Wetlands

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 609–615 | Cite as

Increased Methane Emissions by an Introduced Phragmites australis Lineage under Global Change

Article

Abstract

North American wetlands have been invaded by an introduced lineage of the common reed, Phragmites australis. Native lineages occur in North America, but many populations have been extirpated by the introduced conspecific lineage. Little is known about how subtle changes in plant lineage may affect methane (CH4) emissions. Native and introduced Phragmites were grown under current and predicted future levels of atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen(N) pollution in order to understand how CH4 emissions may vary between conspecific lineages. We found introduced Phragmites emitted more CH4 than native Phragmites, and that CH4 emissions increased significantly in both with CO2+N treatment. There was no significant difference in CH4 production potentials, but CH4 oxidation potentials were higher in soils from the introduced lineage. Intraspecific plant responses to resource availability changed CH4 emissions, with plant density, root mass, and leaf area being significantly positively correlated with higher emissions. The absence of CO2-only or N-only effects highlights a limitation on the generalization that CH4 emissions are proportional to plant productivity. Our data suggest that intraspecific changes in plant community composition have important implications for greenhouse emissions. Furthermore, global change-enhanced invasion by introduced Phragmites may increase CH4 emissions unless these factors cause a compensatory increase in carbon sequestration.

Keywords

Invasive Conspecific Congener Phragmites Methane Greenhouse Gas Elevated carbon dioxide Nitrogen Wetland 

References

  1. Brix H, Sorrell BK, Lorenzen B (2001) Are Phragmites-dominated wetlands a net source or net sink of greenhouse gases? Aquatic Botany 69:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai ZC, Shan YH, Xu H (2007) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on CH4 emissions from rice fields. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 53:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers RM, Meyerson LA, Saltonstall K (1999) Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquatic Botany 64:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng XL, Peng RH, Chen JQ, Luo YQ, Zhang QF, An SQ, Chen JK, Li B (2007) CH(4) and N(2)O emissions from Spartina alterniflora and Phragmites australis in experimental mesocosms. Chemosphere 68:420–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ding WX, Zhang YH, Cai ZC, Valerie P, Han FX (2010) Response of methane emission to invasion of Spartina alterniflora and exogenous N deposition in the coastal salt marsh. Atmospheric Environment 44:4588–4594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, Kanninen M (2011) Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nature Geoscience 4:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garnet KN, Megonigal JP, Litchfield C, Taylor GE (2005) Physiological control of leaf methane emission from wetland plants. Aquatic Botany 81:141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Granberg G, Sundh I, Svensson BH, Nilsson M (2001) Effects of temperature, and nitrogen and sulfur deposition, on methane emission from a boreal mire. Ecology 82:1982–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hopkinson CS, Giblin AE (2008) Nitrogen dynamics of coastal salt marshes. In: Capone DG, Bronk DB, Mulholland MR, Carpenter EJ (eds) Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 991–1036Google Scholar
  10. Kao-Kniffin J, Freyre DS, Balser TC (2011) Increased methane emissions from an invasive wetland plant under elevated carbon dioxide levels. Applied Soil Ecology 48:309–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kettenring KM, Mock KE (2012) Genetic diversity, reproductive mode, and dispersal differ between the cryptic invader, Phragmites australis, and its native conspecific. Biological Invasions 14:2489–2504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kettenring KM, de Blois S, Hauber DP (2012) Moving from a regional to a continental perspective of Phragmites australis invasion in North America. AoB Plants pls040 Google Scholar
  13. Kim J, Verma SB, Billesbach DP, Clement RJ (1998) Diel variation in methane emission from a midlatitude prairie wetland: significance of convective through flow in Phragmites australis. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 103:28029–28039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lou YS, Inubushi K, Mizuno T, Hasegawa T, Lin YH, Sakai H, Cheng WG, Kobayashi K (2008) CH4 emission with differences in atmospheric CO2 enrichment and rice cultivars in a Japanese paddy soil. Global Change Biology 14:2678–2687Google Scholar
  15. Marks M, Lapin B, Randall J (1994) Phragmites-australis (P-Communis) - threats, management, and monitoring. Natural Areas Journal 14:285–294Google Scholar
  16. McCormick MK, Kettenring KM, Baron HM, Whigham DF (2010) Spread of invasive Phragmites australis in estuaries with differing degrees of development: genetic patterns, Allee effects and interpretation. Journal of Ecology 98:1369–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mcleod E, Chmura GL, Bouillon S, Salm R, Bjork M, Duarte CM, Lovelock CE, Schlesinger WH, Silliman BR (2011) A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9:552–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Megonigal JP, Schlesinger WH (2002) Methane-limited methanotrophy in tidal freshwater swamps. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16(4):1088Google Scholar
  19. Megonigal JP, Whalen SC, Tissue DT, Bovard BD, Albert DB, Allen AS (1999) A plant-soil-atmosphere microcosm for tracing radiocarbon from photosynthesis through methanogenesis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63:665–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meyerson LA, Viola DV, Brown RN (2010) Hybridization of invasive Phragmites australis with a native subspecies in North America. Biological Invasions 12:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mozdzer TJ, Megonigal JP (2012) Jack-and-master trait responses to elevated CO2 and N: a comparison of native and introduced Phragmites australis. Plos One 7(10):e42794Google Scholar
  22. Mozdzer TJ, Zieman JC (2010) Ecophysiological differences between genetic lineages facilitate the invasion of non-native Phragmites australis in North American Atlantic coast wetlands. Journal of Ecology 98:451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neubauer SC, Givler K, Valentine SK, Megonigal JP (2005) Seasonal patterns and plant-mediated controls of subsurface wetland biogeochemistry. Ecology 86:3334–3344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nykanen H, Vasander H, Huttunen JT, Martikainen PJ (2002) Effect of experimental nitrogen load on methane and nitrous oxide fluxes on ombrotrophic boreal peatland. Plant and Soil 242:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Poffenbarger HJ, Needelman BA, Megonigal JP (2011) Salinity influence on methane emissions from tidal marshes. Wetlands 31:831–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poorter H, Navas ML (2003) Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytologist 157:175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99:2445–2449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharkey TD, Loreto F, Delwiche CF (1991) High-carbon dioxide and sun shade effects on isoprene emission from Oak and Aspen tree leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 14:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sutton-Grier AE, Megonigal JP (2011) Plant species traits regulate methane production in freshwater wetland soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tulbure M, Ghioca DM, Johnston CA, Whigham DF (2012) Inventory and ventilation efficiency of nonnative and native Phragmites australis (common reed) in tidal wetlands of the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries & Coasts 35:1353–1359Google Scholar
  31. van Groenigen KJ, Osenberg CW, Hungate BA (2011) Increased soil emissions of potent greenhouse gases under increased atmospheric CO2. Nature 475:214–U121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Hannen EJ, Veninga M, Bloem J, Gons HJ, Laanbroek HJ (1999) Genetic changes in the bacterial community structure associated with protistan grazers. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie 145:25–38Google Scholar
  33. Vann CD, Megonigal JP (2003) Elevated CO2 and water depth regulation of methane emissions: comparison of woody and non-woody wetland plant species. Biogeochemistry 63:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Watanable AM, Kajiwara TT, Kimura M (1995) Influence of rice cultivar on methane emissions from paddy fields. Plant and Soil 176:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whiting GJ, Chanton JP (1993) Primary production control of methane emission from wetlands. Nature 364:794–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolf AA, Drake BG, Erickson JE, Megonigal JP (2007) An oxygen-mediated positive feedback between elevated carbon dioxide and soil organic matter decomposition in a simulated anaerobic wetland. Global Change Biology 13:2036–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu ZJ, Zheng XH, Wang YS, Han SH, Huang Y, Zhu JG, Butterbach-Bahl K (2004) Effects of elevated CO2 and N fertilization on CH4 emissions from paddy rice fields. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA
  2. 2.Bryn Mawr College, Department of BiologyBryn MawrUSA

Personalised recommendations