Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 431–440 | Cite as

A transdisciplinary approach to protocol development for tobacco control research: a case study

  • Melissa A. Clark
  • Michelle L. Rogers
  • Julie Boergers
  • Christopher W. Kahler
  • Susan Ramsey
  • Frances M. Saadeh
  • David B. Abrams
  • Stephen L. Buka
  • Raymond Niaura
  • Suzanne M. Colby
Case Study

ABSTRACT

The increasing complexity of scientific problems related to lifestyle risk factors has prompted substantial investments in transdisciplinary or team science initiatives at the biological, psychosocial, and population levels of analysis. To date, the actual process of conducting team science from the perspectives of investigators engaged in it has not been well documented. We describe the experience of developing and implementing data collection protocols using the principles of transdisciplinary science. The New England Family Study Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center was a 10-year collaboration involving more than 85 investigators and consultants from more than 20 disciplines as well as more than 50 research staff. We used a two-phase process in which all the study personnel participated in the developing and testing of 160 instruments. These instruments were used in 4,378 assessments with 3,501 participants. With substantial effort, it is possible to build a team of scientists from diverse backgrounds that can develop a set of instruments using a shared conceptual approach, despite limited or no experience working together previously.

Keywords

Team science Transdisciplinary Tobacco Cooperative behavior Interdisciplinary communication 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Rosenfield PL. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med. 1992; 35(11):1343-1357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turkkan JS, Kaufman NJ, Rimer BK. Transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers: a model collaboration between public and private sectors. Nic Tob Res. 2000; 2(1):9-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stokols D, Fuqua J, Gress J, et al. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nic Tob Res. 2003; 5(Suppl 1):S21-S39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson Klein JT. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abrams DB. Transdisciplinary paradigms for tobacco prevention research. Nic Tob Res. 1999; 1(Suppl 1):S15-S23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall KL, Stokols D, Stipelman BA, et al. Assessing the value of team science: a study comparing center- and investigator-initiated grants. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(2):157-163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mabry PL, Olster DH, Morgan GD, Abrams DB. Interdisciplinarity and systems science to improve population health: a view from the NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S211-S224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abrams DB, Leslie F, Mermelstein R, Kobus K, Clayton RR. Transdisciplinary tobacco use research. Nic Tob Res. 2003; 5(Suppl 1):S5-S10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baker TB, Cummings KM, Hatsukami DK, et al. Transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers: research achievements and future implications. Nic Tob Res. 2009; 11(10):1231-1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morgan GD, Kobus K, Gerlach KK, et al. Facilitating transdisciplinary research: the experience of the transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers. Nic Tob Res. 2003; 5(Suppl 1):S11-S19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Masse LC, Moser RP, Stokols D, et al. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S151-S160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall KL, Stokols D, Moser RP, et al. The collaboration readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers findings from the National Cancer Institute's TREC Year-One Evaluation Study. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S161-S172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kobus K, Mermelstein R, Ponkshe P. Communications strategies to broaden the reach of tobacco use research: examples from the transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers. Nic Tob Res. 2007; 9(Suppl 4):S571-S582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stokols D, Misra S, Moser RP, Hall KL, Taylor BK. The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S96-S115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klein JT. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S116-S123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rimer BK, Abrams DB. Present and future horizons for transdisciplinary research. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(2):200-201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Broman S, Bien E, Shaughnessy P. Low Achieving Children: The First Seven Years. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum; 1985.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buka SL, Lipsitt LP, Tsuang MT. Birth complications and psychological deviancy: a 25-year prospective inquiry. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1988; 30(5):537-546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nichols P, Chen T. Minimal Brain Dysfunction: A Prospective Study. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum; 1981.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klebanoff MA, Zemel BS, Buka S, Zierler S. Long-term follow-up of participants in the Collaborative Perinatal Project: tracking the next generation. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998; 12(3):334-346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991; 86(9):1119-1127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robins L, Wing J, Wittchen H, et al. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988; 45:1069-1077.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Piper ME, Piasecki TM, Federman EB, et al. A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68). J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72(2):139-154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shiffman S, Waters A, Hickcox M. The Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale: a multidimensional measure of nicotine dependence. Nic Tob Res. 2004; 6(2):327-348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Colby SM, Clark MA, Rogers ML, et al. Development and reliability of the lifetime interview on smoking trajectories. Nic Tob Res. 2012; 14(3):290-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pomerleau OF, Pomerleau CS, Namenek RJ. Early experiences with tobacco among women smokers, ex-smokers, and never-smokers. Addiction. 1998; 93(4):595-599.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shenassa ED, McCaffery JM, Swan GE, et al. Intergenerational transmission of tobacco use and dependence: a transdisciplinary perspective. Nic Tob Res. 2003; 5(Suppl 1):S55-S69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kahler CW, Strong DR, Papandonatos GD, et al. Cigarette smoking and the lifetime alcohol involvement continuum. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008; 93(1–2):111-120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boergers J, Clark M, Colby S, et al. Effects of Audiotaping on Adolescents’ Self-Reports of Tobacco and Substance Use. Annual Meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. Orlando, FL; 2006.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gilman SE, Rende R, Boergers J, et al. Parental smoking and adolescent smoking initiation: an intergenerational perspective on tobacco control. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(2):e274-e281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kahler CW, Daughters SB, Leventhal AM, et al. Personality, psychiatric disorders, and smoking in middle-aged adults. Nic Tob Res. 2009; 11(7):833-841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kahler CW, Leventhal AM, Daughters SB, et al. Relationships of personality and psychiatric disorders to multiple domains of smoking motives and dependence in middle-aged adults. Nic Tob Res. 2010; 12(4):381-389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dierker LC, Donny E, Tiffany S, Colby SM, Perrine N, Clayton RR. The association between cigarette smoking and DSM-IV nicotine dependence among first year college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 86(2–3):106-114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Strong DR, Kahler CW, Colby SM, Griesler PC, Kandel D. Linking measures of adolescent nicotine dependence to a common latent continuum. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009; 99(1–3):296-308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kahn R, Prager D. Interdisciplinary collaboration are a scientific and social imperative. Scientist. 1994; 8:12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa A. Clark
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michelle L. Rogers
    • 2
  • Julie Boergers
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Christopher W. Kahler
    • 6
    • 7
  • Susan Ramsey
    • 3
    • 8
  • Frances M. Saadeh
    • 2
  • David B. Abrams
    • 9
    • 10
    • 11
  • Stephen L. Buka
    • 1
    • 2
  • Raymond Niaura
    • 9
  • Suzanne M. Colby
    • 3
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology, Program in Public HealthBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Center for Population Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Program in Public HealthBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical SchoolBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  4. 4.Department of Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical SchoolBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  5. 5.Bradley-Hasbro Children’s Research CenterRhode Island HospitalProvidenceUSA
  6. 6.Department of Behavioral and Social SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  7. 7.Center for Alcohol and Addiction StudiesBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  8. 8.Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical SchoolBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  9. 9.The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy StudiesAmerican Legacy FoundationWashingtonUSA
  10. 10.Department of Health, Behavior and SocietyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  11. 11.Department of OncologyGeorgetown University Medical Center/Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations