GlandGoogle Scholar
  4. Benages-Albert M, Di Masso A, Porcel S et al (2015) Revisiting the appropriation of space in metropolitan river corridors. Journal of Environmental Psychology 42:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkeland I (2008) Cultural sustainability: industrialism, placelessness and the re-animation of place. Ethics, Place & Environment 11:283–297.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13668790802559692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birol E, Hanley N, Koundouri P, Kountouris Y (2009) Optimal management of wetlands: quantifying trade-offs between flood risks, recreation, and biodiversity conservation. Water Resources Research 45:W11426.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006955 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blázquez Salom M (1998) Los usos recreativos y turísticos de los espacios naturales protegidos. el alcance del ocio en el medio natural de Mallorca. Investigaciones Geográficas 19:105–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burger J (2003) Assessing perceptions about ecosystem health and restoration options in three east coast estuaries. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 83:145–162.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022505300319 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burton RJF, Paragahawewa UH (2011) Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes. Journal of Rural Studies 27:95–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Liljenstolpe C (2003) Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments. Ecological Economics 47:95–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2002.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cazorla X (ed) (2015) Pla de foment del turisme de natural als espais naturals protegits de Catalunya. Generalitat de Catalunya, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  12. Correia A, Zins AH, Silva F (2015) Why do tourists persist in visiting the same destination? Tourism Economics 21:205–221.  https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2014.0443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dhakal SP (2014) An exploratory perspective on sustainable tourism as wise-use of a protected wetland in Thailand. International Journal of Tourism Policy 5:159.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTP.2014.063079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolnicar S (2002) A Review of unquestioned standards in using cluster analysis for data-driven market segmentation, CD Conference Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2002 (ANZMAC 2002). Deakin University, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  15. Esses VM, Maio GR (2002) Expanding the assessment of attitude components and structure: the benefits of open-ended measures. European Review of Social Psychology 12:71–101.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Essex S, Kent M, Newnham R (2004) Tourism development in Mallorca: is water supply a constraint? Journal of Sustainable Tourism 12:4–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580408667222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Everitt B (1977) Cluster Analysis. Heinemann Educational Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Faccioli M, Riera Font A, Torres CM (2015) Valuing the recreational benefits of wetland adaptation to climate change: a trade-off between species’ abundance and diversity. Environmental Management 55:550–563.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0407-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman AM (2003) The Measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Ghermandi A, Nunes PALD (2013) A Global map of costal recreation values: results from a spatially explicit based meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 86:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (2005) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, Hoboken.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim T, Petrolia DR (2013) Public perceptions of wetland restoration benefits in Louisiana. ICES Journal of Marine Science 70:1045–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim SO, Shelby B (2011) Effects of information on perceived crowding and encounter norms. Environmental Management 47:876–884.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9654-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47:583–621.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2280779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee TH (2011) How recreation involvement, place attachment and conservation commitment affect environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 19:895–915.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.570345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luo Y, Deng J (2008) The new environmental paradigm and nature-based tourism motivation. Journal of Travel Research 46:392–402.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507308331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manuel PM (2003) Cultural perceptions of small urban wetlands: cases from the Halifax Regional Municipality, Nova Scotia, Canada. Wetlands 23:921–940.  https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0921:CPOSUW]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martí C, Fraguell RM (2007) La Costa Brava. Fundació Caixa Girona, GironaGoogle Scholar
  29. MEA (2005) Ecosystem services and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  30. Milcu AI, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J (2013) Cultural Ecosystem Services: A literature review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society 18(3):44Google Scholar
  31. Nassauer JI (2004) Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetland restorations: cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands 24:756–765.  https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0756:MTSOMW]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oh C-O, Draper J, Dixon AW (2009) Assessing tourists’ multi-attribute preferences for public beach access. Coastal Management 37:119–135.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750802701128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer JF, Smardon RC (1988) Human-use values of wetlands; an assessment in Juneau, Alaska. In: Kusler JA, Daly S, Brooks G (eds) Proceedings of the national wetland symposium: urban wetlands. Association of Wetland managers, Oakland, pp 108–114Google Scholar
  34. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org.
  35. Roca E, Villares M, Ortego MI (2009) Assessing public perceptions on beach quality according to beach users’ profile: a case study in the Costa Brava (Spain). Tourism Management 30:598–607.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roebeling P, Abrantes N, Ribeiro S, Almeida P (2016) Estimating cultural benefits from surface water status improvements in freshwater wetland ecosystems. Science of The Total Environment 545–546:219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.063 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruoso L-E, Plant R, Maurel P et al (2015) Reading ecosystem services at the local scale through a territorial approach: the case of peri-urban agriculture in the Thau Lagoon, Southern France. Ecology and Society 20:11.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07694-200311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sachs L (1997) Angewandte statistik. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saldaña J (2013) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.2002.1041893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sardà R, Mora J, Ariza E et al (2009) Decadal shifts in beach user sand availability on the Costa Brava (Northwestern Mediterranean Coast). Tourism Management 30:158–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smardon RC (1988) Aesthetic, recreational, landscape values of urban wetlands. In: Kusler JA, Daly S, Brooks G (eds) Proceedings of the national wetland symposium: urban wetlands. Association of Wetland managers, Oakland, pp 92–96Google Scholar
  42. Smardon RC (2006) Heritage values and functions of wetlands in Southern Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning 74:296–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smardon RC (2012) A review of wetland use and management of the Nariva Swamp, Trinidad. Caribbean Geography 17:73–93Google Scholar
  44. Soini K, Birkeland I (2014) Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum 51:213–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Torres CM, Riera A, García D (2009) Are preferences for water quality different for second-home residents? Tourism Economics 15:629–651.  https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009789036620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58:236–244.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2282967 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhao Q, Bai J, Huang L et al (2016) A review of methodologies and success indicators for coastal wetland restoration. Ecological Indicators 60:442–452.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeografiaUniversitat de GironaGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations