Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 108–116 | Cite as

Game playbooks: tools to guide multidisciplinary teams in developing videogame-based behavior change interventions

  • Lindsay R Duncan
  • Kimberly D Hieftje
  • Sabrina Culyba
  • Lynn E Fiellin
Practice Tool

ABSTRACT

As mobile technologies and videogaming platforms are becoming increasingly prevalent in the realm of health and healthcare, so are the opportunities to use these resources to conduct behavioral interventions. The creation and empirical testing of game style interventions, however, is challenged by the requisite collaboration of multidisciplinary teams, including researchers and game developers who have different cultures, terminologies, and standards of evidence. Thus, traditional intervention development tools such as logic models and intervention manuals may need to be augmented by creating what we have termed “Game Playbooks” which are intervention guidebooks that are created by, understood by, and acceptable to all members of the multidisciplinary game development team. The purpose of this paper is to describe the importance and content of a Game Playbook created to aide in the development of a videogame intervention designed specifically for health behavior change in young teens as well as the process for creating such a tool. We draw on the experience of our research and game design team to describe the critical components of the Game Playbook and the necessity of creating such a tool.

KEYWORDS

Videogame Behavior change Intervention manual Intervention 

References

  1. 1.
    Kirby, D. BDI logic models: a useful tool for designing, strengthening and evaluating programs to reduce adolescent sexual risk-taking, pregnancy, HIV and other STDs. 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dumas JE, Lynch AM, Laughlin JE, Smith EP, Prinz RJ. Promoting intervention fidelity: conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20: 38-47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santacroce SJ, Maccarelli LM, Grey M. Intervention fidelity. Nurs Res. 2004; 53: 63-66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carroll, K, Nuro, K. The use and development of treatment manuals. In: Carroll K. ed. Improving Compliance with Alcoholism Treatment. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1997: 55-72.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carroll KM. Manual-guided psychosocial treatment: a new virtual requirement for pharmacotherapy trials? Arch Gen Psychiat. 1997; 54: 923-928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Henggeler SW, Melton GB, Brondino MJ, Scherer DG, Hanley JH. Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: the role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. J Consult Clin Psych. 1997; 65: 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalichman SC, Belcher L, Cherry C, Williams EA. Primary prevention of sexually transmitted HIV infections: transferring behavioral research technology to community programs. J Primary Prev. 1997; 18: 149-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kato PM. Video games in health care: closing the gap. Rev Gen Psychol. 2010; 14: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brug J, Oenema A, Kroeze K, Raat H. The internet and nutrition education: challenges and opportunities. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 59: S130-S139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson CL, Bolen S, Brancati FL, Batts-Turner ML, Gary TL. A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 105-110.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norman GJ, Zaninski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yaroch AL, Atienza AA. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: 336-345.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lieberman D. Interactive video games for health promotion: effects on knowledge, self-efficacy, social support, and health. In: Street RL, Gold WR, Mannings T, eds. Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: Theoretical Applications and Future Directions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lieberman DA. Management of chronic pediatric diseases with interactive health games: theory and research findings. J Ambulatory Care Manag. 2001; 24: 26-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krishna S, Francisco BD, Balas EA, Konig P, Graff GR, Madsen RW. Internet-enabled interactive multimedia asthma education program: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2003; 111: 503-510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horan PP, Yarborough MC, Besigel G, Carlson DR. Computer-assisted self-control of diabetes by adolescents. Diabetes Educator. 1990; 16: 205-211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown SJ, Lieberman DA, Germeny BA, Fan YC, Wilson DM, Pasta DJ. Educational video game for juvenile diabetes: results of a controlled trial. Inform Health Soc Ca. 1997; 22: 77-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davis MA, Quittner AL, Stack CM, Yang MC. Controlled evaluation of the STARBRIGHT CD-ROM program for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004; 29: 259-267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kato PM, Cole SW, Bradlyn AS, Pollock BH. A video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2008; 122: e305-e317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark, D, Edmonds, C, Moore, A, Harlow, J, Allen, K, Winchester, WW, McCrickard, S, Estabrooks, P. Android application development to promote physical activity in adolescents. In International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS) 2012.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hieftje, K, Edelman, EJ, Camenga, DR, Fiellin, LE. Electronic media-based health interventions for behavior change in youth: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatrics. 167:574-580.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Primack BA, Carroll MV, McNamara, et al. Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: 630-638.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferguson, B. The emergence of games for health. Games for Health: Research, Development, and Clinical Applications. 2012; 1:1-2.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tarini P. Curiosity, hope, and vision: the role of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's pioneer portfolio in funding early health game researchGames for Health. Res Dev Clin Appl. 2012; 1: 7-8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thompson D, Baranowski T, Buday R, et al. Serious video games for health: how behavioral science guided the development of a serious video game. Simulat Gaming. 2010; 41: 587-606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Howell K. Games for Health Conference 2004: Issues, trends, and needs unique to games for health. CyberPsychol Behav. 2005; 8: 103-109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsay R Duncan
    • 1
    • 4
  • Kimberly D Hieftje
    • 2
    • 4
  • Sabrina Culyba
    • 3
  • Lynn E Fiellin
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Kinesiology and Physical EducationMcGill UniversityWest, MontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine, University School of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Schell GamesPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.play2PREVENT LabYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations