Weight loss social support in 140 characters or less: use of an online social network in a remotely delivered weight loss intervention
- 1.3k Downloads
Little is known about how online social networking can help enhance weight loss. To examine the types of online social support utilized in a behavioral weight loss intervention and relationship of posting and weight loss. A sub-analysis of the content and number of posts to Twitter among participants (n = 47) randomized to a mobile, social network arm as part of a 6-month trial among overweight adults, examining weight loss, use of Twitter, and type of social support (informational, tangible assistance, esteem, network, and emotional support). A number of Twitter posts were related to % weight loss at 6 months (p < 0.001). Initial reported weight loss predicted engagement with Twitter (p < 0.01) but prior Twitter use or initial Twitter engagement did not. Most Twitter posts (total posts n = 2,630) were Informational support (n = 1,981; 75 %), with the predominant subtype of Teaching (n = 1,632; 62 %), mainly in the form of a status update (n = 1,319). Engagement with Twitter was related to weight loss and participants mainly used Twitter to provide Information support to one another through status updates.
KEYWORDSSocial support Weight loss Social media eHealth Mobile health
The authors would like to thank Alaina Boyle, Jordan Wong, and Megan McMullins for their assistance with coding the messages in the study. In addition, the authors thank the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Population Sciences Award and the UNC Interdisciplinary Obesity Center (NIHM 5-T32-MH75854-05) for providing funding for this research.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no financial disclosures.
- 20.Madden, M., Zickuhr, K. (2011) Pew Internet and american life project. 65 % of online adults use social networking sites. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Networking-Sites/Overview.aspx. Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/65cob3GYB. Accessed 9 January 2012.
- 26.Fox, S., Zickuhr, K., Smith, A (2009) Pew Internet and american life project: Twitter and status updating. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/17-Twitter-and-Status-Updating-Fall-2009.aspx. Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/67UAYUnQl. Accessed 8 February 2012.
- 27.Smith, A. (2011) Pew Internet and american life project: Twitter update. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Twitter-Update-2011/Main-Report.aspx. Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/67UAT49tE. Accessed 15 March 2012.
- 30.Masamichi, T., Masakazu, F., Nobuhiro, Y. (2003) The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment. Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. Sanibel Island, Florida.Google Scholar
- 31.Nonnecke, B., Preece, J. (2000) Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. The Netherlands: The Hague.Google Scholar
- 36.Chuang, K., Yang, C.C. (2010) Social support in Online Healthcare Social Networking. Paper presented at: iConference 2010 Papers 2010.Google Scholar