Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavioral research
- 804 Downloads
Adverse and suboptimal health behaviors and habits are responsible for approximately 40 % of preventable deaths, in addition to their unfavorable effects on quality of life and economics. Our current understanding of human behavior is largely based on static “snapshots” of human behavior, rather than ongoing, dynamic feedback loops of behavior in response to ever-changing biological, social, personal, and environmental states. This paper first discusses how new technologies (i.e., mobile sensors, smartphones, ubiquitous computing, and cloud-enabled processing/computing) and emerging systems modeling techniques enable the development of new, dynamic, and empirical models of human behavior that could facilitate just-in-time adaptive, scalable interventions. The paper then describes concrete steps to the creation of robust dynamic mathematical models of behavior including: (1) establishing “gold standard” measures, (2) the creation of a behavioral ontology for shared language and understanding tools that both enable dynamic theorizing across disciplines, (3) the development of data sharing resources, and (4) facilitating improved sharing of mathematical models and tools to support rapid aggregation of the models. We conclude with the discussion of what might be incorporated into a “knowledge commons,” which could help to bring together these disparate activities into a unified system and structure for organizing knowledge about behavior.
KeywordsMobile health mHealth Connected health Health-related behavior Just-in-time adaptive interventions Real-time interventions Computational models of behavior
This project was funded by the National Science Foundation (CISE IIS-1217464)
We would like to thank participants in the workshop that led to this publication: Jaakko Aarnio, Katerina Martin Abello, René van Bavel, Christina Botella, Niels Boye, Célia Boyer, Marientina Gotsis, Loukianos Gatzoulis, Ross Hammond, Jimi Huh, Holly Brugge Jimison, Pamela Kato, Outi Kenttä, Joni Kettunen, Pedrag Klasnja, Heidi Lehtonen, James Lester, Elina Mattila, Teresa Meneu, Robin Mermelstien, Hannu Nieminen, Ana Paiva, Brigitte Piniewski, Andrew Raij, and Petra Wilson.
Conflict of interest
Donna Spruijt-Metz, Eric Hekler, Niilo Saranummi, Stephen Intille, Ilkka Korhonen, Wendy Nilsen, Daniel E. Rivera, Bonnie Spring, Susan Michie, David A. Asch, Alberto Sanna, Vicente Traver Salcedo, Rita Kukakfa, and Misha Pavel have no conflict of interest to report.
Adherence to ethical principles
This paper reflects discussions and documents developed for the International Workshop on New Computationally-Enabled Theoretical Models to Support Health Behavior Change and Maintenance, October 16–17, 2012, Brussels. All materials can be found here http://www.behaviorchange.ca. There were no human subjects involved.
- 4.Keeney RL. Personal decisions are the leading cause of death, in Operations Research. 2008. p. 1335 + .Google Scholar
- 8.Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, HavilandML. Confirming “Truth”: more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Journal Information. 2004; 94(2).Google Scholar
- 10.Stamatakis KA et al. Where is obesity prevention on the map?: Distribution and predictors of local health department prevention activities in relation to county-level obesity prevalence in the United States. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2012; 18(5): 402-411.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rimer B, Glanz K. Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, Editor; 2005: 1-64.Google Scholar
- 17.Dickerson R, Gorlin E, Stankovic J. Empath: continuous emotional health monitoring system for major depression, in Wireless Health 2011. 2011: San Diego.Google Scholar
- 18.Annavaram M. et al. Multimodal sensing for pediatric obesity applications. in UrbanSense08. 2008. Raleigh.Google Scholar
- 26.Millikan RG. What is behavior? in the society for the philosophy of psychology, annual meeting, Toronto. 1987.Google Scholar
- 27.Lorenz, K., What is behavior? Species of mind: the philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. 1999: p. 39.Google Scholar
- 29.Kattsoff L. What is behavior? Philosophy and phenomenological research. 1948; p. 98–102.Google Scholar
- 30.Tuomisto MT, Parkkinen L. Defining behavior and environment interactions: translating and developing an experimental and applied behavior-analytic vocabulary in and to the national language. 2012; 97(3): p. 347–55.Google Scholar
- 33.Ramanathan, N., et al. Ohmage: an open mobile system for activity and experience sampling. 2012. IEEE.Google Scholar
- 34.Jaimes LG, Llofriu M, Raij A. A stress-free life: just-in-time interventions for stress via real-time forecasting and intervention adaptation. in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Body Area Networks. 2014. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering).Google Scholar
- 36.Dunton GF. et al. Locations of joint physical activity in parent-child pairs based on accelerometer and gps monitoring. Ann Behav Med. 2012.Google Scholar
- 39.Vathsangam H, Sukhatme G.S. Using phone-based activity monitors to promote physical activity in older adults: a pilot study. in Healthcare Innovation Conference (HIC), 2014 IEEE. 2014. IEEE.Google Scholar
- 40.Nahum-Shani I, Hekler E, Spruijt-Metz D. Building health behavior models to guide the development of just-in-time adaptive interventions: a pragmatic framework. Under Review. Google Scholar
- 41.Jimison H. et al. Models of cognitive performance based on home monitoring data. Proc. of EMBS’10, 2010.Google Scholar
- 45.Riley WT. et al. The development of a control systems model of social cognitive theory. Under review.Google Scholar
- 46.Lich KH. et al. A call to address complexity in prevention science research. Prev Sci, 2012: p. 1–11.Google Scholar
- 48.Timms KP. et al. Control systems engineering for understanding and optimizing smoking cessation interventions. in American Control Conference (ACC), 2013. 2013. IEEE.Google Scholar
- 49.Deshpande S. et al. A control engineering approach for designing an optimized treatment plan for fibromyalgia. in American Control Conference (ACC), 2011. 2011. IEEE.Google Scholar
- 50.Martın CA. et al. A dynamical systems model of social cognitive theory. in Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC’14). 2014.Google Scholar
- 52.Hammond RA, Dube L, A systems science perspective and transdisciplinary models for food and nutrition security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. in press.Google Scholar
- 53.Hammond RA, A complex systems approach to understanding and combating the obesity epidemic. 2008: Center on Social and Economic Dynamics. Google Scholar
- 54.Hammond RA. et al. A model of food reward learning with dynamic reward exposure. Frontiers in computational neuroscience. 2012. 6.Google Scholar
- 56.Dutech A, Scherrer B. Partially observable Markov decision processes. Markov Decision Processes in Artificial Intelligence. 2013; p. 185–228Google Scholar
- 57.Li L. et al. A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation. in Proceedings of The 19th International Conference On World Wide Web. 2010. ACM.Google Scholar
- 58.Bouneffouf D, Bouzeghoub A, Gançarski AL. Exploration/exploitation trade-off in mobile context-aware recommender systems, in AI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. 2012; Springer. p. 591–601.Google Scholar
- 59.Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. 2011; 1: 349.Google Scholar
- 60.Martin CA. et al. A dynamical systems model of social cognitive theory. in American Control Conference (ACC), 2014. 2014. IEEE.Google Scholar
- 61.Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. 2000, Norman Paul, Abraham Charles, Conner Mark (Eds). Understanding and changing health behaviour: from health beliefs to self-regulation. (2000).Google Scholar
- 62.Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
- 63.Bandura A. Self-efficacy—the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.Google Scholar
- 64.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Key Readings in Social Psychology. Baumeister Roy F (Ed). 1999.Google Scholar
- 66.Martin CA. et al. A dynamical systems model of social cognitive theory. Manuscript Submitted for Publication, 2013.Google Scholar
- 67.Riley WT. et al. The development of a control systems model of social cognitive theory. Manuscript Submitted for Publication 2013.Google Scholar
- 68.Philips, L.A., E.B. Hekler, and J. Abrams, Beyond context stability: motivational and self-identity mechanisms of exercise Habi. Under review.Google Scholar
- 70.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.Google Scholar
- 72.Vogel AL. et al. Pioneering the transdisciplinary team science approach: lessons learned from national cancer institute grantees. Journal of Translational Medicine Epidemiology. 2014; 2(2).Google Scholar
- 74.Pirolli P. Seeking answers, making sense, changing lifestyles: cognitive models of human-information interaction, in Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium. 2014, ACM: Regensburg, Germany. p. 2–3.Google Scholar
- 75.Hekler EB. et al. Mind the theoretical gap: interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2013. ACM.Google Scholar
- 76.Rahman MM. et al. Are we there yet?: Feasibility of continuous stress assessment via wireless physiological sensors. in Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics. 2014. ACM.Google Scholar
- 77.PhenX. PhenX. Consensus measures for phenotypes and exposures. 2013 [cited 2013; The PhenX Toolkit offers a web-based catalog of curated measures for consideration and inclusion in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and other large-scale genomic research efforts]. Available from: https://www.phenx.org.
- 78.Neuroscience Toolbox for cognitive functioning. 2013; Available from: http://www.neuroscienceblueprint.nih.gov/factSheet/toolbox.htm.
- 79.PROMIS. PROMIS: Dynamic tools to measure health outcomes from a patient perspective. 2013 [cited 2013; A system of highly reliable, precise measures of patient–reported health status for physical, mental, and social well–being.]. Available from: http://www.nihpromis.org.
- 80.Michie S. et al. ABC of Behaviour change theories. 2014Google Scholar
- 83.National Institutes of Health. BD2K. 2014; Available from: http://bd2k.nih.gov/-sthash.I1KoZCl6.dpuf
- 84.Hovell M, Wahlgren D, Adams M. The logical and empirical basis for the behavioral ecological model. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. 2009; 2: 347-385.Google Scholar
- 86.VPH-SHARE. VPH (Virtual Physiological Human)-Share Project. 2012 [cited 2012; Available from: http://www.vph-share.eu.
- 89.Wikpedia. Big Data. 2013; Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_data