Controls of Suspended Sediment Concentration, Nutrient Content, and Transport in a Subtropical Wetland
Redistribution of largely organic sediment from low elevation sloughs to higher elevation ridges is a leading hypothesis for the formation and maintenance of the native ridge and slough landscape pattern found in peat wetlands of the Florida Everglades. We tested this redistribution hypothesis by measuring the concentration and characteristics of suspended sediment and its associated nutrients in the flowpaths of adjacent ridge and slough plant communities. Over two wet seasons we found no sustained differences in suspended sediment mass concentrations, particle-associated P and N concentrations, or sizes of suspended particles between ridge and slough sites. Discharge of suspended sediment, particulate nutrients, and solutes were nearly double in the slough flowpath compared to the ridge flowpath due solely to deeper and faster water flow in sloughs. Spatial and temporal variations in suspended sediment were not related to water velocity, consistent with a hypothesis that the critical sheer stress causing entrainment is not commonly exceeded in the present-day managed Everglades. The uniformity in the concentrations and characteristics of suspended sediment at our research site suggests that sediment and particulate nutrient redistribution between ridges and sloughs does not occur, or rarely occurs, in the modern Everglades.
KeywordsEntrainment Everglades Nitrogen Particle Phosphorus
- Boto KG, Patrick WH Jr (1979) Role of wetlands in the removal of suspended sediment. In: Greeson PE, Clark JR, Clark JE (eds) Wetland functions and values: The state of our understanding. American Water Resources Association, Middleburg, pp 479–489Google Scholar
- Cahoon DR (2006) A review of major storm impacts on coastal wetland elevation. Estuaries and Coasts 29:889–898Google Scholar
- Chow-Fraser P (1999) Seasonal, interannual and spatial variability in the concentrations of total suspended solids in a degraded coastal wetland of Lake Ontario. Journal of Great Lakes Research 25:799–813Google Scholar
- Davis SM (1981) Mineral flux in the Boney Marsh, Kissimmee River. Mineral retention in relation to overland flow during the three-year period following reflooding. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm BeachGoogle Scholar
- Davis SM, Gunderson LH, Park WA, Richardson JR, Mattson JE (1994) Landscape dimension, composition, and function in a changing Everglades ecosystem. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: The ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie, Delray Beach, pp 419–444Google Scholar
- Froelich PN (1988) Kinetic control of dissolved phosphate in natural rivers and estuaries: a primer on the phosphate buffer mechanism. Limnology and Oceanography 33:649–668Google Scholar
- Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. Lewis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Leonard LA, Reed DJ (2002) Hydrodynamics and sediment transport through tidal marsh canopies. Journal of Coastal Research 36:459–469Google Scholar
- Light SS, Dineen JW (1994) Water control in the Everglades: a historical perspective. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: The ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie, Delray Beach, pp 47–84Google Scholar
- Phillips JD (1989) Fluvial sediment storage in wetlands. Water Resources Bulletin 25:867–873Google Scholar
- Schaffranek RW, Jenter HL (2001) Observations of daily temperature patterns in the southern Florida Everglades. In: Hayes DF (ed) Proceedings of the 2001 wetlands engineering & river restoration conference. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. doi: 10.1061/40581(2001)59.
- Science Coordination Team (2003) The role of flow in the Everglades ridge and slough landscape. South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Working Group. http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/sct_flows/index.html. Accessed 1 Dec 2005.
- Sklar F, McVoy C, VanZee R, Gawlik DE, Tarboton K, Rudnick D, Miao S, Armentano T (2002) The effects of altered hydrology on the ecology of the Everglades. In: Porter JW, Porter KG (eds) The Everglades, Florida Bay, and coral reefs of the Florida Keys: An ecosystem sourcebook. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 39–82Google Scholar
- Sklar FH, Chimney MJ, Newman S, McCormick P, Gawlik D, Miao S, McVoy C, Said W, Newman J, Coronado C, Crozier G, Korvela M, Rutchey K (2005) The ecological–societal underpinnings of Everglades restoration. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:161–169Google Scholar
- Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar