Greenhouse Gas Fluxes from Dutch Peatland Water Bodies: Importance of the Surrounding Landscape
- 234 Downloads
Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes were quantified for 14 ditches and larger water bodies in Dutch peatlands, surrounded by different habitat types, using concentration changes in floating flux chambers. Average fluxes from these waters were 11 ± 2 (mean ± SE) mg CH4 m−2 h−1 (n = 66) and 86 ± 21 mg CO2 m−2 h−1 (n = 55). Variability among water bodies was substantial in both gases and could be explained by water depth and surrounding habitat. Ditches in intensively used dairy land or rough pastures had significantly higher CH4 emission rates (17 ± 6 and 18 ± 8 mg CH4 m−2 h−1) than those in reed and sedge beds or open water (7 ± 1 and 5 ± 2 mg CH4 m−2 h−1). Bubbles contributed between 34 and 69% to the total CH4 flux, with higher proportions observed in ditches sheltered by tall vegetation. Observed day-time CO2 fluxes were either positive (shaded ditches in reed and sedge stands or rough pasture; 120–150 mg CO2 m−2 h−1) or did not differ from zero (open water, ditches in intensively managed pasture). Since these peatlands have substantial areas of permanent surface water (6–43%), landscape-scale carbon flux estimates are improved by incorporating specific flux estimates for these waters.
KeywordsCarbon dioxide Flux measurements Habitat type Land use Methane Water level Wetlands
Our work was funded by the ‘Climate changes spatial planning’ programme as BSIK-KvR ME5. Part of the field work was conducted by Joanna Gorska and Cristina Garcia Perez. The technical workshop staff of the Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences made our practical and durable chambers. We thank Elmar Veenendaal, Arina Schrier-Uijl, Dimmy Hendriks and Ko van Huissteden for cooperative discussion.
- Aerts R (2000) Possibilities for carbon storage in grasslands on peat in the Netherlands. In: Van Amstel A (ed) Monitoring CO2 sinks in the Netherlands: priorities for improvement. Wageningen University, Wageningen, pp 25–27Google Scholar
- Franken ROG, Van Vierssen W, Lubberding HJ (1992) Emissions of some greenhouse gases from aquatic and semi-aquatic ecosystems in the Netherlands and opitons to control them. Sci Tot Env 126:277–293Google Scholar
- Van Oene H, Burgerhart N, Berendse F (2001) Inundation of reclaimed fen areas reduces greenhouse gas emissions and creates new nature reserves. Change 59:12–14Google Scholar
- Verhoeven JTA (1992) Fens and bogs in The Netherlands, vegetation, history, nutrient dynamics and conservation. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Geobotany 18Google Scholar
- Walter KM, Chanton JP, Chapin III FS, Schuur EAG, Zimov SA (2008) Methane production and bubble emissions from arctic lakes: isotopic implications for source pathways and ages. Journal of Geophysical Research 113:G00A089Google Scholar
- Wilson D, Alm J, Laine J, Byrne KA, Farrell EP, Tuittila E-S (2008) Rewetting of cutaway peatlands: are we re-creating hot spots of methane emissions? Restor Ecol 7:796–806Google Scholar