Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 287–294 | Cite as

Weight loss social support in 140 characters or less: use of an online social network in a remotely delivered weight loss intervention

Original Research

ABSTRACT

Little is known about how online social networking can help enhance weight loss. To examine the types of online social support utilized in a behavioral weight loss intervention and relationship of posting and weight loss. A sub-analysis of the content and number of posts to Twitter among participants (n = 47) randomized to a mobile, social network arm as part of a 6-month trial among overweight adults, examining weight loss, use of Twitter, and type of social support (informational, tangible assistance, esteem, network, and emotional support). A number of Twitter posts were related to % weight loss at 6 months (p < 0.001). Initial reported weight loss predicted engagement with Twitter (p < 0.01) but prior Twitter use or initial Twitter engagement did not. Most Twitter posts (total posts n = 2,630) were Informational support (n = 1,981; 75 %), with the predominant subtype of Teaching (n = 1,632; 62 %), mainly in the form of a status update (n = 1,319). Engagement with Twitter was related to weight loss and participants mainly used Twitter to provide Information support to one another through status updates.

KEYWORDS

Social support Weight loss Social media eHealth Mobile health 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Umberson D, Montez JK. Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2010; 51(Suppl):S54-S66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stewart MJ, Kushner KE, Greaves L, Letourneau N, Spitzer D, Boscoe M. Impacts of a support intervention for low-income women who smoke. Social Science & Medicine. 2010; 71(11):1901-1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shaya FT, Yan X, Farshid M, et al. Social networks in cardiovascular disease management. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 2010; 10(6):701-705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Dam HA, van der Horst FG, Knoops L, Ryckman RM, Crebolder HF, van den Borne BH. Social support in diabetes: a systematic review of controlled intervention studies. Patient Education and Counseling. 2005; 59(1):1-12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heard E, Whitfield KE, Edwards CL, Bruce MA, Beech BM. Mediating effects of social support on the relationship among perceived stress, depression, and hypertension in African Americans. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2011; 103(2):116-122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11(1):119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeffery RW, Bjornson-Benson WM, Rosenthal BS, Lindquist RA, Kurth CL, Johnson SL. Correlates of weight loss and its maintenance over two years of follow-up among middle-aged men. Preventive Medicine. 1984; 13(2):155-168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Verheijden MW, Bakx JC, van Weel C, Koelen MA, van Staveren WA. Role of social support in lifestyle-focused weight management interventions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005; 59(Suppl 1):S179-S186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelsey K, Earp JAL, Kirkley BG. Is social support beneficial for dietary change? A review of the literature. Family & Community Health. 1997; 20(3):70-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson-Bill ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR, Winett SG. Web-based guide to health: relationship of theoretical variables to change in physical activity, nutrition and weight at 16-months. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011; 13(1):e27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tate DF. A series of studies examining Internet treatment of obesity to inform Internet interventions for substance use and misuse. Substance Use & Misuse. 2011; 46(1):57-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003; 289(14):1833-1836.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001; 285(9):1172-1177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McConnon A, Kirk SF, Ransley JK. Process evaluation of an internet-based resource for weight control: use and views of an obese sample. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2009; 41(4):261-267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Webber KH, Tate DF, Michael Bowling J. A randomized comparison of two motivationally enhanced Internet behavioral weight loss programs. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2008; 46(9):1090-1095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Binks M, van Mierlo T. Utilization patterns and user characteristics of an ad libitum Internet weight loss program. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2010; 12(1):e9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cutrona CE, Suhr JA. Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research. 1992; 19(2):154-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hwang KO, Ottenbacher AJ, Green AP, et al. Social support in an Internet weight loss community. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2010; 79(1):5-13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van De Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Berben SA, Schoonhoven L. Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2010; 12(2):e18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Madden, M., Zickuhr, K. (2011) Pew Internet and american life project. 65 % of online adults use social networking sites. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Networking-Sites/Overview.aspx. Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/65cob3GYB. Accessed 9 January 2012.
  21. 21.
    Turner-McGrievy G, Tate D. Tweets, Apps, and Pods: results of the 6-month mobile pounds off digitally (mobile POD) randomized weight-loss intervention among adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011; 13(4):e120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior. 2004; 31(2):143-164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turner-McGrievy GM, Campbell MK, Tate DF, Truesdale KP, Bowling JM, Crosby L. Pounds Off Digitally study: a randomized podcasting weight-loss intervention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009; 37(4):263-269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Family Medicine. 2005; 37(5):360-363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ. 2004; 328(7449):1166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fox, S., Zickuhr, K., Smith, A (2009) Pew Internet and american life project: Twitter and status updating. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/17-Twitter-and-Status-Updating-Fall-2009.aspx. Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/67UAYUnQl. Accessed 8 February 2012.
  27. 27.
    Smith, A. (2011) Pew Internet and american life project: Twitter update. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Twitter-Update-2011/Main-Report.aspx. Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/67UAT49tE. Accessed 15 March 2012.
  28. 28.
    Nackers L, Ross K, Perri M. The association between rate of initial weight loss and long-term success in obesity treatment: does slow and steady win the race? International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2010; 17(3):161-167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haferkamp N, Kramer NC. Social comparison 2.0: examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. 2011; 14(5):309-314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Masamichi, T., Masakazu, F., Nobuhiro, Y. (2003) The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment. Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. Sanibel Island, Florida.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nonnecke, B., Preece, J. (2000) Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. The Netherlands: The Hague.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hogan BE, Linden W, Najarian B. Social support interventions: do they work? Clinical Psychology Review. 2002; 22(3):383-442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Clarke KK, Freeland-Graves J, Klohe-Lehman DM, Bohman TM. Predictors of weight loss in low-income mothers of young children. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007; 107(7):1146-1154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim C, McEwen LN, Kieffer EC, Herman WH, Piette JD. Self-efficacy, social support, and associations with physical activity and body mass index among women with histories of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Education. 2008; 34(4):719-728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kumanyika SK, Wadden TA, Shults J, et al. Trial of family and friend support for weight loss in African American adults. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2009; 169(19):1795-1804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chuang, K., Yang, C.C. (2010) Social support in Online Healthcare Social Networking. Paper presented at: iConference 2010 Papers 2010.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bender JL, Jimenez-Marroquin MC, Jadad AR. Seeking support on facebook: a content analysis of breast cancer groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011; 13(1):e16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Scanfeld D, Scanfeld V, Larson EL. Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics. American Journal of Infection Control. 2010; 38(3):182-188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy
    • 1
  • Deborah F Tate
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Behavior and Education, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations