Cloud — Aerosol interaction during lightning activity over land and ocean: Precipitation pattern assessment
- 164 Downloads
The present study attempts to identify the land - ocean contrast in cloud - aerosol relation during lightning and non-lightning days and its effect on subsequent precipitation pattern. The thermal hypothesis in view of Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) behind the land - ocean contrast is observed to be insignificant in the present study region. The result shows that the lightning activities are significantly and positively correlated with aerosols over both land and ocean in case of low aerosol loading whereas for high aerosol loading the correlation is significant but, only over land. The study attempts to comprehend the mechanism through which the aerosol and lightning interact using the concept of aerosol indirect effect that includes the study of cloud effective radius, cloud fraction and precipitation rate. The result shows that the increase in lightning activity over ocean might have been caused due to the first aerosol indirect effect, while over land the aerosol indirect effect might have been suppressed due to lightning. Thus, depending on the region and relation between cloud parameters it is observed that the precipitation rate decreases (increases) over ocean during lightning (non-lightning) days. On the other hand during non-lightning days, the precipitation rate decreases over land.
Key wordsLightning aerosol land ocean precipitation rate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Christian, H. J., and Coauthors, 1999: Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed by the Optical Transient Detector (OTD). Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Atmos. Electricity, NASA, Guntersville, 726–729.Google Scholar
- Feingold, G., W. Eberhard, D. Veron, and M. Previdi, 2003: First measurements of the Twomey indirect effect using ground-based remote sensors. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1287, doi:10.1029/2002GL016633,2003.Google Scholar
- Kandalgaonkar, S. S., J. R. Kulkarni, M. I. R. Tinmaker, and M. K. Kulkarni, 2010: Land-ocean contrasts in lightning activity over the Indian region. Int. J. Climatol., 30, 137–145.Google Scholar
- Pinto, Jr. O., I. R. C. A. Pinto, and K. P. Naccarato, 2007: Maximum cloud to ground lightning flash densities observed by lightning location systems in the tropical region: A Review. Geophys. Res. Lett., 84, 189–200.Google Scholar
- Qie, X. S., C. M. Guo, M. H. Yan, and G. S. Zhang, 1993: Lightning data and study of thunderstorm nowcasting. Acta Meteorol. Sin., 7, 244–256.Google Scholar
- Rogers, R. R., and M. K. Yau, 1989: A Short Course in Cloud Physics. Pergamon Press, 304 pp.Google Scholar
- Snee, R. D., and C. G. Pfeifer, 2006: Histograms. Encyclopedia. Stat. Sci., doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess0952.pub2.Google Scholar
- Wilks, D., 2011: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. International Geophysics, Academic Press, 704 pp.Google Scholar
- Williams, E. R., D. Rosenfeld, N. Madden, C. Labrada, J. Gerlach, and L. Atkinson, 1999: The role of boundary layer aerosol in the vertical development of precipitation and electrification: another look at the contrast between lightning over land and over ocean. Preprints, 11th Int. Conf. Atmos. Electricity, Guntersville, AL, 754–757.Google Scholar
- Williams, E. R., and Coauthors, 2002: Contrasting convective regimes over the Amazon: implications for cloud electrification. J. Geophys. Res., 107, D20, doi:10.1029/2001JD000380.Google Scholar
- Yuan, T., L. A. Remer, K. E. Pickering, and H. Yu, 2011: Observational evidence of aerosol enhancement of lightning activity and convective invigoration. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L04701.Google Scholar