Wetlands

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 831–842 | Cite as

Salinity Influence on Methane Emissions from Tidal Marshes

Article

Abstract

The relationship between methane emissions and salinity is not well understood in tidal marshes, leading to uncertainty about the net effect of marsh conservation and restoration on greenhouse gas balance. We used published and unpublished field data to investigate the relationships between tidal marsh methane emissions, salinity, and porewater concentrations of methane and sulfate, then used these relationships to consider the balance between methane emissions and soil carbon sequestration. Polyhaline tidal marshes (salinity >18) had significantly lower methane emissions (mean ± sd = 1 ± 2 g m−2 yr−1) than other marshes, and can be expected to decrease radiative forcing when created or restored. There was no significant difference in methane emissions from fresh (salinity = 0–0.5) and mesohaline (5–18) marshes (42 ± 76 and 16 ± 11 g m−2 yr−1, respectively), while oligohaline (0.5–5) marshes had the highest and most variable methane emissions (150 ± 221 g m−2 yr−1). Annual methane emissions were modeled using a linear fit of salinity against log-transformed methane flux (\( \log ({\text{C}}{{\text{H}}_4}) = - 0.056 \times {\text{salinity }} + { 1}{.38} \); r2 = 0.52; p < 0.0001). Managers interested in using marshes as greenhouse gas sinks can assume negligible methane emissions in polyhaline systems, but need to estimate or monitor methane emissions in lower-salinity marshes.

Keywords

Carbon sequestration Sulfate reduction Methane flux Porewater 

Supplementary material

13157_2011_197_MOESM1_ESM.doc (122 kb)
Online Resources(DOC 121 kb)

References

  1. Bartlett KB, Harriss RC, Sebacher DI (1985) Methane flux from coastal salt marshes. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 90:5710–5720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett KB, Bartlett DS, Harriss RC, Sebacher DI (1987) Methane emissions along a salt-marsh salinity gradient. Biogeochemistry 4:183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridgham SD, Megonigal JP, Keller JK, Bliss NB, Trettin C (2006) The carbon balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands 26:889–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chmura GL, Anisfeld SC, Cahoon DR, Lynch JC (2003) Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate Change, 2007. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornell JA, Craft CB, Megonigal JP (2007) Ecosystem gas exchange across a created salt marsh chronosequence. Wetlands 27:240–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Craft C (2007) Freshwater input structures soil properties, vertical accretion, and nutrient accumulation of Georgia and U.S. tidal marshes. Limnology and Oceanography 53:1220–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craft CB, Seneca ED, Broome SW (1993) Vertical accretion in microtidal regularly and irregularly flooded estuarine marshes. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 37:371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawes CJ (1998) Marine botany, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Delaune RD, Smith CJ, Patrick WH (1983) Methane release from Gulf Coast wetlands. Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology 35:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emery WJ, Thomson RE (2001) Data analysis methods in physical oceanography. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Environmental Protection Agency (1971) Sulfate (colorimetric, automated, chloranilate) Washington, D.C. Method # 375.1Google Scholar
  13. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2007. Washington, D.C. EPA 430-R-09-004Google Scholar
  14. Erickson JE, Megonigal JP, Peresta G, Drake BG (2007) Salinity and sea level mediate elevated CO2 effects on C3–C4 plant interactions and tissue nitrogen in a Chesapeake Bay tidal wetland. Global Change Biology 13:202–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fofonoff NP, Millard RCJ (1983) Algorithms for computation of fundamental properties of seawater. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Hesslein RH (1976) An in situ sampler for close interval porewater studies. Limnology and Oceanography 21:912–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirota M, Senga Y, Seike Y, Nohara S, Kunii H (2007) Fluxes of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide in two contrastive fringing zones of coastal lagoon, Lake Nakaumi, Japan. Chemosphere 68:597–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Insightful Corporation (2001) S-Plus 6 for windows user’s guide. Insightful Corp, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  19. Institute SAS (1987) SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  20. Keller JK, Wolf AA, Weisenhorn PB, Drake BG, Megonigal JP (2009) Elevated CO2 affects porewater chemistry in a brackish marsh. Biogeochemistry 96:101–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelley CA, Martens CS, Chanton JP (1990) Variations in sedimentary carbon remineralization rates in the White-Oak River Estuary, North Carolina. Limnology and Oceanography 35:372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelley CA, Martens CS, Ussler W (1995) Methane dynamics across a tidally flooded riverbank margin. Limnology and Oceanography 40:1112–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King GM, Wiebe WJ (1978) Methane release from soils of a Georgia salt marsh. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta 42:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyman J (1969) Redefinition of salinity and chlorinity. Limnology and Oceanography 14:928–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magenheimer JF, Moore TR, Chmura GL, Daoust RJ (1996) Methane and carbon dioxide flux from a macrotidal salt marsh, Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick Canada. Estuaries 19:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marsh AS, Rasse DP, Drake BG, Megonigal JP (2005) Effect of elevated CO2 on carbon pools and fluxes in a brackish marsh. Estuaries 28:694–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McAullife C (1971) GC determination of solutes by multiple phase equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Technology 1:46–51Google Scholar
  28. McKee KL, Mendelssohn IA, Hester MW (1988) Reexamination of porewater sulfide concentrations and redox potentials near the aerial roots of Rhizophora-Mangle and Avicennia-Germinans. American Journal of Botany 75:1352–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Megonigal JP, Schlesinger WH (2002) Methane-limited methanotrophy in tidal freshwater swamps. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16:1088. doi:10.1029/2001GB001594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Megonigal JP, Hines ME, Visscher PT (2004) Anaerobic metabolism: linkages to trace gases and aerobic processes. In: Schlesinger WH (ed) Biogeochemistry. Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford, pp 317–424Google Scholar
  31. Nedwell DB, Embley TM, Purdy KJ (2004) Sulphate reduction, methanogenesis and phylogenetics of the sulphate reducing bacterial communities along an estuarine gradient. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 37:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nellemann C, Corcoran E, Duarte CM, Valdés L, DeYoung C, Fonseca L, Grimsditch GE (2009) Blue Carbon. A Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  33. Neubauer SC (2008) Contributions of mineral and organic components of tidal freshwater marsh accretion. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 78:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neubauer SC, Miller WD, Anderson IC (2000) Carbon cycling in a tidal freshwater marsh ecosystem: a carbon gas flux study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 199:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rejmankova E, Post RA (1996) Methane in sulfate-rich and sulfate-poor wetland sediments. Biogeochemistry 34:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlesinger WH (1997) Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change, 2nd edn. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  37. Sebacher DI, Harriss RC (1982) A system for measuring methane fluxes from inland and coastal wetland environments. Journal of Environmental Quality 11:34–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Senior E, Lindstrom EB, Banat IM, Nedwell DB (1982) Sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in the sediment of a saltmarsh on the east coast of the United Kingdom. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 43:987–996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sutton-Grier AS, Megonigal JP (2011) Plant species traits regulate methane production in freshwater wetland soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tong C, Wang W-Q, Zeng C-S, Marrs R (2010) Methane (CH4) emission from a tidal marsh in the Min River estuary, southeast China. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A 45:506–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van der Nat FJ, Middelburg JJ (2000) Methane emission from tidal freshwater marshes. Biogeochemistry 49:103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang ZP, Zeng D, Patrick WH (1996) Methane emissions from natural wetlands. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 42:143–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang D, Chen Z, Xu S (2009) Methane emission from Yangtze estuarine wetland, China. Journal of Geophysical Research 114:GO2011Google Scholar
  44. Watson R, Noble I, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DH, Dokken DJ (2000) Land use, land-use change, and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  45. Weston NB, Vile MA, Neubauer SC, Velinsky DJ (2011) Accelerated microbial organic matter mineralization following salt-water intrusion into tidal freshwater marsh soils. Biogeochemistry 102:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whalen SC (2005) Biogeochemistry of methane exchange between natural wetlands and the atmosphere. Environmental Engineering Science 22:73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whigham DF (2009) Primary production in tidal freshwater wetlands. In: Barendregt A, Whigham DF, Baldwin AH (eds) Tidal freshwater wetlands. Margraf and Backhuys Publishers, Leiden and Weikersheim, pp 115–121Google Scholar
  48. Whiting GJ, Chanton JP (2001) Greenhouse carbon balance of wetlands: methane emission versus carbon sequestration. Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology 53:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winfrey MR, Ward DM (1983) Substrates for sulfate reduction and methane production in intertidal sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 45:193–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wylynko D (ed) (1999) Prairie wetlands and carbon sequestration: Assessing sinks under the Kyoto Protocol. IISD, Ducks Unlimited Canada, Wetlands International, WinnipegGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and TechnologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterSmithsonian InstitutionEdgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations