Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 212–223 | Cite as

Dose and timing of text messages for increasing physical activity among pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial

  • Jennifer L. Huberty
  • Matthew P. Buman
  • Jenn A. Leiferman
  • Jessica Bushar
  • Eric B. Hekler
  • Marc A. Adams
Original Research


Text4baby (T4b), a free nation-wide mobile health information service, delivers health-related text messages (SMS) to pregnant women. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of physical activity (PA) specific SMS to improve PA in pregnant women (vs standard T4b) and the most effective dose/timing of PA-specific SMS to improve PA. Pregnant women (N = 80) were randomized to one of four groups that differed in frequency and time of SMS. The Fitbit™ Flex measured PA. Data were analyzed using mixed model analyses. There were no increases in PA regardless of frequency or time. Those that received six PA SMS/week had greater decreases in activity and greater increases in sedentary time. SMS may not be a “potent” enough strategy to improve PA. Future studies should explore a modified focus on behavior change (e.g., decrease sedentary activity, increase light activity) and incorporate SMS as part of a multi-level approach with other evidence-based strategies.


Mobile health Physical activity Pregnancy Women 



This work was supported by the Virginia G. Piper Charitable Trust. The authors would like to acknowledge Ryan Eckert, BS, Arizona State University for his contributions to the revisions of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors report that Ms. Jessica Bushar was an employee of the ZERO TO THREE one of the founding partners of Text4baby (the Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies operation of Text4baby was transitioned to ZERO TO THREE in 2015), at the time of this work and no other authors report any conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

“All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.”

Statement of funding sources

The Virginia G. Piper Charitable Trust provided funding in support of this work.

Statement of findings

These findings have not been reported elsewhere. Additionally, this manuscript is solely submitted to the journal of Translational Behavioral Medicine and is not simultaneously submitted elsewhere.

Statement of data control

The authors of this manuscript have full control of the data and agree to allow the journal of Translational Behavioral Medicine to review their data upon request.

Informed consent

All study participants were required to complete an informed consent prior to participating in the study. Animals were not included in this study.


  1. 1.
    Ferraro ZM, Gaudet L, Adamo KB. The potential impact of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012; 67: 99-110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hegaard HK, Pedersen BK, Bruun Nielsen B, Damm P. Leisure time physical activity during pregnancy and impact on gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, preterm delivery and birth weight: a review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 1290-1296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melzer K, Schutz Y, Soehnchen N, et al. Effects of recommended levels of physical activity on pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202(266): e1-266. e6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nascimento SL, Surita FG, Cecatti JG. Physical exercise during pregnancy: a systematic review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 24: 387-394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poyatos-León R, García-Hermoso A, Sanabria-Martínez G, Álvarez-Bueno C, Sánchez-López M, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Effects of exercise during pregnancy on mode of delivery: a meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mudd LM, Owe KM, Mottola MF, Pivarnik JM. Health benefits of physical activity during pregnancy: an international perspective. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45: 268-277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Artal R, O’Toole M. Guidelines of the American college of obstetricians and gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Br J Sports Med. 2003; 37: 6-12. discussion 12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion# 267: exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 171-173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory, Musculoskeletal, and Neuromotor Fitness in Apparently Healthy Adults: Guidance for Prescribing Exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2011;43Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaston A, Cramp A. Exercise during pregnancy: a review of patterns and determinants. J Sci Med Sport. 2011; 14: 299-305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huberty J, Buman M, Leiferman J, Rowedder L, Bushar J. Trajectory of physical activity during pregnancy. Prev Med. In review.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nascimento SL, Surita FG, Godoy AC, Kasawara KT, Morais SS. Physical activity patterns and factors related to exercise during pregnancy: a cross sectional study. PLoS One. 2015; 10, e0128953.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Campbell F, Johnson M, Messina J, Guillaume L, Goyder E. Behavioural interventions for weight management in pregnancy: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative data. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 491.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang M, Nitzke S, Guilford E, Adair CH, Hazard DL. Motivators and barriers to healthful eating and physical activity among low-income overweight and obese mothers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008; 108: 1023-1028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huberty J, Dinkel D, Beets MW, Coleman J. Describing the use of the internet for health, physical activity, and nutrition information in pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2013; 17: 1363-1372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szwajcer EM, Hiddink GJ, Maas L, Koelen MA, van Woerkum CM. Nutrition-related information-seeking behaviours of women trying to conceive and pregnant women: evidence for the life course perspective. Fam Pract. 2008; 25(Suppl 1): i99-104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Obstet Gynecol (New York 1953). 2015; 126: e135-142.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stengel MR, Kraschnewski JL, Hwang SW, Kjerulff KH, Chuang CH. “What my doctor didn’t tell me”: examining health care provider advice to overweight and obese pregnant women on gestational weight gain and physical activity. Womens Health Issues. 2012; 22: e535-e540.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Furness PJ, McSeveny K, Arden MA, Garland C, Dearden AM, Soltani H. Maternal obesity support services: a qualitative study of the perspectives of women and midwives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011; 11: 69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leiferman J, Sinatra E, Huberty J. Pregnant Women’s Perceptions of Patient-Provider Communication for Health Behavior Change during Pregnancy. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;2014.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kieffer EC, Willis SK, Arellano N, Guzman R. Perspectives of pregnant and postpartum latino women on diabetes, physical activity, and health. Health Educ Behav. 2002; 29: 542-556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yan AF, Stevens P, Wang Y, et al. mHealth text messaging for physical activity promotion in college students: a formative participatory approach. Am J Health Behav. 2015; 39: 395-408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith A. US Smartphone Use in 2015.Pew Research Center. 2015.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fjeldsoe B, Miller YD, Marshall AL. Text messaging interventions for chronic disease management and health promotion. eHealth Applications: Promising Strategies for Health Behavior Change. 2012:167-186.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Demiris G, Afrin LB, Speedie S, et al. Patient-centered applications: use of information technology to promote disease management and wellness. A white paper by the AMIA knowledge in motion working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 15: 8-13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Buchholz SW, Wilbur J, Ingram D, Fogg L. Physical activity text messaging interventions in adults: a systematic review. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2013; 10: 163-173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Promoting Maternal and Child Health Through Health Text Messaging: An Evaluation of the Text4baby Program - Final Report. 2015.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Evans WD, Wallace Bihm J, Szekely D, et al. Initial outcomes from a 4-week follow-up study of the Text4baby program in the military women’s population: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16, e131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jordan ET, Bushar JA, Kendrick JS, Johnson P, Wang J. Encouraging influenza vaccination among Text4baby pregnant women and mothers. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49: 563-572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Bell R, Tennant PWG, McParlin C, et al. Measuring physical activity in pregnancy: a comparison of accelerometry and self-completion questionnaires in overweight and obese women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 170: 90-95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee report. 2008: to the secretary of health and human services. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; 2008.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aaron D, Kriska A. Modifiable activity questionnaire for adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29: 79-82.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Evans W, Nielsen PE, Szekely DR, et al. Dose-response effects of the text4baby mobile health program: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015; 3, e12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    National Healthy Mothers, Health Babies Coalition. Available at:
  36. 36.
    Whittaker R, Matoff-Stepp S, Meehan J, et al. Text4baby: development and implementation of a national text messaging health information service. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 2207-2213.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Huberty J, Rowedder L, Hekler E, et al. Development and design of an intervention to improve physical activity in pregnant women using Text4baby. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 1-10.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50: 248-287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rovniak LS, Anderson ES, Winett RA, Stephens RS. Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: a prospective structural equation analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2002; 24: 149-156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Health On the Net Foundation. The HON Code of Conduct for medical and health Web sites. 2009.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Patel MS, Burwick HA, Case MA, Volpp KG. Accuracy of Smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. JAMA. 2015; 313: 625-626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Takacs J, Pollock CL, Guenther JR, Bahar M, Napier C, Hunt MA. Validation of the fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. J Sci Med Sport. 2014; 17: 496-500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ainsworth B, Haskell W, Herrmann S, et al. The Compendium of Physical Activities Tracking Guide; Healthy Lifestyles Research Center, College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University. Available at:
  44. 44.
    Help Article: What are active minutes? Fitbit Web site. Available at: 2015.
  45. 45.
    Network SBR. Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012; 37: 540-542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Raudenbush SW, Xiao-Feng L. Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychol Methods. 2001; 6: 387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pearce EE, Evenson KR, Downs DS, Steckler A. Strategies to promote physical activity during pregnancy. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2013; 7: 38-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pearce EE, Evenson KR, Downs DS, Steckler A. Strategies to Promote Physical Activity During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Intervention Evidence. American journal of lifestyle medicine. 2013;7.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Evenson KR, Savitz A, Huston SL. Leisure‐time physical activity among pregnant women in the US. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004; 18: 400-407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Leiferman J, Swibas T, Koiness K, Marshall JA, Dunn AL. My baby, my move: examination of perceived barriers and motivating factors related to antenatal physical activity. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011; 56: 33-40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Evenson KR, Moos M, Carrier K, Siega-Riz AM. Perceived barriers to physical activity among pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2009; 13: 364-375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Adams MA, Sallis JF, Norman GJ, Hovell MF, Hekler EB, Perata E. An adaptive physical activity intervention for overweight adults: a randomized controlled trial. 2013.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Silva P, Alves O, Abreu S, et al. Impact of compliance with different guidelines on physical activity during pregnancy and perceived barriers to leisure physical activity. J Sports Sci. 2014; 32: 1398-1408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Poorman E, Gazmararian J, Parker RM, Yang B, Elon L. Use of text messaging for maternal and infant health: a systematic review of the literature. Matern Child Health J. 2015; 19: 969-989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Evans WD, Wallace JL, Snider J. Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 1031.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schwerdtfeger AR, Schmitz C, Warken M. Using text messages to bridge the intention-behavior gap? A pilot study on the use of text message reminders to increase objectively assessed physical activity in daily life. Frontiers in psychology. 2012;3Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hovell M, Wahlgren D, Adams M. The logical and empirical basis for the behavioral ecological model. Emerging Theor Health Promot Prac Res. 2009; 2: 347-385.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Eyler AA. Personal, social, and environmental correlates of physical activity in rural Midwestern white women. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 25: 86-92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Eyler AA, Matson-Koffman D, Young DR, et al. Quantitative study of correlates of physical activity in women from diverse racial/ethnic groups: the Women’s cardiovascular health network project summary and conclusions. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 25: 93-103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Joseph RP, Keller C, Adams MA, Ainsworth BE. Print versus a culturally-relevant facebook and text message delivered intervention to promote physical activity in African American women: a randomized pilot trial. BMC Womens Health. 2015; 15: 30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Huberty
    • 1
  • Matthew P. Buman
    • 1
  • Jenn A. Leiferman
    • 2
  • Jessica Bushar
    • 3
  • Eric B. Hekler
    • 4
  • Marc A. Adams
    • 1
  1. 1.Exercise Science and Health PromotionArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA
  2. 2.Department of Community and Behavioral Health Colorado School of Public HealthUniversity of Colorado DenverAuroraUSA
  3. 3.ZERO TO THREE Text 4 babyWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Nutrition and Health PromotionArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations