, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 200–210 | Cite as

Primary Productivity in 20-year Old Created Wetlands in Southwestern Virginia

  • Robert B. Atkinson
  • James E. Perry
  • Gregory B. Noe
  • W. Lee Daniels
  • John CairnsJr.
Original Paper


Thousands of depressional wetlands accidentally formed as a result of pre-1977 contour coal mining in the Appalachian Mountains. Eleven 20-yr old sites were found in a watershed that did not receive acid mine drainage. The purpose of this study was to quantify and model above- and below-ground plant biomass in these created wetlands and to evaluate functional development. Sampling was stratified by weighted average of two plant communities, which corresponded to shallower and deeper water levels, facultative wetland and obligate wetland communities, respectively. In 1994, peak above-ground biomass averaged 473.7 g m−2 in the facultative wetland community and 409.5 g m−2 in the obligate wetland community. Scirpus cyperinus exhibited the highest peak above-ground biomass (51.8% of total biomass) and Typha latifolia ranked second. Canonical correspondence analysis detected positive effects of longer soil exposure to the atmosphere and greater sediment depth on above-ground biomass at the site (wetland ecosystem) level. Within communities, forward stepwise regression identified positive association of above-ground biomass with water soluble reactive P, water soluble NH3, decomposition rate over 507 d, live S. cyperinus tissue P content, and sediment depth. When these results are combined with prior studies conducted at the same 20-yr old sites, it appears that both structural and functional development has been arrested at a somewhat immature state resulting primarily from soil and hydrologic factors.


Functional performance Nutrient limitation Peak standing crop Tissue nutrient content 



Katie Haering, Velva Groover, W.T. Price, Colin Rosenquist, David Jones, and Barbara Niederlehner provided field and laboratory assistance, Darla Donald provided editorial assistance, and Barbara Falls and Teresa Moody also provided help. We gratefully acknowledge the support of Vann Weaver and the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. The efforts of four anonymous reviewers were appreciated.


  1. Anderson CJ, Cowell BC (2004) Mulching effects on the seasonally flooded zone of West-Central Florida, USA Wetlands. Wetlands 24:811–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson CJ, Mitsch WJ (2005) Effect of pulsing on macrophyte productivity and nutrient uptake: a wetland mesocosm experiment. American Midland Naturalist 154:305–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson CJ, Mitsch WJ (2006) Sediment, carbon, and nutrient accumulation at two 10-year-old created riverine marshes. Wetlands 26:779–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. APHA (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson RB, Cairns J Jr (2001) Plant decomposition and litter accumulation in depressional wetlands: functional performance of two wetland age classes that were created via excavation. Wetlands 21:354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkinson RB, Perry JE, Smith EP, Cairns J Jr (1993) Use of created wetland delineation and weighted averages as a component of assessment. Wetlands 13:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atkinson RB, Perry JE, Cairns J Jr (2005) Vegetative communities of 20-year old created depressional wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13:469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Auclair AND, Bouchard A, Pajaczkowski J (1976) Plant standing crop and productivity relations in a Scirpus-Equisetum wetland. Ecology 57:941–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bailey DE, Perry JE, Daniels WE (2007) Vegetation dynamics in response to an organic matter loading experiment in a created freshwater wetland in southeastern Virginia. Wetlands 27:936–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnes LE (1983) The colonization of ball-clay ponds by macroinvertebrates and macrophytes. Freshwater Biology 13:561–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bedford BL, Walbridge MR, Aldous A (1999) Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80:2151–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Belcher JW, Keddy PA, Twolan-Strutt L (1995) Root and shoot competition intensity along a soil depth gradient. Journal of Ecology 83:673–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bishel-Machung L, Brooks RP, Yates SS, Hoover KL (1996) Soil properties of reference wetlands and wetland creation projects in Pennsylvania. Wetlands 16:532–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boyd CE, Hess LW (1970) Factors influencing shoot production and mineral nutrient levels in Typha latifolia. Ecology 51:296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Agronomy 9: methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, pp 595–624Google Scholar
  17. Brinson MM, Lugo AE, Brown S (1981) Primary productivity, decomposition and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands. Annual Review of Ecology Systems 12:123–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ChangTing W, GuangMin C, QiLan W, ZengChun J, LuMing D, RuiJun L (2008) Changes in plant biomass and species composition of alpine Kobresia meadows along altitudinal gradient on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Science in China Series C: Life Sciences 51:86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole CA (1992) Wetland vegetation ecology on a reclaimed coal surface mine in southern Illinois. Wetlands Ecology and Management 2:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, Laroe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, DC, FWS/OBS-79/31Google Scholar
  21. Daniels WL, Amos DF (1982) Chemical characteristics of some Southwest Virginia minesoils. In: Graves GH (ed) Symposium on surface mining, hydrology, sedimentology, and reclamation. Office of Engineering Services, Lexington, pp 377–380Google Scholar
  22. de la Cruz A (1978) Primary production processes: summary and recommendations. In: Good RE, Whigham DF, Simpson RL (eds) Freshwater wetlands: ecological processes and management potential. Academic, New York, pp 79–86Google Scholar
  23. DeBerry DA, Perry JE (2004) Primary succession in a created freshwater wetland. Castanea 69:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dickerman JA, Stewart AJ, Wetzel RG (1986) Estimates of net annual aboveground production: sensitivity to sampling frequency. Ecology 67:650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Doumlele DG (1981) Primary production and seasonal aspects of emergent plants in a tidal freshwater marsh. Estuaries 4:139–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Emery SL, Perry JA (1995) Aboveground biomass and phosphorus concentrations of Lythrum salicaria (Purple Loosestrife) and Typha spp. (Cattail) in 12 Minnesota wetlands. American Midland Naturalist 134:394–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garver EG, Dubbe DR, Pratt DC (1988) Seasonal patterns in accumulation and partitioning of biomass and macronutrients in Typha spp. Aquatic Botany 32:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Güsewell S, Koerselman W, Verhoeven JTA (2003) Biomass N:P ratios as indicators of nutrient limitations for plant populations in wetlands. Ecological Applications 13:372–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill BH (1987) Typha productivity in a Texas pond. Aquatic Botany 27:385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hogan DM, Jordan TE, Walbridge MR (2004) Phosphorus retention and soil organic carbon in restored and natural freshwater wetlands. Wetlands 24:573–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holl KD, Cairns J Jr (1994) Vegetational community development on reclaimed coal surface mines in Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 121:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setäla H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75:3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kao JT, Titus JE, Zhu W (2003) Differential nitrogen and phosphorus retention by five wetland plant species. Wetlands 23:979–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirkman LK, Goebel PC, West L, Drew MB, Palik BJ (2000) Depressional wetland vegetation types: a question of plant community development. Wetlands 20:373–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klopatek JM, Stearns FW (1978) Primary productivity of emergent macrophytes in a Wisconsin freshwater marsh ecosystem. American Midland Naturalist 100:320–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koerselman W, Mueleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langis R, Zalejko M, Zedler JB (1991) Nitrogen assessments in a constructed and a natural salt marsh of San Diego Bay. Ecological Applications 1:40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li RS, Daniels WL (1994) Nitrogen accumulation and form over time in young mine spoils. Journal of Environmental Quality 23:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  40. Nair VD, Graetz DA, Reddy KR, Olila OG (2001) Soil development in phosphate-mined created wetlands of Florida, USA. Wetlands 21:232–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neill C (1990) Effects of nutrients and water levels on emergent macrophyte biomass in a prairie marsh. Canadian Journal of Botany 68:1007–1014Google Scholar
  42. Nygaard B, Ejrnaes R (2009) The impact of hydrology and nutrients on species composition and richness. Wetlands 29:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Odum EP (1989) Wetland values in retrospect. In: Sharitz RR, Gibbons JW (eds) Freshwater wetlands and wildlife. Symposium Series Number 61. U.S.DOE, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  45. Olde Venterink H, Wassen MJ, Verkroost AWM, De Ruiter PC (2003) Species richness-productivity patterns differ between N-, P-, and K-limited wetlands. Ecology 84:2191–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy Monograph Number 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 403–430Google Scholar
  47. Reed PB Jr (1988) National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Southeast (Region 2). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, Biological Report 88 (24)Google Scholar
  48. Sather HJ, Smith RD (1984) An overview of major wetland functions and values. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-84/18Google Scholar
  49. Schalles JF, Shure DJ (1989) Hydrology, community structure and productivity patterns of a dystrophic Carolina Bay wetland. Ecological Monographs 59:365–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seabloom EW, van der Valk AG (2003) The development of vegetative zonation patterns in restored prairie pothole wetlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shaffer PW, Ernst TL (1999) Distribution of soil organic matter in freshwater emergent/open water wetlands in the Portland, Oregon Metropolitan area. Wetlands 19:505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stewart RE, Kantrud HA (1971) Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. U.S. Fish Wildlife Service, Research Publication 92Google Scholar
  53. USDA, NASS (2009) Virginia statistics. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Virginia/Publications/County_Estimates/wise.pdf. Accessed on 29 May 2009
  54. USDA, NRCS (2009) The PLANTS Database. http://plants.usda.gov/. Accessed 23 May 2009
  55. USDC, NCDC (2009) National Climatic Data Center, http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html. Accessed 15 May 2009
  56. Weltzin JF, Keller JK, Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Allen PB, Chen J (2005) Litter controls plant community composition in a northern fen. Oikos 110:537–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wentworth TR, Johnson GP, Kologiski RL (1988) Designation of wetlands by weighted averages of vegetation data: a preliminary evaluation. Water Resources Bulletin 24:389–396Google Scholar
  58. Westlake DF (1963) Comparisons of plant productivity. Biological Review 38:385–425Google Scholar
  59. Whigham D, Pittek M, Hofmockel KH, Jordan T, Pepin AL (2002) Biomass and nutrient dynamics in restored wetlands on the outer coastal plain of Maryland, USA. Wetlands 22:562–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Woo I, Zedler JB (2002) Can nutrients alone shift a sedge meadow towards dominance by the invasive Typha × glauca? Wetlands 22:509–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert B. Atkinson
    • 1
    • 5
  • James E. Perry
    • 2
  • Gregory B. Noe
    • 3
  • W. Lee Daniels
    • 4
  • John CairnsJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Virginia Institute of Marine ScienceGloucester PointUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Geological Survey, 430 National CenterRestonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Crop Soil and Environmental ScienceVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  5. 5.Center for Wetland ConservationChristopher Newport UniversityNewport NewsUSA

Personalised recommendations