, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 1191–1196 | Cite as

Phosphorus Release due to Decomposition of Wetland Plants

Original Research


Agricultural activities are major sources of non-point pollutants causing eutrophication. Vegetated constructed wetlands are used as a best management practice for sequestration of nutrients from agricultural runoff. However, plants release nutrients back into the system as they decompose after senescence, affecting the nutrient removal efficiency of a constructed wetland. This information is important for a focused selection of plants and for improving the effectiveness of a constructed wetland. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to study the release of phosphorus by common freshwater macrophytes - Juncus effusus, Carex lurida and Dichanthelium acuminatum var. acuminatum during plant decomposition. Microcosms with the mixed culture of these three species showed higher phosphorus retention rates compared to monoculture microcosms. Results indicate that plant species differ in their nutrient removal efficiencies when grown in the mixed culture compared to monoculture treatments, indicating that nutrient removal efficiencies vary with plant species composition. Thus, plant species may play an important role in determining the phosphorus removal rates of vegetated constructed wetlands.


Decomposition Phosphorus Constructed wetlands Dichanthelium acuminatum Juncus effusus and Carex lurida 


  1. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoi T, Hayashi T (1996) Nutrient removal by water lettuce (Pisitia stratiotes). Water Science and Technology 34:407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouldin J, Farris J, Moore M, Smith S, Stephens W, Cooper C (2005) Evaluated fate and effects of atrazine and lambda‐cyhalothrin in vegetated and unvegetated microcosms. Environmental Toxicology 20:487–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd CE (1969) Production, mineral nutrient absorption, and biochemical assimilation by Justicia americana and Alternanthera philoxeroides. Archives of Hydrobiology 66:139–160Google Scholar
  5. Boyd CE, Hess LW (1970) Factors Influencing shoot production and mineral nutrient levels in Typha latifolia. Ecology 51:296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brisson J, Chazarenc F (2009) Maximizing pollutant removal in constructed wetlands: should we pay more attention to macrophyte species selection? Science of the Total Environment 407:3923–3930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brix H, Schierup HH (1989) The use of aquatic macrophytes in water-pollution control. Ambio 18:100–107Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8:559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper C, Moore M, Bennett E, Smith S Jr, Farris J, Milam C, Shields F Jr (2004) Innovative uses of vegetated drainage ditches for reducing agricultural runoff. Water Science and Technology 49:117–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Delgado M, Bigeriego M, Guardiola E (1993) Uptake of Zn, Cr and Cd by water hyacinths. Water Research 27:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garver EG, Dubbe DR, Pratt DC (1988) Seasonal patterns in accumulation and partitioning of biomass and macronutrients in Typha spp. Aquatic Botany 32:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hammer DA, Bastian RK (1989) Wetlands ecosystems: natural water purifiers. In: Hammer DA (ed) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Lewis publishers, Chelsea, pp 5–19Google Scholar
  13. Howarth R, Chan F, Conley DJ, Garnier J, Doney SC, Marino R, Billen G (2011) Coupled biogeochemical cycles: eutrophication and hypoxia in temperate estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC. Baca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  15. Kao JT, Titus JE, Zhu WX (2003) Differential nitrogen and phosphorus retention by five wetland plant species. Wetlands 23:979–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kröger R, Holland MM, Moore M, Cooper C (2007) Plant senescence: A mechanism for nutrient release in temperate agricultural wetlands. Environmental Pollution 146:114–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maine MA, NL S é, Lagger SC (2004) Chromium bioaccumulation: comparison of the capacity of two floating aquatic macrophytes. Water Research 38:1494–1501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Menon R, Holland MM (2013) Phosphorus retention by Juncus effusus, Carex lurida and Dichanthelium acuminatum var. acuminatum in freshwater wetlands. Water, Air, Soil Pollution 224:1602.Google Scholar
  19. Menon R, Jackson CR, Holland MM (2013) The Influence of Vegetation on Microbial Enzyme Activity and Bacterial Community Structure in Freshwater Constructed Wetland Sediments. Wetlands:1–14.Google Scholar
  20. Moshiri G (1993) Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy R, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reddy KR, O’Connor GA, Schelske CL (1999) Phosphorus biogeochemistry in subtropical ecosystems. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  23. Richardson CJ, Marshall PE (1986) Processes controlling movement, storage, and export of phosphorus in a fen peatland. Ecological Monographs 56:279–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schindler DW (2006) Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication. Limnology and Oceanography 51:356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharpley A, S Rekolainen, H Tunney, O Carton, P Brookes and A Johnston (1997) Phosphorus in agriculture and its environmental implications. p. 1–53. Phosphorus loss from soil to water. Proceedings of a workshop, Wexford, Irish Republic, 29–31 September 1995. CAB InternationalGoogle Scholar
  26. Tanner CC (1996) Plants for constructed wetland treatment systems - A comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake of eight emergent species. Ecological Engineering 7:59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tyler H, Moore M, Locke M (2012) Potential for phosphate mitigation from agricultural runoff by three aquatic macrophytes. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 223:4557–4564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. USDA and NRCS (2007) The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Lousiana.
  29. Vymazal J (1996) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic the first 5 years experience. Water Science and Technology 34:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment 380:48–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. White SA, Taylor MD, Damrel DZ (2012) Floral colonization of a free-water surface constructed wetland System in Grady County, Georgia. Castanea 77:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zazo JA, Paull JS, Jaffe PR (2008) Influence of plants on the reduction of hexavalent chromium in wetland sediments. Environmental Pollution 156:29–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe University of MississippiUniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations