On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications

Article

Abstract

We estimate climate sensitivity from observations, using the deseasonalized fluctuations in sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and the concurrent fluctuations in the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) outgoing radiation from the ERBE (1985–1999) and CERES (2000–2008) satellite instruments. Distinct periods of warming and cooling in the SSTs were used to evaluate feedbacks. An earlier study (Lindzen and Choi, 2009) was subject to significant criticisms. The present paper is an expansion of the earlier paper where the various criticisms are taken into account. The present analysis accounts for the 72 day precession period for the ERBE satellite in a more appropriate manner than in the earlier paper. We develop a method to distinguish noise in the outgoing radiation as well as radiation changes that are forcing SST changes from those radiation changes that constitute feedbacks to changes in SST. We demonstrate that our new method does moderately well in distinguishing positive from negative feedbacks and in quantifying negative feedbacks. In contrast, we show that simple regression methods used by several existing papers generally exaggerate positive feedbacks and even show positive feedbacks when actual feedbacks are negative. We argue that feedbacks are largely concentrated in the tropics, and the tropical feedbacks can be adjusted to account for their impact on the globe as a whole. Indeed, we show that including all CERES data (not just from the tropics) leads to results similar to what are obtained for the tropics alone — though with more noise. We again find that the outgoing radiation resulting from SST fluctuations exceeds the zerofeedback response thus implying negative feedback. In contrast to this, the calculated TOA outgoing radiation fluxes from 11 atmospheric models forced by the observed SST are less than the zerofeedback response, consistent with the positive feedbacks that characterize these models. The results imply that the models are exaggerating climate sensitivity.

Key words

Climate sensitivity climate feedback cloud radiation satellite 

References

  1. Bates, R. (2011), Climate stability and Sensitivity in some simple conceptual models. Climate Dyn., Online First, DOI:10.1007/s00382-010-0966-0.Google Scholar
  2. Barkstrom, B. R. (1984) The Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 65, 1170–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charney, J. G., and Coauthors, 1979: Carbon dioxide and climate: a scientific assessment, National Research Council, Ad Hoc Study Group on Carbon Dioxide and Climate. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 22 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Chung, E.-S., B. J. Soden, and B. J. Sohn, 2010: Revisiting the determination of climate sensitivity from relationships between surface temperature and radiative fluxes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L10703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colman, R., 2003: A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models. Climate Dyn., 20, 865–873.Google Scholar
  6. Crowley, T. J., and G. R. North, 1991: Paleoclimatology. Oxford Univ Press, NY, 339 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Dessler, A. E., 2010: A determination of the cloud feedback from climate variations over the past decade. Science, 330, 1523–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Douglass, D. H., J. R. Christy, B. D. Pearson, and S. F. Singer, 2007: A comparison of tropical temperature trends with model predictions. Int. J. Climatol., 28, 1693–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forster, P. M., and J. M. Gregory, 2006: The climate sensitivity and its components diagnosed from Earth Radiation Budget data. J. Climate., 19, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ____, and K. E. Taylor, 2006: Climate forcing and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations. J. Climate, 19, 6181–6194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, J., and Coauthors, 1993: How sensitive is the world’s climate? Natl. Geogr. Res. Explor. 9, 142–158.Google Scholar
  12. Hartmann, D. L., 1994: Global physical climatology. Academic Press, 411 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Im, E, S. L. Durden, and C. Wu, 2005: Cloud profiling radar for the Cloudsat mission. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 20, 15–18.Google Scholar
  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.Google Scholar
  15. Kanamitsu, M, and Coauthors, 2002: NCEP/DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., 83, 1631–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindzen, R. S., A. Y. Hou, and B. F. Farrell, 1982: The role of convective model choice in calculating the climate impact of doubling CO2. J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1189–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ____, 1999: The Greenhouse Effect and its problems. Chapter 8 in Climate Policy After Kyoto (T.R. Gerholm, editor), Multi-Science Publishing Co., Brentwood, UK, 170 pp.Google Scholar
  18. ____, 1993: Climate dynamics and global change. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 26, 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ____, C. Giannitsis, 1998: On the climatic implications of volcanic cooling. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 5929–5941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ____, M.-D. Chou, and A. Y. Hou, 2001: Does the Earth have an adaptive infrared iris? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82, 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ____, 2007: Taking greenhouse warming seriously. Energy & Environment, 18, 937–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ____, and Y.-S. Choi, 2009: On the determination of climate feedbacks from ERBE data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L16705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Machiels and Deville, Numerical simulation of randomly forced turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys., 145, 246–279.Google Scholar
  24. Matthews, G, and Coauthors, 2005: “Compensation for spectral darkening of short wave optics occurring on the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System,” in Earth Observing Systems X, edited by James J. Butler, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 5882 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA) Article 588212.Google Scholar
  25. Murphy, D. M, and Coauthors, 2009: An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D17107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ____, 2010: Constraining climate sensitivity with linear fits to outgoing radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newman, M., P. D. Sardeshmukh, and C. Penland, 2009: How important is air-sea coupling in ENSO and MJO Evolution? J. Climate, 22, 2958–2977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pierrehumbert, R. T., 2009: Principles of planetary climate. Cambridge University Press, 688 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Roe, G. H., and M. B. Baker, 2007: Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable?. Science, 318, 629–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rondanelli, R., and R. S. Lindzen, 2008: Observed variations in convective precipitation fraction and stratiform area with sea surface temperature. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz, S. E., 2007: Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth’s climate system. J. Geophy. Res., 112, D24S05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ____, 2008: Reply to comments by G. Foster et al., R. Knutti et al., and N. Scafetta, on “Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth’s climate system”. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soden, B. J., D. L. Jackson, V. Ramaswamy, M. D. Schwarzkopf, and X. Huang, 2005: The radiative signature of upper tropospheric moistening. Science, 310, 841–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spencer R. W., and W. D. Braswell, 2010: On the diagnosis of radiative feedback in the presence of unknown radiative forcing. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D16109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trenberth, K. E., J. T. Fasullo, C. O’Dell, and T. Wong, 2010: Relationships between tropical sea surface temperature and top-of-atmosphere radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L03702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsushima, Y., A. Abe-Ouchi, and S. Manabe, 2005: Radiative damping of annual variation in global mean surface temperature: comparison between observed and simulated feedback. Clim. Dyn., 24(6): 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wielicki, B. A, and Coauthors, 1998: Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES): Algorithm overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens., 36, 1127–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wong, T, and Coauthors, 2006: Reexamination of the observed decadal variability of the earth radiation budget using altitude-corrected ERBE/ ERBS nonscanner WFOV Data. J. Climate, 19, 4028–4040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Webb, M. J, and Coauthors, 2006: On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles. Clim. Dyn. 27, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Winker, D. M., W. H. Hunt, and M. J. McGill, 2007: Initial performance assessment of CALIOP. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, D. F, and Coauthors, 1998: Temporal Interpolation Methods for the Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Experiment. J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 572–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Meteorological Society and Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program in Atmospheres, Oceans, and ClimateMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringEwha Womans UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations