Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 364–371 | Cite as

Behavioral health integration: an essential element of population-based healthcare redesign

  • Shandra M Brown Levey
  • Benjamin F Miller
  • Frank Verloin deGruyIII
Practice and Public Health Policies


The fundamental aim of healthcare reform is twofold: to provide health insurance coverage for most of the citizens currently uninsured, thereby granting them access to healthcare; and to redesign the overall healthcare system to provide better care and achieve the triple aim (better health for the population, better healthcare for individuals, and at less cost). The foundation for this improved system will rest on a redesigned (i.e., sufficiently comprehensive and integrated) system of primary care, with which all other providers, services, and sites of care are associated. The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) and its congeners are the best current examples of the kind of primary care that can achieve the triple aim, if they can become sufficiently comprehensive and can adequately integrate services. This means fully integrating behavioral healthcare into the PCMH, a difficult task under the most favorable circumstances. Creating functioning accountable care organizations is an even more daunting task: this requires new principles of collaborating and financing and the current prototypes have generally failed to incorporate behavioral healthcare sufficient to meet even the basic needs of the target population. This paper will discuss (1) the case for and the difficulties associated with integrating behavioral healthcare into primary care at three levels: the practice, the state, and the nation; and (2) how this looks clinically, operationally, and financially.


Mental health Behavioral health Primary care Integrated care Collaborative care Healthcare policy 


  1. 1.
    Marrs Maddocks & Associates. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). 2010;, 2012.
  2. 2.
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press;2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeVoe JE, Dodoo MS, Phillips RL Jr, Green LA. Who will have health insurance in the year 2025? American Family Physician. 2005;72(10):1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health Care Spending in the United States and Selected OECD Countries. April 2011 2011.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nolte E, McKee, M. Measuring the health of nations: analysis of mortality amenable to health care. BMJ. 2003;327(7424).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thorpe K, Howard, DH, Galactionova, K. Differences in disease prevalence as a source of the U.S.–European health care spending gap. Health Affairs Web Exclusive October 2, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    deGruy F. Mental health care in the primary care setting. In: Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, Vanselow NA (Eds.) Primary care: America's health in a new era. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine; 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Butler M, Kane RL, McAlpin D, et al. Integration of Mental Health/Substance Abuse and Primary Care No. 173 (Prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0009.) AHRQ Publication No. 09-E003. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; October 2008 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lurie IZ, Manheim LM, Dunlop DD. Differences in medical care expenditures for adults with depression compared to adults with major chronic conditions. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics. 2009;12(2):87-95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stoner SC, Marken PA, Sommi RW. Psychiatric comorbidity and mental illness. Medical Update for Psychiatrists. 1998;3(3):64-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collins C, Hewson DL, Munger R, Wade T. Evolving Models of Behavioral Health Integration in Primary Care 2010.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Institute of Mental Health. The numbers count: mental disorders in America. 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kroenke K, Mangelsdorff AD. Common symptoms in ambulatory care: incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcome. American Journal of Medicine. 1989;86:262-266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flottemesch T SS, O’Connor PJ, Solberg L, Asche S, Pawlson LG. 2010. Under review. Are characteristics of the medical home associated with diabetes care costs?Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robinson PJ, Reiter JT. Behavioral consultation and primary care: a guide to integrating services. New York: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Owens P, Mutter, R.L., & Stocks, C. Mental health and substance abuse-related emergency department visits among adults, 2007. 2010.]
  17. 17.
    Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593-602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trask PC, Schwartz SM, Deaner SL, et al. Behavioral medicine: the challenge of integrating psychological and behavioral approaches into primary care. Effective Clinical Practice. 2002;5:75-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Evans DL, Charney DS, Lewis L, Golden RN, Gorman JM, Ranga Rama Krishnan K, Nemeroff CB, Bremner JD, Carney RM, Coyne JC, Delong MR, Frasure-Smith N, Glassman AH, Gold PW, Grant I, Gwyther L, Ironson G, Johnson RR, Kanner AM, Katon WJ, Kaufmann PG, Keefe FJ, Ketter T, Laughren TP, Leserman J, Lyketsos CG, McDonald WM, McEwen BS, Miller AH, Musselman D, O’Connor C, Petitto JM, Pollock BG, Robinson RG, Roose SP, Rowland J, Sheline Y, Sheps DS, Simon G, Spiegel D, Stunkard A, Sunderland T, Tibbits P, Valvo WJ. Mood disorders in the medically ill: scientific review and recommendations. Biological Psychiatry. 2005;58:175-189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Daniel J, Honey, W., Landen, M., Marshall-Williams, S., Chapman, D., Lando, J. Mental health in the United States: health risk behaviors and conditions among persons with depression—New Mexico, 2003. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2005;39:989-991.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Allison TG, Williams DE, Miller TD. Medical and economic costs of psychological distress in patients with coronary artery disease. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1995;70:734-742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Compas BE, Haaga DAF, Keefe FJ, Leitenberg H, Williams DA. Sampling of empirically supported psychological treatments for health psychology: smoking, chronic pain, cancer, and bulimia nervosa. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998;66:89-112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spiegel D, Bloom JR, Yalom I. Group support for patients with metastatic cancer: a randomized prospective outcome study. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1981;38:527-533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spiegel D, Bloom JR, Kramer HC, Gottheil E. Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Lancet. 1989;2:888-890.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fawzy FI, Fawzy NW, Hyun CS. Effects of an early structured psychiatric intervention, coping and affective state on recurrance and survival 6 years later. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1993;50:681-689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anderson BL. Psychological interventions for cancer patients to enhance quality of life. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1992;60:552-568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spiegel D, Sephton SE, Stites DP. Effects of psychosocial treatment in prolonging cancer survival may be mediated by neuroimmune pathways. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1998;840:674-683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Richardson JL, Shelton DR, Krailo M, Levine AM. The effects of compliance with treatment on survival among patients with hematologic malignancies. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1990;8:356-364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hermann C, Brand-Driehorst S, Kaminsky B. Diagnostic groups and depressed mood as predictors of 22-month mortality in medical inpatients. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1999;60:570-577.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ries DK. ACO mission: behavioral healthcare under the Medicare Shared Savings Program. June 2011 ACO Special Edition 2011. Accessed October, 23, 2011. Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fields D, Leshen E, Patel K. Driving quality gains and cost savings through adoption of medical homes. Health Affairs. 2010;29(5):819-826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reid RFP, Yu O, Ross T, Tufano JT. Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation. The American Journal of Managed Care. 2009;15(9):71-87.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Patient Centered Primary Care Collaborative. PCMH—Evidence of Quality. 2011; Accessed October, 24, 2011.
  34. 34.
    Miller BF, Kessler R, Peek CJ, Kallenberg GA. A national research agenda for research in collaborative care: papers from the Collaborative Care Research Network Research Development Conference. AHRQ Publication No. 11-0067. 2011.
  35. 35.
    Miller BF, Mendenhall TJ, Malik AD. Integrated primary care: an inclusive three-world view through process metrics and empirical discrimination. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 2009;16:21-30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”, 111 H.R. 3590 [including the Medicare Shared Savings Program under Title III—named “Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Health Care”—under the subpart for “Encouraging Development of New Patient Care Models.”].Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    BlueCross Blue Shield of Minnesota has launched a “shared incentive” payment model with four of Minnesota’s largest care systems—Allina Hospitals & Clinics, Essentia Health, Fairview Health Services, and HealthEast Care System. (See In San Diego, Anthem Blue Cross is collaborating with Sharp Community Medical Group and Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Centers on an ACO (see
  38. 38.
    Takach M, Purington, K., Osius, E. A tale of two systems: a look at state efforts to integrate primary care and behavioral health in safety net settings. Portland: National Academy for State Health Policy; 2010.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bachman J, Pincus HA, Houtsinger JK, Unutzer J. Funding mechanisms for depression care management: opportunities and challenges. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2006;28(4):278-288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems. What is a Safety Net Hospital?
  41. 41.
    Collaborative PCPC. Payment Reform Task Force Agenda 2011.
  42. 42.
    Colton CW, Manderscheid RW. Congruencies in increased mortality rates, years of potential life lost, and causes of death among public mental health clients in eight states. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2006;3(2):A42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    42 U.S.C. § 256a-1 [Under the PPACA section for “Establishing Community Health Teams to Support the Patient-Centered Medical Home” one requirement of health teams is that they “implement interdisciplinary, interprofessional care plans” § 256a-1(c)(4)] and 42 U.S.C. § 1396w-4 [Under PPACA’s “State Option to Provide Health Homes for Enrollees with Chronic Conditions”, the care team is comprised of “physicians and other professionals, such as a nurse care coordinator, nutritionist, social worker, behavioral health professional, or any professionals deemed appropriate by the State.” § 1396w-4(h)(6).]Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    42 U.S.C. § 1899(b)(1)(E).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Proposed rule 42 C.F.R. § 425.4.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Proposed rule 42 C.F.R. § 425.5(d)(15)(ii)(B)(4).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Proposed rule 42 C.F.R. § 425.5(d)(15)(ii)(B)(3).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    29 U.S.C. § 1185a; 29 C.F.R. § 2590.712.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    42 U.S.C. § 13951(c).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    States with mental health parity statutes are: Alabama (§ 27-54-4(b)), Alaska (§ 21.54.151), Arizona (§ 20-2322), Arkansas (§§ 23-99-501 to 23-99-12), Connecticut (§ 38a-476a), Georgia (§ 33-29-24.1), Hawaii (§ 431 M-5), Idaho (for state employees at § 67-5761A), Illinois (215 § 5/370c), Indiana (§§ 27-13-7-14.8, 27-8-5-15.6), Kansas (§ 40-2,105a), Minnesota (62Q.47), Missouri (§ 376.811), Montana (§ 33-22-703 ), Nebraska (§ 44-793), New Hampshire (§ 415:18-a), New Mexico (§§ 59A-23E-18), New York (Ins. § 3221(1)(5)(A)), North Carolina (§ 58-3-220), North Dakota (§26.1-36-08), Ohio (§§ 3923:29, 3923:281, 3923:282), Oklahoma (§ 6060.11), Oregon (§ 743A.168), Rhode Island (Ch. 27–38.2), South Carolina (§ 38-71-290), South Dakota (§ 58-17-98), Tennessee (§ 56-7-2360 [mental health], § 56-7-2602 [substance abuse]), Texas (Ins. § 1355), Vermont (8 § 4089b), Virginia (38.2 § 3412.1:01 [mental health only]), and Wisconsin (§ 632.89).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    National Advisory Mental Health Council Parity in Financing Mental Health Services (National Institute of Mental Health Archive, 1998) at 54 (listing states that had enacted mental health parity laws by 1997 as: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas and Vermont).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Insurance coverage for the treatment of mental illness is required by Alabama (27-54-4(a)), Arkansas (§ 23-86-113), California (Ins. § 10125), Connecticut (§ 38a-488a), Delaware (Ins. § 3578), Florida (§ 627.668), Georgia (§ 33-24-28.1), Hawaii (§ 431 M-4(c)), Illinois (215 § 5/370c), Iowa (§ 514 C.22), Kansas (§ 40-2,105), Louisiana (R.S. 22:1043), Maine (Title 24-A, §§2749, 2843, 4234-A), Massachusetts (Ch. 175, § 47B), Missouri (§§ 376.814, 376.1550), Montana (§ 33-22-703), Nevada (§§ 689A.0455, 689 C.169), New Hampshire (§ 417-E:1), New Jersey (§§ 17:48-6v, 17:48A-7u, 17:48E-35.20, 17B:26-2.1 s, 17B:27-46.1v), North Carolina (§ 58-3-220), Ohio (§ 3923:282), Oklahoma (§ 6060.11), Oregon (§ 743A.168), Rhode Island (Ch. 27-38.2), South Carolina (§ 38-71-290), South Dakota (§ 58-17-98), Tennessee (§ 56-7-2601), Texas (Ins. § 1355), Utah (§ 31A-22-625 [mandating offer of coverage]), Vermont (8 § 4089b), Virginia (38.2 § 3412.1), Washington (§ 48.21.241 [commercial insurance] and § 48.41.220 [coverage by state insurance pool]), West Virginia (§ 33-16-3a) Wisconsin (§ 632.89), and Wyoming (§§ 26-22-102, 26-22-106).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Insurance coverage for the treatment of substance abuse is required by Arkansas (§ 23-79-139), Colorado (§ 10-16-104.7), Delaware (Ins. § 3343(b)), Florida (§ 627.669), Hawaii (§ 431 M-4(b)), Kansas (§ 40-2,105), Louisiana (R.S. 22:1025), Maine (24-A, §2842), Maryland (§ 15-802), Mississippi (§ 83-9-27), Missouri (§ 376.811), Montana (§ 33-22-703), Nevada (§§ 689A.046, 689 C.166), New Jersey (§§ 17:48-6a, 17:48A-7a, 17:48E-34, 17B:26-2.1), New Mexico (§§ 59A-23-6; 59A-47-35), North Dakota (§26.1-36-08), Ohio (§ 3923:29), Oregon (§ 743A.168), Tennessee (§ 56-7-2601), Texas (Ins. § 1368), Utah (§ 31A-22-625 [mandating offer of coverage]), Vermont (8 § 4089b), Virginia (38.2 § 3412.1), and Wisconsin (§ 632.89).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Insurance coverage of autism spectrum disorders is required in California (Health & Safety Code § 1374.72), Connecticut (§ 38a-514b), Illinois (215 ILCS 5/3562.14), Indiana (§ 27-13-7-14.7), Louisiana (§ 22:1050), Nevada (§ 689A.0435), Pennsylvania (40 P.S. § 764 h), South Carolina (§ 38-71-280), Vermont (8 § 4088i), Virginia (38.2 § 3412.1:01), and Wisconsin (§ 632.895(12 m)).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    42 U.S.C. § 18031(j).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    42 U.S.C. § 18022(b)(1)(E).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Affordable Care Act § 1311(j); see also PHS Act § 2726 E, Internal Revenue Code § 9812. See also interim final regulations at 75 FR 5410 (February 2, 2010) and guidance published on June 30, 2010 (, December 22, 2010 (, and November 17, 2011 (
  58. 58.
    Department of Health and Human Services. Essential Health Benefits Bulletin. In: Oversight CfCIaI, ed2011:13.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. Patient-Centered Medical Home. 2011; Accessed April, 14, 2011.
  60. 60.
    Blount A, Kathol R, Thomas M, et al. The economics of behavioral health services in medical settings: a summary of the evidence. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2007;38:290-297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kautz C, Mauch D, Smith SA. Reimbursement of mental health services in primary care settings. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration;2008. HHS Pub. No. SMA-08-4324.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kessler R, Stafford D, Messier R. The problem of integrating behavioral health in the medical home and the questions it leads to. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 2009;16(1):4-12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Peek CJ. Planning care in the clinical, operational, and financial worlds. In: Kessler R, Stafford D, eds. Collaborative Medicine Case Studies: evidence in Practice. New York: Springer; 2008.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Green L, Ottosen, JM. From efficacy to effectiveness to community and back: evidence based practice vs. practice based evidence. Paper presented at the From Clinical Trials to Community: The Science of Translating Diabetes and Obesity Research conference; Jan 12–13, 2004; Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pace WD, Staton EW. Electronic data collection options for practice-based research networks. Annals of Family Medicine. 2005;3(suppl1):s21-s29. doi:10.1370/afm.270.
  66. 66.
    NCQA. Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2011 Draft Standards Overview2010.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Solberg SS LI, Scholle SH, Asche SE, Shih SC, Pawlson LG, Thoele MJ. Practice systems for chronic care: frequency and dependence on an electronic medical record. American Journal of Managed Care. 2005;11(12):789-796.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Solberg LA S, Pawlson LG, Scholle SH, Shih S. Practice systems are associated with high-quality care for diabetes. American Journal of Managed Care. 2008;14(2):85-92.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Smith ML, Glass GV. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist. 1977;32(9):752-760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kessler RC, Demler O, Frank RG, et al. Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003. N Engl J Med. June 16, 2005 2005;352(24):2515-2523.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pincus HA, Tanielian TL, Marcus SC, et al. Prescribing trends in psychotropic medications: primary care, psychiatry, and other medical specialties. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;279(7):526-531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Singer S, Shortell SM. Implementing accountable care organizations: ten potential mistakes and how to learn from them. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2011;306(7):758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Fisher ES, Shortell SM. Accountable care organizations: accountable for what, to whom, and how. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;304(15):1715-1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cohen JT. A Guide to Accountable Care Organizations, and Their Role in the Senate’s Health Reform Bill. Health Reform Watch: A Web Log of Seton Hall Law School’s Center for Health & Pharmaceutical Law & Policy 2010.
  75. 75.
    Hong BA, Robiner W. Accountable care organizations and psychology: getting on the invitation list to the party. Clinical Psychologist. 2011;64(3):4-7.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kathol RG, Butler M, McAlpine DD, Kane RL. Barriers to physical and mental condition integrated service delivery. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2010;72(6):511-518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shandra M Brown Levey
    • 1
  • Benjamin F Miller
    • 1
  • Frank Verloin deGruyIII
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Colorado Denver School of MedicineAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations