Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 36, Supplement 2, pp 445–459 | Cite as

Implications of Climate Change for Wetland-Dependent Birds in the Prairie Pothole Region

  • Valerie A. Steen
  • Susan K. SkagenEmail author
  • Cynthia P. Melcher
Original Research

Abstract

The habitats and food resources required to support breeding and migrant birds dependent on North American prairie wetlands are threatened by impending climate change. The North American Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) hosts nearly 120 species of wetland-dependent birds representing 21 families. Strategic management requires knowledge of avian habitat requirements and assessment of species most vulnerable to future threats. We applied bioclimatic species distribution models (SDMs) to project range changes of 29 wetland-dependent bird species using ensemble modeling techniques, a large number of General Circulation Models (GCMs), and hydrological climate covariates. For the U.S. PPR, mean projected range change, expressed as a proportion of currently occupied range, was −0.31 (± 0.22 SD; range − 0.75 to 0.16), and all but two species were projected to lose habitat. Species associated with deeper water were expected to experience smaller negative impacts of climate change. The magnitude of climate change impacts was somewhat lower in this study than earlier efforts most likely due to use of different focal species, varying methodologies, different modeling decisions, or alternative GCMs. Quantification of the projected species-specific impacts of climate change using species distribution modeling offers valuable information for vulnerability assessments within the conservation planning process.

Keywords

Climate change Land use Prairie pothole region Species distribution modeling Wetland birds Wetland dynamics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Plains and Prairie Pothole Landscape Conservation Cooperative, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the USGS North Central Climate Science Center. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Supplementary material

13157_2016_791_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15 kb)
13157_2016_791_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.7 mb)
ESM 2 (PDF 1750 kb)

References

  1. Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology 43:1223–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MG, Rhymer JM, Rohwer FC (1992) Philopatry, dispersal, and the genetic structure of waterfowl populations. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 365–395Google Scholar
  3. Austin JE (2002) Responses of dabbling ducks to wetland conditions in the prairie pothole region. Waterbirds 25:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin JE, Guntenspergen GR, Sklebar HT, Buhl TK (2003) Differences in distribution of modified basins and ducks relative to roadside transects. Wetlands 23:140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballard T, Seager R, Smerdon JE, Cook BI, Ray AJ, Rajagopalan B, Kushnir Y, Nakamura J, Henderson N (2014) Hydroclimate variability and change in the prairie pothole region: the “duck factory” of North America. Earth Interactions:18–014. doi: 10.1175/EI-D-14-0004.1
  6. Barbet-Massin M, Walther BA, Thuiller W, Rahbek C, Jiguet F (2009) Potential impacts of climate change on the winter distribution of afro-Palaearctic migrant passerines. Biology Letters 5:248–251Google Scholar
  7. Baschuk MS, Koper N, Wrubleski DA, Goldsborough G (2012) Effects of water depth, cover and food resources on habitat use of marsh birds and waterfowl in boreal wetlands of Manitoba, Canada. Waterbirds 35:44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyersbergen GW, Niemuth ND, Norton MR (2004) Northern Prairie and Parkland Waterbird Conservation Plan. Prairie Pothole Joint Venture, Denver, Colorado. 183 pp. Available via https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/refuges/hapetResources/updatedFiles/ publications/Beyersbergen.et.al. 2004.waterbird.plan.PPJV.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
  9. Buisson L, Thuiller W, Casajus N, Lek S, Grenouillet G (2010) Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution. Global Change Biology 16:1145–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casey D (2005) Prairie pothole joint venture 2005 implementation plan: section V—landbird plan. Available via http://ppjv.org/assets/pdf/12_Landbird_Plan.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2016Google Scholar
  11. Conway CJ (2011) Standardized north American marsh bird monitoring protocol. Waterbirds 34:319–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and Deepwater habitats of the United States. US Department of the Interior, US Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
  13. Cramer JS (1999) Predictive performance of the binary logit model in unbalanced samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D-the Statistician 48:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doherty KE, Ryba AJ, Stemler CL, Niemuth ND, Meeks WA (2013) Conservation planning in an era of change: state of the U.S. prairie pothole region. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37:546–563Google Scholar
  15. Dormann CF, Purschke O, Marquez JRG, Lautenbach S, Schroder B (2008) Components of uncertainty in species distribution analysis: a case study of the great Grey shrike. Ecology 89:3371–3386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T, McClean C, Osborne PE, Reineking B, Schröder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2012) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drilling NE (2007) South Dakota statewide colonial and semi-colonial waterbird inventory with a plan for long-term monitoring: Final Report. RMBO Tech. Rep. M-ColonySD-04. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO. 80 pp. Available via http://www.rmbo.org/dataentry/postingArticle/dataBox/GFPWildl_Rpt.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2016
  18. Ehrlich P, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988) Birder’s handbook. Simon and Schuster, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Euliss NH Jr, Mushet DM (1996) Water-level fluctuation in wetlands as a function of landscape condition in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16:587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galbraith H, DesRochers DW, Brown S, Reed JM (2014) Predicting vulnerabilities of north American shorebirds to climate change. PLoS One 9(9):e108899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia RA, Burgess ND, Cabeza M, Rahbek C, Araujo MB (2012) Exploring consensus in twenty-first century projections of climatically suitable areas for African vertebrates. Global Change Biology 18:1253–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glick P, Stein BA, Edelson NA (2011) Scanning the conservation horizon: a guide to climate change vulnerability assessment. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C. Available via http://www.nwf.org/~/media/pdfs/global-warming/climate-smart-conservation/nwfscanningtheconservationhorizonfinal92311.ashx. Accessed 4 Mar 2016
  23. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Araujo MB, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, Sykes MT (2006) Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30:751–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helmers DL (1992) Shorebird management manual. Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network, Manomet, MA. 58 pp. Available via http://www.lmvjv.org/library/shorebird_ management_manual_1992.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2016
  25. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2000) Model-building strategies and methods for logistic regression. Applied Logistic Regression, Third Edition, pp. 89–151Google Scholar
  26. Jarnevich CS, Stohlgren TJ, Kumar S, Morisette JT, Holcombe TR (2015) Caveats for correlative species distribution modeling. Ecological Informatics 29:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jimenez-Valverde A, Lobo JM (2007) Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology 31:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jimenez-Valverde A, Barve N, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Nakazawa Y, Papes M, Soberon J, Sukumaran J, Peterson AT (2011) Dominant climate influences on north American bird distributions. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20:114–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson WC, Millett BV, Gilmanov T, Voldseth RA, Guntenspergen GR, Naugle DE (2005) Vulnerability of northern prairie wetlands to climate change. Bioscience 55:863–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson WC, Werner B, Guntenspergen GR, Voldseth RA, Millett B, Naugle DE, Tulbure M, Carroll RWH, Tracy J, Olawsky C (2010) Prairie wetland complexes as landscape functional units in a changing climate. Bioscience 60:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson WC, Werner B, Guntenspergen GR (2015) Non-linear responses of glaciated prairie wetlands to climate warming. Climatic Change 134:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaminski RM, Weller MW (1992) Breeding habitats of Nearctic waterfowl. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 568–589Google Scholar
  33. Kantrud HA (1993) Duck nest success on conservation reserve program land in the prairie pothole region. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 48:238–242Google Scholar
  34. Kantrud HA, Stewart RE (1977) Use of natural basin wetlands by breeding waterfowl in North Dakota. Journal of Wildlife Management 41:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kantrud HA, Stewart RE (1984) Ecological distribution and crude density of breeding birds on prairie wetlands. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:426–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kantrud HA, Krapu GL, Swanson GA (1989) Prairie basin wetlands of the Dakotas: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 85(7.28)Google Scholar
  37. Kushlan JA, Steinkamp MJ, Parsons KC et al. (2002/0 Waterbird Conservation for the Americas: The North American Waterbird Conservation Plan, Version 1. Waterbird Conservation for the Americas. Washington, DC Google Scholar
  38. Lawler JJ, Shafer SL, White D, Kareiva P, Maurer EP, Blaustein AR, Bartlein PJ (2009) Projected climate-induced faunal change in the western hemisphere. Ecology 90:588–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Burges SJ (1994) A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research 99(D7):14415–14428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luttschwager KA, Higgins KF (1992) Nongame bird, game bird, and deer use of conservation reserve program field in eastern South Dakota. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 71:31–36Google Scholar
  41. Maurer EP, Wood AW, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP, Nijssen B (2002) A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. Journal of Climate 15:3237–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maurer EP, Brekke L, Pruitt T, Duffy PB (2007) Fine-resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 88:504–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (1993) Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Morrison RIG, McCaffery BJ, Gill RE, Skagen SK, Jones SL, Page GW, Gratto-Trevor CL, Andres BA (2006) Population estimates of north American shorebirds, 2006. Wader Study Group Bulletin 111:67–85Google Scholar
  45. Murkin HR, Murkin EJ, Ball JP (1997) Avian habitat selection and prairie wetland dynamics: a 10-year experiment. Ecological Applications 7:1144–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. National Geographic Society (1985) Field guide to the birds of North America, 2nd edn. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, p. 464Google Scholar
  47. Nicotra AB, Beever EA, Roberston AL, Hofmann GE, O’Leary JO (2015) Assessing the components of adaptive capacity to improve conservation and management efforts under global change. Conservation Biology 29:1268–1278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Niemuth N (2005) Prairie pothole joint venture 2005 implementation plan: section IV—waterbird plan. Available via http://ppjv.org/assets/pdf/11_Waterbird_Plan.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2016
  49. Niemuth ND, Solberg JW (2003) Response of waterbirds to number of wetlands in the prairie pothole region of North Dakota, U.S.a. Waterbirds 26:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Niemuth ND, Beyersbergen GW, Norton MR (2005). Waterbird conservation planning in the Northern Prairie and Parkland Region: integration across borders and with other bird conservation Iinitiatives. In: Ralph, JC, Rich, TD (eds) Bird conservation implementation and integration in the Americas, Vol. 1. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191. pp. 184–189Google Scholar
  51. Niemuth ND, Estey ME, Reynolds RE, Loesch CR, Meeks WA (2006) Use of wetlands by spring-migrant shorebirds in agricultural landscapes of North Dakota’s drift prairie. Wetlands 26:30–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Niemuth ND, Dahl AL, Estey ME, Loesch CR (2007) Representation of landcover along breeding bird survey routes in the Northern Plains. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:2258–2265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Niemuth ND, Wangler B, Reynolds RE (2010) Spatial and temporal variation in wet area of wetlands in the prairie pothole region of North Dakota and South Dakota. Wetlands 30:1053–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Niemuth ND, Fleming KK, Reynolds RE (2014) Waterfowl conservation in the US prairie pothole region: confronting the complexities of climate change. PLoS One 9(6):e100034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100034 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Panjabi AO, Blancher PJ, Dettmers R, Rosenberg KV (2012) The Partners in Flight Handbook on Species Assessment, Technical Series No. 3 Available via http://www.rmbo.org/pubs/downloads/Handbook2012.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
  56. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography 12:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Price J, Droege S, Price A (1995) The summer atlas of north American birds. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Provost MW (1947) Nesting of birds in the marshes of Northwest Iowa. American Midland Naturalist 38:485–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosenberg KV, Pashley D, Andres B, et al. (2014) The State of the Birds 2014 watch list. North American Bird Conservation Initiative, U.S. Committee. Washington, D.C. Available via http://www.stateofthebirds.org/extinctions/watchlist.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2016.
  60. Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ Jr, Link WA (2014) The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966–2013. Version 01.30.2015. U.S. Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center , Laurel, MD. Available via http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/. Accessed 12 Jan 2016
  61. Skagen SK (1997) Stopover ecology of transitory populations: the case of migrant shorebirds. Ecological Studies 125:244–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Skagen SK (2006) Migration stopovers and the conservation of arctic-breeding calidridine sandpipers. The Auk 123:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Skagen SK, Knopf FL (1993) Toward conservation of midcontinental shorebird migrations. Conservation Biology 7:533–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Skagen SK, Knopf FL (1994) Migrating shorebirds and habitat dynamics at a prairie wetlands complex. Wilson Bulletin 106:91–105Google Scholar
  65. Skagen SK, Oman HD (1996) Dietary flexibility of shorebirds in the western hemisphere. Canadian Field-Naturalist 110:419–444Google Scholar
  66. Skagen SK, Thompson G (2000) U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan: Northern Plains/Prairie Potholes Regional Shorebird Conservation Plan, ver. 1. U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO, and National Audubon Society, Fargo, ND. Available at http://www.shorebirdplan.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/NORPLPP2.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2016
  67. Skagen SK, Sharpe PB, Waltermire RG, Dillon MB (1999) Biogeographical profiles of shorebird migration in midcontinental North America. U.S. Geological Survey Biological Science Report 2000–0003. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/bsr/2000/0003/report.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2016
  68. Skagen SK, Granfors DA, Melcher CP (2008) On determining the significance of ephemeral continental wetlands to north American migratory shorebirds. Auk 125:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith GW (1995) A critical review of aerial and ground surveys of breeding waterfowl in North America. Biological Science Report 5, National Biological Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  70. Sofaer HR, Skagen SK, Barsugli JJ, Rashford BS, Reese GC, Hoeting JA, Wood AW, Noon BR (2016) Projected wetland densities under climate change: habitat loss but little geographic shift in conservation strategy. Ecological Applications. doi: 10.1890/15-0750.1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Sorenson LG, Goldberg R, Root TL, Anderson MG (1998) Potential effects of global warming on waterfowl populations breeding in the northern Great Plains. Climatic Change 40:343–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Steen VA, Powell AN (2012) Wetland selection by breeding and foraging black terns in the prairie pothole region of the United States. Condor 114:115–165Google Scholar
  73. Steen VA, Skagen SK, Noon BR (2014) Vulnerability of breeding waterbirds to climate change in the prairie pothole region. USA Plos One 9:e96747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stewart RE, Kantrud HA (1972) Population estimates of breeding birds in North Dakota. The Auk 89:766–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stralberg D, Matsuoka SM, Hamann A, Bayne EM, Solymos P, Schmiegelow FKA, Wang X, Cumming SG, Song SJ (2015) Projecting boreal bird responses to climate change: the signal exceeds the noise. Ecological Applications 25:52–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araujo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:8245–8250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Araujo MB (2009) BIOMOD - a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Torrence SM, Butler MG (2006) Spatial structure of a diving duck (Aythya, Oxyura) guild: how does habitat structure and competition influence diving duck habitat use within northern prairie wetlands? Canadian Journal of Zoology 84:1358–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2008) Birds of conservation concern 2008. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, Arlington, Virginia. Available via http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/. Accessed 4 Mar 2016
  80. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2015) Waterfowl population status, 2015. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC USA. Available via http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/surveys-and-data/Population-status/Waterfowl/WaterfowlPopulationStatusReport15. pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2016
  81. U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan Partnership. (2015). U.S. Shorebirds of Conservation Concern Available via http://www.shorebirdplan.org/science/assessment-conservation-status-shorebirds/. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
  82. Walker J, Rotella JJ, Schmidt JH, Loesch CR, Reynolds RE, Lindberg MS, Ringelman JK, Stephens SE (2013) Distribution of duck broods relative to habitat characteristics in the prairie pothole region. Journal of Wildlife Management 77:392–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weller MW (1961) Breeding biology of the least bittern. Wilson Bulletin 73:11–35Google Scholar
  84. Weller MW, Fredrickson LH (1974) Avian ecology of a managed glacial marsh. Living Bird 12:269–291Google Scholar
  85. Weller MW, Spatcher CS (1965) Role of habitat in the distribution and abundance of marsh birds. Iowa State University, AmesGoogle Scholar
  86. Wood AW, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Climatic Change 62:189–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Woodin MC, Swanson GA (1989) Foods and dietary strategies of prairie-nesting ruddy ducks and redheads. Condor 91:280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valerie A. Steen
    • 1
  • Susan K. Skagen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cynthia P. Melcher
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyFort Collins Science CenterFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations