Landscape Context Predicts Reed Canarygrass Invasion: Implications for Management
- 197 Downloads
Understanding the landscape distribution of invasive species has become an important tool to help land managers focus their efforts. We used land cover data to predict the proportion of wetlands in a watershed dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.), one of the most dominant wetland invaders in North America over the past century. Our results indicated that the landscape configuration of a watershed was a better predictor than the landscape composition of a watershed, with the adjacency of wetlands to agriculture and open water identified as the best predictors of the proportion of wetlands in a watershed dominated by reed canarygrass. In contrast, proportion of agriculture and open water were identified as the next best predictors in our regression tree, but explained significantly less variability. These results suggest that the risk of invasion by reed canarygrass varies among watersheds, and further that the potential for restoration success may similarly vary across the landscape. We argue that it is essential to understand the landscape context of a wetland before attempting a restoration project because success may be mediated by factors outside the local site.
KeywordsHabitat models Invasive species Nutrient management Phalaris arundinacea Restoration Wetlands
Thanks to Monica Turner, whose landscape ecology class inspired this project. Thanks to Tom Bernthal, Kevin Willis, and the Wisconsin DNR for the use of their data. Finally, thanks to several anonymous reviewers whose suggestions greatly improved the manuscript.
- Babbitt B (1998) Statement by Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt on invasive alien species. ‘Science in Wildlife Weed Management’ Symposium, Denver, CO, April 8, 1998. U.S. Dept. of the Interior News Release. (http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/pubs/bbstat.htm)
- Bernthal TW, Willis KG (2004) Using LANDSAT 7 Imagery to map invasive Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) A landscape level wetland monitoring methodology. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources PUB-SS-992Google Scholar
- Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CG (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
- Lass LW, Prather TS, Glenn NF, Weber KT, Mundt JT, Pettingill J (2005) A review of remote sensing of invasive weeds and example of the early detection of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) and babysbreath (Gypsophila paniculata) with a hyperspectral sensor. Weed Science 53:242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayo Foundation (2002) RPART3 for S-PLUS 6 for Windows. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Rochester, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
- McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) Fragstats: spatial analysis program for categorical mapsGoogle Scholar
- Merigliano MF, Lesica P (1998) The native status of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the Inland Northwest, USA. Natural Areas Journal 18:223–230Google Scholar
- Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) (2000) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Rice JS, Pinkerton BW (1993) Reed canarygrass survival under cyclic inundation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48:132–132Google Scholar
- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (1984–1996) Wisconsin Wetlands Inventory. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar