, Volume 34, Supplement 1, pp 47–54 | Cite as

Effect of Water Management on Interannual Variation in Bulk Soil Properties from the Eastern Coastal Everglades

  • R. M. Chambers
  • R. L. Hatch
  • T. M. Russell
Hydrological Restoration


We examined interannual variation in soil properties from wetlands occurring in adjacent drainage basins from the southeastern Everglades. Triplicate 10-cm soil cores were collected, homogenized, and analyzed during the wet season 2006–2010 from five freshwater sawgrass wetland marshes and three estuarine mangrove forests. Soil bulk density from the Taylor Slough basin ranged from 0.15 gm-cm−3 to 0.5 gm-cm−3, was higher than from the Panhandle basin every year, and generally increased throughout the study period. Organic matter as a percent loss on ignition ranged from 7 % to 12 % from freshwater marshes and from 13 % to 56 % from estuarine mangroves. Extractable iron in soils was similar among drainage basins and wetland types, typically ranging from 0.6 to 2.0 g Fe kg−1. In contrast, inorganic sulfur was on average over four times higher from estuarine soils relative to freshwater, and was positively correlated with soil organic matter. Finally total soil phosphorus (P) was lower in freshwater soils relative to estuarine soils (84 ± 5 versus 326 ± 32 mg P kg−1). Total P from the freshwater marshes in the Panhandle basin rose throughout the study period from 54.7 ± 8.4 to 107 ± 17 mg P kg−1, a possible outcome of differences in water management between drainage basins.


Bulk density Organic matter Phosphorus Sulfur Southeastern Everglades 



This publication was produced as part of a special issue devoted to investigating the ecological response of over 20 years of hydrologic restoration and active management in the Taylor Slough drainage of Everglades National Park. Support for this special issue was provided by; the Everglades National Park, the Southeast Environmental Research Center, the Florida Coastal Everglades Long-Term Ecological Research program (National Science Foundation cooperative agreement #DBI-0620409), the Everglades Foundation and the South Florida Water Management District. Thanks to AE Cornell, LB Rordam, and AS Morris for processing soil samples and to the FCE-LTER staff for logistics and field support.


  1. Castañeda-Moya E, Twilley RR, Rivera-Monroy VH, Zhang K, Davis SE, Ross M (2010) Sediment and nutrient deposition associated with Hurricane Wilma in mangroves of the Florida coastal Everglades. Estuar Coasts 33:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chambers RM, Fourqurean JW (1991) Alternative criteria for assessing nutrient limitation of a wetland macrophyte (Peltandra virginica (L.) Kunth). Aquat Bot 40:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers RM, Pederson KA (2006) Variation in soil phosphorus, sulfur, and iron pools among south Florida wetlands. Hydrobiologia 569:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambers RM, Fourqurean JW, Macko SA, Hoppenot R (2001) Biogeochemical effects of iron availability on primary producers in a shallow marine carbonate environment. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1278–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Childers DL, Doren RF, Jones R, Noe G, Rugge M, Scinto LJ (2003) Decadal change in vegetation and soil phosphorus patterns across the Everglades landscape. J Environ Qual 32:344–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Childers DL, Boyer JN, Davis SE, Madden CJ, Rudnick DT, Sklar FH (2006a) Relating precipitation and water management to nutrient concentrations in the oligotrophic “upside-down” estuaries of the Florida Everglades. Limnol Oceanogr 51:602–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Childers DL, Iwaniec D, Rondeau D, Rubio G, Verdon E, Madden CJ (2006b) Responses of sawgrass and spikerush to variation in hydrologic drivers and salinity in Southern Everglades marshes. Hydrobiologia 569:273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cline JD (1969) Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural waters. Limnol Oceanogr 14:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis SM (1994) Phosphorous inputs and vegetation sensitivity in the Everglades. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 357–378Google Scholar
  10. Environmental Protection Agency (1993) Paired watershed study design. EPA 841-F-93-009. USEPA, Office of Water, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) South Florida ecosystem assessment: Everglades water management, soil loss, eutrophication and habitat. EPA 904-R-00-003. US-EPA, Office of Research and Development, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilmour C, Orem W, Krabbenhoft D, Mendelssohn I (2007) Preliminary assessment of sulfur sources, trends and effects in the Everglades. Appendix 3B-3, in 2007 South Florida Environmental Report, South Florida Water Management DistrictGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang XL, Zhang JZ (2010) Spatial variation in sediment-water exchange of phosphorus in Florida Bay: AMP as a model organic compound. Environ Sci Technol 44:7790–7795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koch MS, Reddy KR (1992) Distribution of soil and plant nutrients along a trophic gradient in the Florida Everglades. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:192–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kock MS, Benz RE, Rudnick DT (2001) Solid-phase phosphorus pools in highly organic carbonate sediments of nearth-eastern Florida Bay. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 52:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kotun K, Renshaw A (this issue) Taylor Slough hydrology, fifty years of water management 1961–2010. WetlandsGoogle Scholar
  17. Noe GB, Childers DL (2007) Phosphorus budgets in Everglades wetland ecosystems: the effects of hydrology and nutrient enrichment. Wetl Ecol Manag 15:189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Noe G, Childers DL, Jones RD (2001) Phosphorus biogeochemistry and the impacts of phosphorus enrichment: why is the Everglades so unique? Ecosystems 4:603–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Noe GB, Childers DL, Edwards AL, Gaiser E, Jayachandran K, Lee DW, Meeder JF, Richards J, Scinto LJ, Trexler JC, Jones RD (2002) Short-term changes in phosphorus storage in an oligotrophic Everglades wetland ecosystem receiving experimental nutrient enrichment. Biogeochemistry 59:239–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Noe GB, Scinto LJ, Taylor J, Childers DL, Jones RD (2003) Phosphorus cycling and partitioning in an oligotrophic Everglades wetland ecosystem: a radioisotope tracing study. Freshw Biol 48:1993–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osborne TZ, Bruland GL, Newman S, Reddy KR, Grunwald S (2011) Spatial distributions and eco-partitioning of soil biogeochemical properties in the Everglades National Park. Environ Monit Assess 183:395–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Osborne TZ, Reddy KR, Ellis LR, Aumen N, Surratt D, Zimmerman MS, Sadle J (this issue) Evidence of recent phosphorus enrichment in surface soils of Taylor Slough and northeast Everglades National Park. WetlandsGoogle Scholar
  23. Parker FM, III (2000) Changes in water inputs and nutrient loading after restoration of water flow to a southern Everglades wetland landscape. Thesis, Florida International UniversityGoogle Scholar
  24. Perry W (2004) Elements of South Florida’s comprehensive Everglades restoration plan. Ecotoxicology 13:185–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Price RM, Swart PK, Fourqurean JW (2006) Coastal groundwater discharge—an additional source of phosphorus for the oligotrophic wetlands of the Everglades. Hydrobiologia 569:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prospero JM, Landing WM, Schulz M (2010) African dust deposition to Florida: temporal and spatial variability and comparisons to models. J Geophys Res 115:D13304. doi: 10.1029/2009JD012773 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ross MS, Reed DR, Sah JP, Ruiz PL, Lewin M (2003) Vegetation: environment relationships and water management in Shark Slough, Everglades National Park. Wetl Ecol Manag 11:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rudnick D, Chen Z, Childers D, Boyer J, Fontaine T (1999) Phosphorus and nitrogen inputs to Florida Bay: the importance of the Everglades watershed. Estuaries 22:398–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scinto LJ (1997) Phosphorus cycling in a periphyton-dominated freshwater wetland. Dissertation, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  30. Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine—a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron. Anal Chem 42:779–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sullivan PL, Price RM, Schedlbauer JL, Saha A, Gaiser EE (this issue) The influence of hydrologic restoration on groundwater-surface water interaction in a karst wetland, the Everglades (FL, USA). WetlandsGoogle Scholar
  32. United States Congress (2000) Water Resources Development Act of 2000. Title VI—Comprehensive Everglades restorationGoogle Scholar
  33. Waters MN, Smoak JM, Saunders CJ (2012) Historic primary producer communities linked to water quality and hydrologic changes in the northern Everglades. J Paleolimnol. doi: 10.1007/s10933-011-9569-y
  34. Wu Y, Sklar FH, Rutchey K (1997) Analysis and simulations of fragmentation patterns in the Everglades. Ecol Appl 7:268–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang J-Z, Fischer CJ, Ortner PB (2004) Potential availability of sedimentary phosphorus to sediment resuspension in Florida Bay. Global Biogeochem Cycles 18:GB4008. doi: 10.1029/2004GB002255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.W. M. Keck Environmental Field LaboratoryCollege of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations