Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 229–237 | Cite as

Variability of Albedo and Utility of the MODIS Albedo Product in Forested Wetlands

  • David M. SumnerEmail author
  • Qinglong Wu
  • Chandra S. Pathak
Article

Abstract

Albedo was monitored over a two-year period (beginning April 2008) at three forested wetland sites in Florida, USA using up- and down-ward facing pyranometers. Water level, above and below land surface, is the primary control on the temporal variability of daily albedo. Relatively low reflectivity of water accounts for the observed reductions in albedo with increased inundation of the forest floor. Enhanced canopy shading of the forest floor was responsible for lower sensitivity of albedo to water level at the most dense forest site. At one site, the most dramatic reduction in daily albedo was observed during the inundation of a highly-reflective, calcareous periphyton-covered land surface. Satellite-based Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) estimates of albedo compare favorably with measured albedo. Use of MODIS albedo values in net radiation computations introduced a root mean squared error of less than 4.7 W/m2 and a mean, annual bias of less than 2.3 W/m2 (1.7%). These results suggest that MODIS-estimated albedo values can reliably be used to capture areal and temporal variations in albedo that are important to the surface energy balance.

Keywords

Net radiation Remote sensing Big Cypress National Preserve 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledgement the useful review comments of W. Barclay Shoemaker and Amy Swancar of the U. S. Geological Survey, the Associate Editor, and three anonymous reviewers.

Use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government or the South Florida Water Management District.

References

  1. Betts AK, Ball JH (1997) Albedo over the boreal forest. Journal of Geophysical Research 102:28901–28909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brutsaert W (1982) Evaporation into the atmosphere—theory, history, and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen J, KT PU, Ustin SL, Suchanek TH, Bond BJ, Brosofske KD, Falk M (2004) Net ecosystem exchanges of carbon, water, and energy in young and old-growth Douglas-Fir forests. Ecosystems 7:534–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coakley JA (2002) Reflectance and albedo, surface. In: Holton JR, Curry JA, Pyle JA (eds) Encyclopedia of the atmospheric sciences. Academic Press, pp 1914–1923Google Scholar
  5. Disney M, Lewis P, Thackrah G, Quaife T, Barnsley M (2004) Comparison of MODIS broadband albedo over an agricultural site with ground measurements and values derived from Earth observation data at a range of spatial scales. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25:5297–5317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henderson-Sellers A, Wilson MF (1983) Surface albedo for climate modeling. Reviews of Geophysics 21:1743–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacobs J, Mecikalski J, and Paech S (2008) Satellite-based solar radiation, net radiation, and potential and reference evapotranspiration estimates over Florida. http://hdwp.er.usgs.gov/ET/GOES_FinalReport.pdf. Accessed 21 January 2011
  8. Jin Y, Schaaf CB, Woodstock CE, Gao F, Li X, Strahler AH, Lucht W, Liang S (2003) Consistency of MODIS surface bidirectional reflectance distribution function and albedo retrievals: 2. Validation. Journal of Geophysical Research. doi: 10.1029/2002JD002804 Google Scholar
  9. Justice CO, Townshend JRG, Vermote EF, Masuoka E, Wolfe RE, Saleous N, Roy DP, Morisette JT (2002) An overview of MODIS land data processing and product status. Remote Sensing of Environment 83:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim J, Verma SB (1996) Surface exchange of water vapour between an open sphagnum fen and the atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 79:234–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kimes DS, Sellers PJ, Newcomb WW (1987) Hemispherical reflectance variations of vegetation canopies and implications for global and regional energy budget studies. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 26:959–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lafleur PM (2008) Connecting atmosphere and wetland: energy and water vapour exchange. Geography Compass 2:1027–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liang S, Strahler AH, Walthall C (1999) Retrieval of land surface albedo from satellite observations: a simulation study. Journal of Applied Meteorology 38:712–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu J, Schaaf C, Strahler A, Jiao Z, Shuai Y, Zhang Q, Roman M, Augustine JA, Dutton EG (2009) Validation of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) albedo retrieval algorithm: Dependence of albedo on solar zenith angle. Journal of Geophysical Research. doi: 10.1029/2008JD009969 Google Scholar
  15. Minnis P, Mayor S, Smith WL, Young DF (1997) Asymmetry in the diurnal variation of surface albedo. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35:879–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Myhre G, Myhre A (2003) Uncertainties in radiative forcing due to surface albedo changes caused by land-use changes. Journal of Climate 16:1511–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center (ORNL DAAC) (2010) MODIS subsetted land products, Collection 5. http://daac.ornl.gov/MODIS/modis.html. Accessed 21 January 2011
  18. Pielke RA, Rodriguez JH, Eastman JL, Walko RL, Stocker RA (1993) Influence of albedo variability in complex terrain on mesocale systems. Journal of Climate 6:1798–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salomon JG, Schaaf CB, Strahler AH, Gao F, Jin Y (2006) Validation of the MODIS bidirectional reflectance distribution function and albedo retrievals using combined observations from the Aqua and Terra platforms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.871564 Google Scholar
  20. Salomonson VV, Barnes W, Masuoka EJ (2006) Introduction to MODIS and an overview of associated activities. In: Qu JJ, Gao W, Kafatos M, Murphy RE, Salomonson VV (eds) Earth science satellite remote sensing, vol 1. Tsinghua University Press, Berlin, pp 12–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sellers PJ (1995) Biophysical models of land surface processes. In: Trenberth KE (ed) Climate system modelling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 451–490Google Scholar
  22. Song J (1998) Diurnal asymmetry in surface albedo. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 92:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Strahler AH, Lucht W, Schaaf CB, Tsang T, Gao F, Xiaowen L, Muller JP, Lewis P, Barnsley MJ (1999) MODIS BRDF/albedo product: algorithm theoretical basis documentation. Version 5.0. http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/atbd/atbd_mod09.pdf. Accessed 21 January 2011
  24. Twine TE, Kucharik CJ, Foley JA (2004) Effects of land cover change on the energy and water balance of the Mississippi River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology 5:640–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. USGS (2010a) United States Geological Survey Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/lpdaac/products/modis_products_table. Accessed 21 January 2011
  26. USGS (2010b) United States Geological Survey Florida Water Science Center Hydrologic Data Portal. http://hdwp.er.usgs.gov/. Accessed 21 January 2011
  27. Wang K, Liu J, Zhou X, Sparrow M, Ma M, Sun Z, Jiang W (2004) Validation of the MODIS global land surface albedo product using ground measurements in a semidesert region on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research. doi: 10.1029/2003JD004229 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Sumner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qinglong Wu
    • 2
  • Chandra S. Pathak
    • 2
  1. 1.US Geological SurveyOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.South Florida Water Management DistrictWest Palm BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations