Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 355–362 | Cite as

Varying social media post types differentially impacts engagement in a behavioral weight loss intervention

  • Sarah B. Hales
  • Charis Davidson
  • Gabrielle M. Turner-McGrievy
Original Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether different types of posts differentially affect participant engagement and if engagement with social media enhances weight loss. Data are a subanalysis from a randomized weight loss study with a 4-month follow-up support period via private Facebook groups and monthly meetings. Counselors posted five different post types/week based on social cognitive theory (weight-related, recipes, nutrition information, poll votes, or requests for suggestions). Types of participant engagement (likes, comments/poll votes, and views) were assessed. Poll votes were the most engaging (mean number of votes or comments/poll 14.6 ± 3.4, P < 0.01) followed by suggestions (9.1 ± 2.7 posts, P < 0.01) and weight-related posts (7.4 ± 3.1 posts, P < 0.01). Engagement with Facebook was significantly associated with weight loss during the 4-month maintenance period (B = −0.09, P = 0.04). The findings provide evidence for ways to provide social support during weight loss interventions using remote methodology.

Keywords

Social support Weight loss mHealth Social media eHealth 

References

  1. 1.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014; 311: 806-814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2003; 289 :76–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1999; 282: 1523-1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calle EE, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1625-1638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Key TJ, Reeves GK. Body Mass Index, Serum Sex Hormones, and Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95: 1218-1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nöthlings U, Wilkens LR, Murphy SP, Hankin JH, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN. Body mass index and physical activity as risk factors for pancreatic cancer: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2007; 18: 165-175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blackburn G. Effect of degree of weight loss on health benefits. Obes Res. 1995; 3: 211s-216s.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bensley RJ, Brusk JJ, Rivas J. Key principles in internet-based weight management systems. Am J Health Behav. 2010; 34: 206-213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pagoto S, Bennett GG. How behavioral science can advance digital health. Transl Behav Med. 2013; 3: 271-276.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Turner-McGrievy GM, Tate DF. Weight loss social support in 140 characters or less: use of an online social network in a remotely delivered weight loss intervention. Transl Behav Med. 2013; 3: 287-294.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang T, Chopra V, Zhang C, Woolford SJ. The role of social media in online weight management: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(11): e262.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teixeira PJ, Silva MN, Mata J, Palmeira AL, Markland D. Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 1-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soltani H, Furness PJ, Arden MA, McSeveny K, Garland C, Sustar H, et al. Women’s and Midwives’ Perspectives on the Design of a Text Messaging Support for Maternal Obesity Services: An Exploratory Study. J Obes. 2012; 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31: 143-164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bandura A. Social foundations of though and action: a social cognitive theory. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.; 1986.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderson-Bill ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR, Winett SG. Web-based guide to health: relationship of theoretical variables to change in physical activity, nutrition and weight at 16-months. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(1): e27.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eastin MS. Credibility Assessments of Online Health Information: The Effects of Source Expertise and Knowledge of Content. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 2001; 6: 0–0.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hu Y, Sundar SS. Effects of Online Health Sources on Credibility and Behavioral Intentions. Commun Res. 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turner-McGrievy GM, Davidson CR, Wilcox S. Does the type of weight loss diet affect who participates in a behavioral weight loss intervention? A comparison of participants for a plant-based diet versus a standard diet trial. Appetite. 2014; 73: 156-162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981; 34: 362–6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ludwig DS, Eckel RH. The glycemic index at 20 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 76.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Won JK. Scan and click: the uses and gratifications of social recommendation systems. Comput Hum Behav. 2014; 33: 184-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turner-McGrievy GM, Tate DF. Weight loss social support in 140 characters or less: use of an online social network in a remotely delivered weight loss intervention. Transl Behav Med. 2013.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hwang KO, Ottenbacher AJ, Green AP, Cannon-Diehl MR, Richardson O, Bernstam EV, et al. Social support in an Internet weight loss community. Int J Med Inf. 2010; 79.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gay G, Pollak J, Adams P, Leonard JP. Pilot study of aurora, a social, mobile-phone-based emotion sharing and recording system. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011; 5(2): 325-332.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clarke KK, Freeland-Graves J, Klohe-Lehman DM, Bohman TM. Predictors of weight loss in low-income mothers of young children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107: 1146-1154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hogan BE, Linden W, Najarian B. Social support interventions: do they work? Clin Psychol Rev. 2002; 22(3): 383-442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumanyika SK, Wadden TA, Shults J, Fassbender JE, Brown SD, Bowman MA, et al. Trial of family and friend support for weight loss in African American adults. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 1795–804.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah B. Hales
    • 1
  • Charis Davidson
    • 1
  • Gabrielle M. Turner-McGrievy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations