Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 124–126 | Cite as

Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: ban indoor tanning for minors

  • Sherry Pagoto
  • Joel Hillhouse
  • Carolyn J Heckman
  • Elliot J Coups
  • Jerod Stapleton
  • David Buller
  • Rob Turrisi
  • June Robinson
  • Alan C Geller
Practice and Public Health Policies

ABSTRACT

The Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM), an interdisciplinary professional organization focused on the science of health behavior joins the American Academy of Dermatology, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a host of other national and international organizations in support of a total ban on indoor tanning for minors under the age of 18. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, artificial sources of ultraviolet radiation are in the highest category of carcinogens, joining tobacco and asbestos. Strong evidence links indoor tanning to increased risk for melanoma with repeated exposure during childhood being associated with the greatest increase in risk. Several countries and five US states have passed legislation banning indoor tanning in minors. We strongly encourage the remaining US states to do the same in an effort to protect children and prevent new cases of melanoma. SBM also strongly encourages research that explores the use of tanning beds in the home. Home-based indoor tanning has the potential to be especially dangerous given the complete absence of safety regulations. Children are currently protected from exposure to health-harming substances like tobacco and lead; thus, legislation protecting them from artificial sources of ultraviolet radiation is yet another important step forward in improving public health.

KEYWORDS

Skin cancer Indoor tanning Melanoma Prevention Health policy 

References

  1. 1.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Report on carcinogens, exposure to sunlamps or sunbeds, N.T.P. Public Health Service, Editor. 2011: USDHHS.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    FDA. Indoor Tanning: The Risks of Ultraviolet Rays. 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement: ultraviolet radiation, a hazard to children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011; 104(2): 328.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    American Academy of Dermatology. Indoor tanning. 2013 [cited 2013 April 5].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canadian Pediatric Society. Banning children and youth under the age of 18 years from commercial tanning facilities. [May 1, 2013]; Available from: http://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/tanning-facilities. Accessed 25 Jul 2013.
  6. 6.
    IARC Working Group. Exposure to artificial UV light and skin cancer: summary and conclusion. In: I.W. Group, ed. IARC Working Group Reports. Lyons: WHO; 2005.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wehner MR et al. Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2012; 345: e5909.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boniol M et al. Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2012; 345: e4757.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epidemiologic notes and reports injuries associated with ultraviolet tanning devices—Wisconsin. In: CDC, ed. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services; 1989: 333-335.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walters BL, Kelley TM. Commercial tanning facilities: a new source of eye injury. Am J Emerg Med. 1987; 5(5): 386-389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cust AE et al. Sunbed use during adolescence and early adulthood is associated with increased risk of early-onset melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2011; 128(10): 2425-2435.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nolan BV et al. Tanning as an addictive behavior: a literature review. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2009; 25(1): 12-19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harrington CR et al. Addictive-like behaviours to ultraviolet light among frequent indoor tanners. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011; 36(1): 33-38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heckman CJ et al. A preliminary investigation of the predictors of tanning dependence. Am J Health Behav. 2008; 32(5): 451-464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mosher CE, Danoff-Burg S. Addiction to indoor tanning: relation to anxiety, depression, and substance use. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146(4): 412-417.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mosher CE, Danoff-Burg S. Indoor tanning, mental health, and substance use among college students: the significance of gender. J Health Psychol. 2010; 15(6): 819-827.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poorsattar SP, Hornung RL. UV light abuse and high-risk tanning behavior among undergraduate college students. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 56(3): 375-379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hillhouse JJ et al. Evaluating a measure of tanning abuse and dependence. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148(7): 815-819.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Conference of State Legislatures. Indoor tanning restrictions for minors: A state-by-state comparison. 2013 [cited 2013 April 5, 2013]; Available from: http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/indoor-tanning-restrictions.aspx. Accessed 25 Jul 2013.
  20. 20.
    Mayer JA et al. Adolescents' use of indoor tanning: a large-scale evaluation of psychosocial, environmental, and policy-level correlates. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101(5): 930-938.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Choi K et al. Prevalence and characteristics of indoor tanning use among men and women in the United States. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146(12): 1356-1361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Magee KH et al. Tanning device usage: what are parents thinking? Pediatr Dermatol. 2007; 24(3): 216-221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baker MK, Hillhouse JJ, Liu X. The effect of initial indoor tanning with mother on current tanning patterns. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146(12): 1427-1428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cokkinides VE et al. Use of indoor tanning sunlamps by US youth, ages 11-18 years, and by their parent or guardian caregivers: Prevalence and correlates. Pediatrics. 2002; 109(6): 1124-1130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoerster KD et al. The influence of parents and peers on adolescent indoor tanning behavior: findings from a multi-city sample. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 57(6): 990-997.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stryker JE et al. Maternal/female caregiver influences on adolescent indoor tanning. J Adolesc Health. 2004; 35(6): 528 e1-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zeller S et al. Do adolescent indoor tanners exhibit dependency? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 54(4): 589-596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cokkinides VE et al. Indoor tanning use among adolescent in the United States, 1998 to 2004. Cancer. 2009; 115(1): 190-198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Forster JL et al. Compliance with restrictions on sale of indoor tanning sessions to youth in Minnesota and Massachusetts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 55(6): 962-967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Culley CA et al. Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001; 44(1): 53-60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoerster KD et al. Density of indoor tanning facilities in 116 large U.S. cities. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(3): 243-246.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jain N, Rademaker A, Robinson JK. Implementation of the federal excise tax on indoor tanning services in Illinois. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148(1): 122-124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hornung RL et al. Tanning facility use: are we exceeding Food and Drug Administration limits? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 49(4): 655-661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pichon LC et al. Youth access to artificial UV radiation exposure: practices of 3647 US indoor tanning facilities. Arch Dermatol. 2009; 145(9): 997-1002.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pawlak MT et al. Legislation restricting access to indoor tanning throughout the world. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148(9): 1006-1012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hester EJ, et al. Archives of Dermatology. 141, Compliance with youth access regulations for indoor UV tanning. 8(959-962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherry Pagoto
    • 1
  • Joel Hillhouse
    • 2
  • Carolyn J Heckman
    • 3
  • Elliot J Coups
    • 4
  • Jerod Stapleton
    • 4
  • David Buller
    • 5
  • Rob Turrisi
    • 6
  • June Robinson
    • 7
  • Alan C Geller
    • 8
  1. 1.University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.East Tennessee State UniversityJohnson CityUSA
  3. 3.Fox Chase Cancer CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.University of Medicine and Dentistry New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA
  5. 5.Klein Buendel, IncGoldenUSA
  6. 6.Penn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  7. 7.Northwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  8. 8.Harvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations