Advertisement

Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 16–27 | Cite as

UWALK: the development of a multi-strategy, community-wide physical activity program

  • Cally A. Jennings
  • Tanya R. Berry
  • Valerie Carson
  • S. Nicole Culos-Reed
  • Mitch J. Duncan
  • Christina C. Loitz
  • Gavin R. McCormack
  • Tara-Leigh F. McHugh
  • John C. Spence
  • Jeff K. Vallance
  • W. Kerry Mummery
Original Research

Abstract

UWALK is a multi-strategy, multi-sector, theory-informed, community-wide approach using e and mHealth to promote physical activity in Alberta, Canada. The aim of UWALK is to promote physical activity, primarily via the accumulation of steps and flights of stairs, through a single over-arching brand. This paper describes the development of the UWALK program. A social ecological model and the social cognitive theory guided the development of key strategies, including the marketing and communication activities, establishing partnerships with key stakeholders, and e and mHealth programs. The program promotes the use of physical activity monitoring devices to self-monitor physical activity. This includes pedometers, electronic devices, and smartphone applications. In addition to entering physical activity data manually, the e and mHealth program provides the function for objective data to be automatically uploaded from select electronic devices (Fitbit®, Garmin and the smartphone application Moves) The RE-AIM framework is used to guide the evaluation of UWALK. Funding for the program commenced in February 2013. The UWALK brand was introduced on April 12, 2013 with the official launch, including the UWALK website on September 20, 2013. This paper describes the development and evaluation framework of a physical activity promotion program. This program has the potential for population level dissemination and uptake of an ecologically valid physical activity promotion program that is evidence-based and theoretically framed.

Keywords

Physical activity Internet Community Evaluation Theory Health promotion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

UWALK is a program developed by the Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, in partnership with the Alberta Centre for Active Living and a multitude of partners. Funding has been provided by the Government of Alberta. We thank the UWALK team past and present for their valuable contribution to the success of the UWALK program. MJD is supported by a Future Leader Fellowship (ID 100029) from the National Heart Foundation of Australia. GRM and VC are supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health New Investigator Award. TB is supported by the Canada Research Chairs program. JV is supported by the Canada Research Chairs program and a Population Health Investigator Award from Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions.

Author contributions

CJ and KM were involved in the initial grant application, conception of UWALK, establishing the methods, data collection and questionnaires, and implementation and dissemination of the program. All authors participated in the program design, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva, WHO; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colley R, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig C, Clarke J, Tremblay M. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Stat Can. 2011; 22(1): 7–14.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bounajm F, Dinh T, Theriault L. Moving ahead: making the case for healthy active living in Canada. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada;2014.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Record NB, Onion DK, Prior RE, et al. Community-wide cardiovascular disease prevention programs and health outcomes in a rural county, 1970–2010. J Am Med Assoc. 2015; 313(2): 147–155.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker PR, Francis DP, Soares J, Weightman AL, Foster C. Community-wide interventions for increasing physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1: CD008366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008366.pub3
  6. 6.
    Spence JC, Lee RE. Toward a comprehensive model of physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003; 4(1): 7–24.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    World Health Organization. E-Health. 2015 [cited 2015 29 July]; Available from: http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story021/en/.
  8. 8.
    Wei J, Hollin I, Kachnowski S. A review of the use of mobile phone text messaging in clinical and healthy behaviour interventions. J Telemed Telecare. 2011; 17(1): 41–48.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown WJ, Eakin E, Mummery K, Trost SG. 10,000 Steps Rockhampton: establishing a multi-strategy physical activity promotion project in a community. Health Promot J Austr. 2003; 14(2): 95–100.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Cocker KA, De Bourdeaudhuij IM, Brown W, Cardon GM. Effects of “10,000 Steps Ghent” A whole-community intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(6): 455–463.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown WJ, Mummery K, Eakin E, Schofield G. 10,000 Steps Rockhampton: evaluation of a whole community approach to improving population levels of physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2006; 3(1): 1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goode AD, Eakin EG. Dissemination of an evidence-based telephone-delivered lifestyle intervention: factors associated with successful implementation and evaluation. Transl Behav Med. 2013; 3(4): 351–356.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gubbels JS, Mathisen FKS, Samdal O, et al. The assessment of ongoing community-based interventions to prevent obesity: lessons learned. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9): 1322–1327.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mummery WK, Schofield G, Hinchliffe A, Joyner K, Brown W. Dissemination of a community-based physical activity project: the case of 10,000 steps. J Sci Med Sport. 2006; 9(5): 424–430.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Statistics Canada. Focus on geography series, 2011 Consus, S. Canada, Editor. 2012: Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Government of Canada. Canadian Climate Normals 1981–2010 Station Data. 2015 [cited 2015 September, 10]; Available from: http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html?stnID=1865&lang=e&province=AB&provSubmit=go&page=26&dCode=1.
  18. 18.
    Paffenbarger RSJ, Hyde RT, Wing AL, Lee I-M, Jung DL, Kampert JB. The association of changes in physical-activity level and other lifestyle characteristics with mortality among men. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328(8): 538–545.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Behav. 1988; 15(4): 351–377.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998; 13(4): 623–649.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McAuley E, Szabo A, Gothe N, Olson EA. Self-efficacy: implications for physical activity, function, and functional limitations in older adults. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011:  10.1177/1559827610392704.
  23. 23.
    Grier S, Bryant CA. Social marketing in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005; 26(1): 319–339.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus Horiz. 2010; 53(1): 59–68.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hamm MP, Chisholm A, Shulhan J, et al. Social media use among patients and caregivers: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(5): e002819.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Balatsoukas P, Kennedy CM, Buchan I, Powell J, Ainsworth J. The role of social network technologies in online health promotion: a narrative review of theoretical and empirical factors influencing intervention effectiveness. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(6): e141.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schein R, Wilson K, Keelan JE. Literature review on effectiveness of the use of social media: a report for peel public health. 2011 [cited 2015 September 17]; Available from: https://www.peelregion.ca/health/resources/pdf/socialmedia.pdf.
  28. 28.
    Facebook Newsroom. Company Info. 2015 [cited 2015 September, 17]; Available from: http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/.
  29. 29.
    Twitter. Company. 2015 [cited 2015 September, 17]; Available from: https://about.twitter.com/company.
  30. 30.
    Sorensen, G., Emmons, K., Hunt, M. K., & Johnston, D. (1998). Implications of the results of community intervention trials. Annu Rev Public Health., 19(1), 379–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jennings CA, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione CM, Mummery WK. Effectiveness of a web-based physical activity intervention for adults with Type 2 diabetes—a randomised controlled trial. Prev Med. 2014; 60: 33–40.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Davies C, Corry K, Van Itallie A, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione C, Mummery WK. Prospective associations between intervention components and website engagement in a publicly available physical activity website: the case of 10,000 Steps Australia. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(1): e4.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davies C, Spence JC, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione CM, Mummery WK. Meta-analysis of Internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9(1): 52 .Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cugelman B. Gamification: what it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 1(1): e3.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Deterding S, Sicart M, Nacke L, O’Hara K, Dixon D. Gamification using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. in CHI’11 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM; 2011.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. Canadian physical activity guidelines Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines. 2012 [cited 2016 January 10]; Available from: http://www.csep.ca/cmfiles/guidelines/csep_guidelines_handbook.pdf.
  37. 37.
    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(9; SUPP/1): S498–S504.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tudor-Locke C, Hatano Y, Pangrazi RP, Kang M. Revisiting “how many steps are enough?”. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(7): S537.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE. The future of physical activity behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2004; 32(2): 57–63.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Caperchione CM, Duncan M, Kolt GS, et al. Examining an Australian physical activity and nutrition intervention using RE-AIM. Health Promot Int. 2016; 31(2): 450–458.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Berry TR, Spence JC, Plotnikoff RC, et al. A mixed methods evaluation of televised health promotion advertisements targeted at older adults. Eval Program Plann. 2009; 32(3): 278–288.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bauman A, Bowles HR, Huhman M, et al. Testing a hierarchy-of-effects model: pathways from awareness to outcomes in the VERB™ campaign 2002–2003. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34(6, Supplement): S249–S256.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Godin G, Shephard RJ. Godin leisure-time exercise questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29(6): S36–S38.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Craig C, Marshall A, Sjöström M, et al., and the IPAQ Consensus Group and the IPAQ Reliability and Validity Study Group. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35: 1381–1395.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Google. Google analytics. 2015; Available from: http://www.google.com/analytics.
  46. 46.
    Neuhaus M, Healy GN, Fjeldsoe BS, et al. Iterative development of Stand Up Australia: a multi-component intervention to reduce workplace sitting. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11(1) 21.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Baker PR, Francis DP. Cochrane review: community-wide interventions for increasing physical activity. J Evid-Based Med. 2015; 8(1): 57–58.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Statistics Canada. Residential telephone service survey, 2013. 2014 [cited 2016 11 January]; Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/140623/dq140623a-eng.htm.

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cally A. Jennings
    • 1
  • Tanya R. Berry
    • 1
  • Valerie Carson
    • 1
  • S. Nicole Culos-Reed
    • 2
  • Mitch J. Duncan
    • 3
  • Christina C. Loitz
    • 1
  • Gavin R. McCormack
    • 4
  • Tara-Leigh F. McHugh
    • 1
  • John C. Spence
    • 1
  • Jeff K. Vallance
    • 5
  • W. Kerry Mummery
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Physical Education and RecreationUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of KinesiologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.School of Medicine and Public Health; Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health and MedicineThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  5. 5.Faculty of Health DisciplinesAthabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada

Personalised recommendations